Rent Assessment Committee

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Rent Assessment Committee

    Can anyone help?
    My tenants have recently had their rent reassessed and the rent assessment committee who aren't even fron the same city have reduced the rent by £300 per month for the remaining 6 months of the tenancy.
    Apparently I have no right of appeal?
    The ast contract they signed was for 12months from 1st july09 but they now pay reduced rent for the last 6months which doesnt even cover the interest on my mortgage!
    Is there anything I can do or are AST contracts not worth the paper they're written on?
    Would appreciate anyones advice!!!

    #2
    This one is a bit mysterious. Rent assessment committees are, I believe, only enpowered to act when a landlord wishes to increase rent under section 13 and the tenant considers the proposed increase excessive, otherwise, during the fixed term of an AST they have no power, -particularly when the rent is fixed by the AST.
    Is this a case of rent act tenants (who have been tenants since before 1988) being asked by you to sign an AST, which they have mistakenly done when a rent assessment committee WOULD have power to make draconian reductions in rent below current market levels. (Thank you Mr. Harold Wilson!)

    P.P.
    Any information given in this post is based on my personal experience as a landlord, what I have learned from this and other boards and elsewhere. It is not to be relied on. Definitive advice is only available from a Solicitor or other appropriately qualified person.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by scholland View Post
      Can anyone help?
      My tenants have recently had their rent reassessed and the rent assessment committee who aren't even fron the same city have reduced the rent by £300 per month for the remaining 6 months of the tenancy.
      Apparently I have no right of appeal?
      The ast contract they signed was for 12months from 1st july09 but they now pay reduced rent for the last 6months which doesnt even cover the interest on my mortgage!
      Is there anything I can do or are AST contracts not worth the paper they're written on?
      Would appreciate anyones advice!!!
      When did tenant first take occupancy?

      Comment


        #4
        Rent assessment committee

        It's a mystery to me too! The tenants signed the ast contract for 12months from 1st july09-30jun10.
        The rent assessment committee can apparently determine the rent payable on any property regardless of the fact that a contract has been signed, as long as the tenants apply to have the rent asessed within the first 6months of the tenancy starting.
        I have rented this property for years and never come across it before but it's a frightening prospect that anyone can apply to have their rent assessed as we all know that properties rented to students achieve higher rents than those rented to families etc. The government apparently set up these committees who are supposed to be impartial and the law is section 22 of the housing act 1988?
        The road my property is on is full of student lets, all renting for similar amounts and yet they have still reduced the rent by £300 per month!!
        Just wondered if anyone could advise what if anything I can do about it as the information booklet says I can only appeal to the high court under the tribunals and inquiries act 1992 if I consider the committee has made a mistake of law. I would have thought altering the amount of rent on a signed contract was a mistake of law but I doubt the costly expense of trying to go to High court without legal representation would help me!! Any ideas anyone?

        Comment


          #5
          I await with interest the comments that our legal experts have to make about this one. As far as I am concerned, under the circumstances you state, I do not believe that a rent assessment panel has any power and that it is possible that they have been misinformed by your tenant who is now applying the decision that they have reached in error. It is certainly to the tenant's advantage to do this which is why this panel has been misinformed!

          Quite honestly, if tenants can appeal any fixed and established rents to such a panel who consider themselves empowered to make such draconian reductions, then just about every non-social landlord in the country will be selling up!
          The lack of private rental accommodation was the very reason that Maggie Thatcher ended Harold Wilson's housing acts which empowered these rent tribunals in 1988.


          P.P.
          Any information given in this post is based on my personal experience as a landlord, what I have learned from this and other boards and elsewhere. It is not to be relied on. Definitive advice is only available from a Solicitor or other appropriately qualified person.

          Comment


            #6
            Thanks for your comments. I'm glad I'm not the only one who sees the implications of this. If i can't do anything about it it makes a mockery of an AST contract and if my tenants no longer have to adhere to the contract then presumably neither do I?
            These tenants leave in 3 months but I'm concerned that if others get wind of this apparent law they can apply to have rent reductions, then I definately may as well sell!!
            What's really frustrating with this panel, is i sent so much evidence to show that this is the average rent charged for that area and I even put in a mortgage statement to show the amount of interest I pay and yet they have come up with a rent figure that doesnt even cover the mortgage interest, let alone insurance etc etc.
            My letting agent also sent in lists of properties for rent but they seem to have completely ignored all evidence!
            I await with interest for anyone who can shed any more light on this, I hope they can for all student landlords sakes!!

            Comment


              #7
              As a non-legal landlord, I regret that I can advise you no further than I already have, but should our legal experts be prepared to advise further, they will need to know:

              (i) Whether this tenancy is in England & Wales
              (ii) Whether the tenants have been living in the property before the current AST was granted.
              (iii) If so, when they first moved into the property.
              (iv) If you have a copy of the "judgement" made by this rent assessment panel, under what housing act and which subsection they are claiming gave them authority to act in this instance.

              P.P.
              Any information given in this post is based on my personal experience as a landlord, what I have learned from this and other boards and elsewhere. It is not to be relied on. Definitive advice is only available from a Solicitor or other appropriately qualified person.

              Comment


                #8
                The answers to those questions are
                1/ the tenancy is in England.
                2/The tenants did not live at the property before the start of the AST contract.
                3/ They moved in 1/7/09 when the contract began.
                4/Housing Act 1988-section 22
                where a tenant under an AST is dissatisfied with the rent payable within the first 6 months of tenancy they can apply to the RAC for a determination of rent.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Well: If this is fact then it is the reason that the majority of us do not grant AST's with fixed terms of over six months but it is the first time that I have ever heard of this particular regulation. In all the years I have been browsing this and other boards, I have never before heard of a rent being reduced in this way which, in view of the terms on which you claim this rent assessment committee can operate is very suprising. I assume that you will not grant a fixed term longer than the minimum again!

                  What is more suprising is that if section 13 is used to raise the rent in a statutory periodic or assured tenancy and the tenant objects to the proposed increase, then the rent assessment committee is required to consider the proposed increase with regard to commercial rents being charged for similar properties in the same locality. It would appear from what you say that this particular rent committee disregarded this information in coming to their decision.


                  P.P.
                  Any information given in this post is based on my personal experience as a landlord, what I have learned from this and other boards and elsewhere. It is not to be relied on. Definitive advice is only available from a Solicitor or other appropriately qualified person.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    This law seemingly still applies to any AST contract whether it's 6months or 12months. The benefit of having a 6month tenancy would be that they would have been leaving now so I wouldnt have to deal with them anymore. But my understanding is that the tenant can file a claim anytime within the first 6 months of the tenancy ie the day after the tenancy began and if successful, the RAC back dates the claim to the day it was made. So even a 6month contract could be affected in the same way.
                    What I really need to know is whether the AST contract they signed is still valid? Surely they can't pick and choose which parts of it they want altering? So if the rent they agreed and signed for no longer applies, do the rest of the terms of the contract no longer apply? I may be cutting my nose off to spite my face but I'd like to get them to leave if I can and try to find new tenants rather than let them stay there costing me money!!

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Scholland is correct. Applications to Rent Assessment Committees are rare due to the fact that the tenant does not have any long term security of tenure.

                      The committee should only have made a decision if they felt that there were a sufficient number of similar dwellings let on similar tenancies, and that the rent claimed was significantly higher.
                      PAUL GIBBS, solicitor, Jacobs & Reeves. My comments on this forum are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. No responsibility or liability is accepted by reason of reliance upon such comments. This disclaimer would not apply to direct clients of Jacobs & Reeves where there is a valid retainer in place and I would be happy to confirm any advice if formally instructed. . Jacobs & Reeves now offer a fixed fee possession service.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Having now done my "due dilligence" and read section 22 of the 1988 act it would appear that the assessment committee has the same powers during the first six months of a new AST with regard to the rent charged as it does during a section 13 procedure. However, from what Scholland is telling us is that the assessment committee did not consider rents for similar properties that were being charged in the area and, it would appear, disregarded evidence of this that Scholland himself submitted. Is there no appeal? Sounds a little draconian to me under the circumstances.

                        P.P.
                        Any information given in this post is based on my personal experience as a landlord, what I have learned from this and other boards and elsewhere. It is not to be relied on. Definitive advice is only available from a Solicitor or other appropriately qualified person.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          One difference in the Committee's powers is that:
                          a. section 13 applies to ASTs and SATs; whilst
                          b. section 22 applies only to ASTs.
                          JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                          1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                          2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                          3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                          4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                          Comment


                            #14
                            It seems after various checks with legal people that I can do nothing about this so just to advise you all that a solicitor who specialises in contracts has suggested that all my future AST contracts should have a clause in them which says that all tenants agree the market rent is fair and will not pursue any claim to suggest otherwise.
                            I have tried to contact the committee who determined the rent for a reason behind their decision and they said they will post me their reasons in the next 2-3weeks!!!! Very helpful!!!
                            I can only assume that they have determined the rent payable at such a reduced rent based on 3 people living in the house, even though it is a 4 bedroomed property(and I mean 4 bedroomed, not including any ground floor lounge!) because 3 of them agreed to pay for the rent to be split between them as they didnt have a fourth person. So anyone deciding to do that, please beware!!

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by scholland View Post
                              It seems after various checks with legal people that I can do nothing about this so just to advise you all that a solicitor who specialises in contracts has suggested that all my future AST contracts should have a clause in them which says that all tenants agree the market rent is fair and will not pursue any claim to suggest otherwise.
                              That will not work. The parties cannot oust the Court's jurisdiction.
                              JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                              1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                              2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                              3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                              4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Reply to Flat rental bathroom query
                                by Landyman
                                Are you saying that the toilet and basin are out in the open, adjacent to the kitchen? Or are they in a separate room?

                                Does the room have a window? Or a fan ventilator?

                                It's had to visualise exactly what you mean. Could you sketch a simple floorplan and upload that here p...
                                16-01-2022, 23:47 PM
                              • Flat rental bathroom query
                                by NewGuyOne
                                Hello,

                                A rented flat with a toilet (of course) and basin next to the kitchen, and a bedroom with a quite small en suite - shower/basin/rail for towel ... Is this acceptable in a flat - with no additional separate bathroom?

                                Flat consists of 1 bedroom en suite, hallway, lounge,...
                                16-01-2022, 20:13 PM
                              • Reply to Problems with tenant getting work done and not paying me rent
                                by axil23
                                Thank you Lawcruncher.

                                Just so I am not reading the lease wrong. Executed as a deed means that it has to say that and be witnessed by a 3rd party right?...
                                16-01-2022, 23:23 PM
                              • Problems with tenant getting work done and not paying me rent
                                by axil23
                                I have rented my house to a {name removed} who use it to house Asylum seekers from a govt contract. In June the flat roof developed a leak and they asked me to fix it which I did the next day. 6 months later I get a bill for £1900 for scaffolding, asbestos survey, party wall agreement & for some...
                                13-01-2022, 12:05 PM
                              • surrender of lease charges
                                by jshire
                                Hi,
                                I'm trying to assist a family member who is in the process of surrendering a lease on a shared flat (all tenants moving out). The landlord agreed as the reasons were reasonable. He's sent an email stating that there will be costs that the tenants have to meet, charged by the letting agent...
                                16-01-2022, 20:49 PM
                              • Reply to Gas certificate fail
                                by MdeB
                                But if you had a valid certificate when the tenancy started but failed to give it to the tenant, then I believe that providing them with a current certificate before serving S21 will be OK....
                                16-01-2022, 20:30 PM
                              • Gas certificate fail
                                by ReginaPhalangi
                                We've been renting out our property since 2017 and now have given notice to our tenants to leave. However we have just realised that we have failed to get a gas certificate during their tenancy. Is it possible to get the gas certificate now? Would we need to give notice again after we issue the gas...
                                15-01-2022, 20:05 PM
                              • Reply to No Tenancy agreement
                                by MdeB
                                There are a number (of the order of 20) of grounds under which possession can be sought. See the Housing Act 1988.



                                The claim is for the period for which they were paying rent whilst there was no required licence in place, up to a maximum of 12 months. Getting a licence ends...
                                16-01-2022, 19:32 PM
                              • Reply to No Tenancy agreement
                                by MdeB
                                That depends on when the tenancy started.


                                Or, possibly, the one in place when it is given to the tenant. The regulations are ambiguous...
                                16-01-2022, 19:18 PM
                              • Reply to Wales: New Legislation – your roles and responsibilities
                                by steaming
                                4. Antisocial behaviour…..a fair and consistent approach to everyone. No. 4 is then not mentioned in the extended information (click link). Surely this needs explaining in detail or, maybe, they haven’t actually thought further that the nine words used. No surprise.
                                16-01-2022, 19:17 PM
                              Working...
                              X