Notice to evict: Urgent help please.

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Notice to evict: Urgent help please.

    I hope somebody can help me with this please.

    I have a flat in a private development of 235 flats. All the flat owners own the freehold and are equal shareholders. There is the management company consisting of 6 directors and a company of managing agents are employed to run the affairs on the instructions of the members of the board. I have been letting out the flat for the last 2 years to 2 very decent and polite young ladies. They keep the flat in tip top condition and the rent is in my bank account every month on the dot. In short, I couldn't ask for better tenants.

    Yesterday, I received a letter from the managing agents that it has been brought to their notice that my tenants are running a business from the flat and that it is a breach of T&C of the head lease. I have been told to tell them to either stop running the business, but if they don't, I have to evict them within 7 days. I spoke to my tenants this morning, they agree that they run a mail order business from the flat but it should not worry anybody. No customers are allowed to come to the flat. The only reason the directors of the board have found out is that some times there are return parcels left with the concierge addressed in the business name.

    I read out the letter to them over the phone and told them it is the management have a problem and not me. However, to safeguard myself, my tenancy agreement with them does forbid them running a business from the premises, same wording as in the head lease. They said that they can't stop running the business as it is their bread and butter and there is no way they can move out within 7 days but if given a couple of months notice, will do their best to find alternative accommodation. I just don't know what to do, if they refuse to move out within 7 days which is what I'm asked to do in the management notice. I can't just pick up their belongings and kick them out on the road. I'm sure I will get arrested for doing that. On the other hand if I don't get them out within 7 days, I don't know where I stand with the management, have no idea what action they can take against me.

    What I'm finding very difficult to understand is that how is the management agent allowed to send out such a notice demanding an eviction within 7 days. It is clear it can not be done but would the letter making such a demand not be considered illegal, if they refuse to move out and the case goes to the court? I will be very grateful if you could please help if you have legal knowledge on this kind of situation.

    From what I am led to believe you cannot stop anyone from earning a living and what they are doing appears to sound no different from someone sell lots of items on ebay for example.

    As for the 7 days notice to quit...........slightly wrong im sure!

    Im certainly not the best person to give advice but perhaps on monday other members may be able to help you.


      Unfortunately, it is not only your tenants that are in breach of T&C of their AST, but also you for allowing your flat to be running a business in breach of the head lease.

      Suggest you write back to the Managing company, to state that as your tenants are sub-tenants, the LAW on Ast's requires you to give 2 months notice, and that you are happy to comply with the Managing companies request, and say, but you must obey the law, and you hope that the running of a business will no longer a problem for the M/C in 2 months time, and you have given them 2 months notice, as is required by the Housing act ( Subject to their current AST break clause, or periodic lease ( no AST agreement )

      They don't need to know if your tenents have a valid AST revised every six months / 12 months, or that it lapsed into a periodic lease, just try above.

      7 days is a shock tactic.

      Be thankful they are not giving you, 7 days notice.


        [QUOTE=ram;197903]Unfortunately, it is not only your tenants that are in breach of T&C of their AST, but also you for allowing your flat to be running a business in breach of the head lease.

        First of all, thank you both for your thoughts.

        My AST states very clearly that the premises will only be used as a private dwelling and the tenant will not be allowed to run a business from the property.

        Now yesterday was the first time I learnt that my tenants are running a mail order business from there, I can't see how I can be held breaching the head lease. The tenants have not denied what they are doing but there's no way I get them out so quickly. Even after 2 months notice has passed, its no guarantee that they will have found suitable alternative and I may have to go to the court to get them out.

        What is really making me mad is that surely by asking me to evict the tenants within 7 days, I'm being told to do something which is unlawful. I would have thought that the management agents could get into trouble for this 7 days notice letter, which I'm sure is not permitted by the law of the land.


          Originally posted by satwant
          I can't see how I can be held breaching the head lease. evict the tenants within 7 days,
          You have a lease, your teneants have an AST.

          If a legal document says YOU cannot run a business from your flat, and a business is clearly operating from YOUR flat, you are in breach of the headlease, irrespective if you did not know, or have only just found out.

          Many landlords give their tenants 2 months notice throughout the year and your tenents knew they were not allowed to run a business, especialy when they now have a "Business name", and probably a web site quoting YOUR address ? for return of goods.

          What happens if the business goes under, and they leave, and have hundreds of claims for receiving money but not supplying goods, and summonses coming to your address for fraud, or court summonses to your flat.
          The head lease is to prevent Mr. Plumber or Mr go-cart supplier from having his van parked outside and storing his goods / transporting goods through the premises, thereby making it into commercial storage premises ( be it mail order only ) - The list is endless.

          I wish the 7 days notice was real, as I am about to do something similar, but am sueing the owner for transgressions by his tenants, as the owner is responsible to observe the head lease.

          The Management company receive their directions from the 6 directors, when required to ) and if the 6 directors live in the building, suggest you write to them stating the nice young ladies just take parcels to the post office, and are not plumbers or drain cleaners etc, and can they see their way to let the ladies stay, provided the ladies have all mail sent and received via a Post office box.

          However, in light of the "What happens if " - - you must tell them to stop running a busines there, or leave, but if they can give you an undertaking not to run a business from there and get some office space, that could also apease the Management company, in that a business is no longer operating from your premises.

          Hope this helps, to either see that you must not break any lease, or find a way to observe the lease and your tenants can stay.




            All that is well and good, agreed that the tenant and I are both in breach of the head lease.

            Thank god the ladies are only running a mail order, it could have been worst than this, they could have had clients coming over to the flat for other services and could have been advertising for these services in the local press. They dont want to stop running the business and want time to move out.

            You say you are in a similar situation with an owner, do you expect the owner to physically kick his tenants out and get arrested?

            The help I want is if somebody can point out to me if there is a law that allows an owner of a flat to evict his tenant within 7 days, even in a situation like this or worst than this.


              Firstly unless your tenants vacate voluntarily and surrender the lease you will need a court order to evict them. If this is mid-term you will need to serve a Section 8 notice and the grounds that you will serve it on will be for a breach of one or more obligations under the tenancy agreement. You will have to prove the breach, so you will need either written or photographic evidence that the tenants are in breach. This is a discretionary ground and you may find that the judge does not find in your favour.

              You will also find that the managing agent is using scare tactics. They too will have to go through a number of legal procedures to find you in breach of your lease (Section 146 of Law of Property Act I believe) and it will take them longer than 7 days.

              My recommendation is that you speak to the managing agents and follow up with an email or letter. Explain that you were unaware that this was the case and that you will proceed with serving notice on the tenants as they will not agree to terminate their business from this address. Explain that this is not a mandatory ground for possession and that if the court finds in their favour you will not be able to terminate until the end of the tenancy term. Ensure that the Section 21 notice is correctly served to expire at the end of the term too.

              Make sure that you get assurances from the managing agent that they will not be issuing proceedings and that you will not be charged any legal or documentation costs in the meantime. Make it clear that you are doing everything you can, keep them posted and copied in on all correspondence and Notices to prove to them that you are doing so.

              Good luck.



                Sorry, still didn't answer the question.

                No, the law does not allow you to evict the tenant in 7 days.



                  That is exactly what I was thinking that there is no law in this country which would allow me to evict my tenants within 7 days, unless I use force to physically evict them.

                  The best I can do is to serve the tenants a 2 months notice starting from the next rent due date, 11 April 2010 and hope that they move out without too much hassle by 10 June 2010. If they don't, I may have to take them to court which can take another couple of months before they are finally out.

                  I'm very angry at the wording of the letter, which I feel has treated me like a 6 years old kid, in fact I feel that they are using bullying tactics. At this stage, I think the letter should have simply asked me to a have a word with my tenants to stop running business, otherwise legal action will be taken.

                  Its the 7 days thing is making me mad, they should know that it is not possible. If they are asking me to do something which is not permitted under the law of this country then what they are asking me to do, must be classified as unlawful.



                    When does the fixed term expire?



                      Just a thought, feel free to shoot down...

                      What if the registered address was elsewhere, then wouldn't your tenants merely be "working from home" which is quite commonplace and within the terms of the lease?



                        They first signed a 12 months AST on 11 November 2007, there was no rent increase on renewal in 2008 due to the financial meltdown but on 11 November 2009, new 12 months, no break clause at 5% rent increase, which they happily agreed.

                        Really very nice tenants, very hard working, keep themselves to themselves and bother no one. I will be very upset to be loosing them. Its a straight 12 months contract but sadly I will be asking them to vacate on grounds that there is breach of contract.

                        I really wish I could take some action against the managing company for employing bullying tactics, asking me to evict the tenants in 7 days. We all know that even the Great Gordon Brown can't get away with bullying people in this country.


                          Originally posted by bullybantam View Post
                          Just a thought, feel free to shoot down...

                          What if the registered address was elsewhere, then wouldn't your tenants merely be "working from home" which is quite commonplace and within the terms of the lease?
                          If the tenants are receiving business parcels at the property then they are conducting a business from there. Registering the company elsewhere does not change that.

                          I agree that this sounds a bit nitpicky on the part of the freeholder; it's not as though they have created huge amounts of extra traffic, or an endless stream of visitors, but that's the way it is. Even people who work from home e.g. designing websites, are apparently in breach of contract which seems ludicrous. Some would argue that it is the thin end of the wedge, I suppose.

                          Perhaps these Ts need to get parcels delivered to the house of a friend or relative who is an OO, and collect each day?
                          'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations


                            I wish the 7 days notice was real, as I am about to do something similar, but am sueing the owner for transgressions by his tenants, as the owner is responsible to observe the head lease.


                            The 7 days notice is real, came in yesterday, but I just cant stop them from running the business or evict them within 7 days. What do I do?


                              My questions really are;

                              1. Is there a way to evict the tenants within 7 days? if yes, then how do I go about it?

                              2. If there isn't a way within the UK legal system, which allows eviction within 7 days then are the management being heavy handed with me by asking me to do something illegal?

                              I am not really looking for suggestions that I should speak to the directors or the tenants register elsewhere or have the returns sent elsewhere. However, thank you very much everybody with all the super ideas.


                              Latest Activity


                              • Reply to Joint tenancy agreement, 1 tenant has already moved out
                                by DoricPixie
                                In the opening post you said there was 6 month fixed term AST with both your niece and her now-ex-partner named as joint tenants. Now you are saying there was never a tenancy agreement drawn up.

                                With the benefit of hindsight it would have been better if you'd had your niece pay money into...
                                27-10-2021, 06:33 AM
                              • Joint tenancy agreement, 1 tenant has already moved out
                                by Yorkie2020
                                Good evening all,

                                I wonder if I could get some advice on ending an AST tenancy in England.

                                Originally a 6 month AST last Sept between my niece and her partner, I foolishly listed both on the AST as joint tenants and didn't list him as a permitted, there was no deposit paid....
                                20-10-2021, 19:44 PM
                              • Reply to Joint tenancy agreement, 1 tenant has already moved out
                                by Yorkie2020
                                Guess I've been very lucky this time. My niece has informed her partner that she is ending the tenancy and signing up for a new one in her name only and he is ok with it. She did point out that he will no longer be responsible for any more rent or bills when it's totally in her name.
                                27-10-2021, 02:02 AM
                              • Reply to Increasing rent
                                by jpkeates
                                There may be something on the NRLA website, but I don't know of a standard template.

                                To be honest that clause doesn't seem to help you a lot, it stops you using a s13 notice (I'd wrongly assumed that because it said "may" you'd be able to) but doesn't actually help you with an...
                                26-10-2021, 17:37 PM
                              • Increasing rent
                                by Berlingogirl
                                Tenancy start date May 2020 in England. 6 month initial AST.
                                My tenancy agreement says
                                “The landlord may increase the rent after the first 52 weeks of the tenancy…..”
                                Is there a specific form I should use?...
                                26-10-2021, 13:33 PM
                              • Reply to Increasing rent
                                by Berlingogirl
                                Thanks jpkeates, I looked at the form 13 but that’s for if you don’t have anything in your tenancy agreement with regard to a rent increase. Is there a pro forma for a rent increase if there is a condition in your TA?
                                26-10-2021, 17:05 PM
                              • Reply to Increasing rent
                                by jpkeates
                                If the tenancy is now an SPT, and you want to be ever so formal (and impose the increase without any agreement), search for form 13 (which is called something else on the government's tenancy forms page).

                                Otherwise, you just need to get the tenant to agree and start paying the new rent...
                                26-10-2021, 13:58 PM
                              • Reply to Advanced rent and S21 Notices
                                by jpkeates
                                It is quite likely that the 2 additional months might be seen as a deposit, unless the tenancy agreement is very specific about the initial payment being for months 1, 5 and 6.

                                If it is a deposit, you won't be able to use a s21 notice without returning it and the deposit will be unlawful...
                                26-10-2021, 08:35 AM
                              • Advanced rent and S21 Notices
                                by Shorif908
                                Hi All,

                                I have recently had new tenants move in.
                                the estate agent did the whole thing and put them in.

                                The arrangement with rent payments was this. 6 months AST Tennants pay last 3 months rent in advance and then make 3 monthly payments in advance. Ie start of the month....
                                26-10-2021, 08:06 AM
                              • Reply to Advanced rent and S21 Notices
                                by Lesney Park
                                BUT to answer your question, yes the 3 months very much look like an unlawful deposit, being for a non-defined period (the last 3 months of a tenancy). If it is for a specific 3 months, its a bit lesss grey but then I'm wondering what you hope to achieve...
                                26-10-2021, 08:35 AM