Used MCOL not N208 - Next step?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Used MCOL not N208 - Next step?

    The very brief background on the story is that my other half rented a cottage with her sister seven months ago.

    Over the winter the boiler failed nearly every other day, and the LL 'fixed' it every time, only for it to break 24-48 hrs later. Skip a few months and they finally had enough an told him fix it or discount the rent. He got angry and intimidated the both of them, shouted he will give them two months notice.

    They handed their notice in the next morning, and then found out he never used a TDS, as I used MCOL a while back for the same problem ( I settled without going further in the end ) I recommended them taking it further using TDS.

    He acknowledge the letter and inspected the now empty house, and has made a long list of very petty issues with what needs fixing and what he will claim for.

    Today the girls received this letter.

    hxxp://yfrog.com/j3dscf1120pj

    My girlfriend did solely sign, yet both the girl where present, but he stated it would only need the one signature. As far as the council tax goes, everything is legit, and the sister is a full time student.
    He has been accepting rent from my gf account, and the sister paying my gf.


    Sadly it was my fault they submitted the MCOL not the now relevant N208, and now seem to be a bit puzzled about the best step to take next.

    Do we proceed with the MCOL, or forfeit and start a new N208, but with the added bagged of the LL claims against the girls?
    I find the LL a obnoxious and intimidating charlatan, and would like to pursue this further, so I assume it's bite the bullet and occur some ££ lawyer costs if we want to fight him?

    #2
    Just had some quick photos of the original contract and it seems like a very old 1996 version of the Housing Act drafted agreement. And the fact that it states in this agreement that he will hold the deposit, and makes no mention of the DPS would therefore once again means he has fallen short?

    I also had a quick look and found a 4.3.2. ( Section 4 is ending agreement ) that states that if the Tenant breaches any conditions, and refused to pay the LL reasonable compensation AFTER being told by writing of the breach it can be ended.

    That to me sound like if he plays the " I didn't agree that both where tenants" then they can quash it by asking for a copy of the letter sent regarding the breach.

    I'm that angry now, with the added fact my girlfriend is getting very upset, I'm considering footing the bill to get a good lawyer on the case asap, as from a non legal mind I see a load of little counter-play cropping up.

    Comment


      #3
      Are the girls trying to claim for deposit protection non-compliance? (I'm assuming so from the mention of form N208 -v- MCOL).

      If your girlfriend is the sole tenant named on the AST, then the claim should not have been issued with both girls as co-claimant (again I'm assuming from what you've said). And, as you also seem to be aware, claims for non-compliance should be issued on form N208.

      It is possible that the defendant may be able to claim their costs if your girlfriend discontinues the claim. But only their costs up to the date of discontinuance. It is also possible that you may be able to apply to amend the claim. You could also do nothing and see what happens (inadvisable).

      However, be aware that there was a high court case last month, therefore binding on lower courts, Draycott -v- Hannells. The judgment said that the penalty does not apply if the deposit is protected late with the DPS. This gives the defendant a very easy route to avoid the penalty, assuming the tenancy is still current and has not formally ended (otherwise, it might be slightly greyer territory).

      The solicitor's letter is typical of its genre, designed to threaten and intimidate you into discontinuance. However, in this case it might be advisable to back down; if you are not inclined to do so, you should seek legal advice, because if your gf proceeds and loses, your gf could be liable for all the defendant's legal costs.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Chilled View Post
        Just had some quick photos of the original contract and it seems like a very old 1996 version of the Housing Act drafted agreement. And the fact that it states in this agreement that he will hold the deposit, and makes no mention of the DPS would therefore once again means he has fallen short?
        Read the statute, link below. There is no requirement to mention deposit protection in the tenancy agreement. Albeit one of the three schemes - the TDS - requires clauses to be included in the TA, but that comes under the heading of the scheme's "initial requirements".

        http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2004..._en_19#pt6-ch4

        I also had a quick look and found a 4.3.2. ( Section 4 is ending agreement ) that states that if the Tenant breaches any conditions, and refused to pay the LL reasonable compensation AFTER being told by writing of the breach it can be ended.

        That to me sound like if he plays the " I didn't agree that both where tenants" then they can quash it by asking for a copy of the letter sent regarding the breach.
        I've no idea what you're driving at. Either both girls are named on the TA or not. If not, then the other one isn't a tenant. Breach of contract doesn't come into it.

        Comment

        Latest Activity

        Collapse

        • Reply to Money Claim Telephone Hearing
          by OS7
          Thanks so much. The defendants are already throwing in a lot of rubbish at me now, I can’t wait to see what they will say in front of the judge. I will probably keep my mouth shut and ignore whatever they are spinning.

          when you explained the case, did the Judge ask for any clarifications....
          18-10-2021, 20:41 PM
        • Money Claim Telephone Hearing
          by rapid111111
          S21 was issued, tenants left, has 9 months rent arrears amounting to over 10k+. The hearing review (which I wasn't called for or required to attend) progressed onto a money claim telephone hearing which is coming up as there was no longer a need for a possession claim. So I guess that means everything...
          12-10-2021, 09:55 AM
        • Reply to Rent Increase
          by Ted.E.Bear
          Things have been very volatile lately, I suspect partly due to the uncertainty amongst students over the summer having a knock-on effect.
          Rents were much lower a couple of months ago, then shot up near the start of term, they may not stay as high.

          You may get £800, for 3 months,...
          18-10-2021, 20:38 PM
        • Rent Increase
          by TREK
          I am a landlord and have been letting a property out to tenants for £600 PCM for 4 years with no rent increases, i have not had my eye on the ball for 18 months and have just found out that very similar properties in the area are going for £800 PCM. What is the maximum i could raise the rent at the...
          18-10-2021, 17:22 PM
        • Reply to Rent Increase
          by landlord-man
          But you'd still be doing yourself out of £1,800 per year.

          You're going to waste another 3 years after that getting to todays market rent of £800 - which by then will probably be £900+

          You're missing out on a few nice holidays or the cost in redecorating, recarpeting your...
          18-10-2021, 20:30 PM
        • Reply to TDS requiring court order
          by landlord-man
          If they vacated in March, isnt mid October a little late to be asking for help.

          I take it you have new tenants now.

          YOU made the mistake (which we all do) but you should just accept it, learn from it and move on.

          By all means offer them 50% of their deposit...
          18-10-2021, 20:20 PM
        • TDS requiring court order
          by memkad
          Hello all,

          As an amateur landlord, I have made quite a big mistake.

          I’ve let a house to a limited company and used an AST template from the Law Society, not realising that the document is not valid for use with companies.

          All was well until March this year when...
          18-10-2021, 18:15 PM
        • Reply to Rent Increase
          by TREK
          I have no intention of evicting my tenants but funny you should mention £50 per month as i thought that would be a reasonable amount as well....
          18-10-2021, 20:07 PM
        • Reply to Rent Increase
          by jpucng62
          I would suggest you might get away with £50 pcm increase with an explanation that a rent has not gone up for 4 years so there needs to be a significant rent rise. Then £25 cpm each year until you have caught up bit. Seems unfair to evict tenants for you taking you eye off the ball!
          18-10-2021, 19:59 PM
        • Reply to Rent Increase
          by TREK
          Landlords are actually getting £800 as there is a massive demand in the area as very few properties available for rent, the market has gone crazy, £1200 for a 3 bed semi in Liverpool....
          18-10-2021, 19:19 PM
        Working...
        X