Letting a leasehold flat

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Letting a leasehold flat

    First post from prospective newbie "reluctant landlord". Hi.

    Getting really annoyed now.

    I'm jumping through all the hoops, have been doing everything by the book. I have managed to find two people to share the tenancy, one of whom I've known for several years, the other has been my lodger for a couple of months (and they've both known each other for several years). I'm getting all the legal stuff done, like EPC, and GSC. I have permission from the mortgage company.

    The final hurdle (other than the tenancy agreement, which would be in hand) is permission from the freeholder (in my case, the council). I spoke to them and they told me that it was a formality really. I told them it was to a couple of friends and she asked if they were students. I said no (entirely truthful) and she said that's good as I wouldn't have been allowed to let to students.

    The formality is a form.

    Which says (their bold):

    "Under the terms of the Lease the property may be sub-let to a single person, couple or a family. It must not be sub-let to separate, unrelated individuals e.g. students."

    Arrrrrggh!

    So what would you do now? Would you press on anyway? Or would you try to deal with the bureaucracy and ask for permission to have two "unrelated" but entirely stable, mid to high earning, IT/Professionals in?

    The irony is, either one could take it on their own and the council would give me the thumbs up. But I can't have one of them take it and the other sublet as this would be against my mortgage conditions.

    What can the leaseholder do? Can they "evict" me, take me to court, force me to sell? What other pitfalls are there? (I'm aware that as leaseholder, I am responsible for the behaviour of the tenants and that any action would be against me - but given that there were some right nasty pieces of work downstairs being rented to, and the council were fine, I don't have any worries that my tenants would be an issue in that regard. They're decent, and quiet.

    Hell one of the tenants I have lined up used to rent the flat downstairs. On their own and was a model tenant.

    How sympathetic are they likely to be? Or are they unlikely to be able to be sympathetic at all?

    Am a bit gutted as this has a huge personal effect on my personal plans.

    Thanks.

    #2
    Er, did you not read (and did no solicitor explain) the lease's contents, before you purchased it?
    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
      Er, did you not read (and did no solicitor explain) the lease's contents, before you purchased it?
      When I bought it (3 years ago) it was as a home for me, with no intention of ever renting it out, so it never crossed my mind to worry about what circumstances I'd be able to rent it out. Obviously hindsight, etc.

      Fast forward 3 years, circumstances have changed significantly and I have three options really. Rent out. Sell (at a loss). Break up with my partner (met long after I bought). Circumstances mean that she can't move here - this is the easier property to dispose of.

      Obviously if the council are immovable, then I have to let my prospective tenants down (no contracts signed yet- though it also would mean moving the lodger out) and find someone else but it's difficult and expensive running two households.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Andrewd View Post
        ... But I can't have one of them take it and the other sublet as this would be against my mortgage conditions.
        Are you sure?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Preston View Post
          Are you sure?
          Yeah, it was part of the conditions of the consent to let. (that's what I meant rather than a condition of the mortgage, sorry).

          After discussions, they have agreed that as long as it's a single tenancy agreement/contract, that's all they're interested in.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Andrewd View Post
            The formality is a form.

            Which says (their bold):

            "Under the terms of the Lease the property may be sub-let to a single person, couple or a family. It must not be sub-let to separate, unrelated individuals e.g. students."

            Arrrrrggh!

            So what would you do now? Would you press on anyway? Or would you try to deal with the bureaucracy and ask for permission to have two "unrelated" but entirely stable, mid to high earning, IT/Professionals in?

            The irony is, either one could take it on their own and the council would give me the thumbs up. But I can't have one of them take it and the other sublet as this would be against my mortgage conditions.
            If you let the property to Tenant1, the other (Tenant2) could be taken in by Tenant1 as a lodger - which isn't the same as subletting as the lodger doesn't get exclusive possession of any part of the property. So check whether this would be okay with the mortgage company.

            The downside for T2 is T1 could evict him easily. But if your current lodger is happy being a lodger, he might be okay with that.

            Comment


              #7
              Thanks Westminster, that was my original hope (that my current lodger would become a tenant and then take a lodger). I was advised that it's not a good idea in that the lodger would have no contract with me - so if my tenant left, I'd potentially be a bit stuck.

              I will check with them anyway though, because it might give me a few more options.

              Thank you again!

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Andrewd View Post
                The formality is a form.

                Which says (their bold):

                "Under the terms of the Lease the property may be sub-let to a single person, couple or a family. It must not be sub-let to separate, unrelated individuals e.g. students."
                Also, are you sure this doesn't mean that you can't let as an HMO (house in multiple occupation), i.e. let each bedroom on a separate AST? I would ask the council to clarify whether it means you cannot let to two unrelated people on a single joint tenancy.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Andrewd View Post
                  Thanks Westminster, that was my original hope (that my current lodger would become a tenant and then take a lodger). I was advised that it's not a good idea in that the lodger would have no contract with me - so if my tenant left, I'd potentially be a bit stuck.
                  Advised by whom?

                  If the T left, and the lodger remained, the lodger would be as easy to evict as any other tenant or occupier.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Andrewd View Post
                    The final hurdle (other than the tenancy agreement, which would be in hand) is permission from the freeholder (in my case, the council). I spoke to them and they told me that it was a formality really. I told them it was to a couple of friends and she asked if they were students. I said no (entirely truthful) and she said that's good as I wouldn't have been allowed to let to students.
                    TBH, this person you spoke to sounds as though all they know is what it says on the form, and were just parroting the word students.

                    I find it hard to believe that your lease specifically says you cannot let to students.

                    Read your lease and see what it actually says about subletting.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      The simplest solution that complies with the lease sub-letting stipulation is to let to one tenant and expect that tenant to have a lodger or paying guest. Make sure that the tenant understands not to give the lodger rights other than a licence to lodge with a short notice period.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        I know it's a bit to bump 18 months on but wanted to thank everyone again for their advice. Everything went smoothly and I've now taken the flat back (as my wife and I have decided to use the flat as an opportunity to save for a new deposit as we can make significant savings living there instead of renting).

                        It was a fairly stressful situation at the start, and at the end but it was mostly smooth throughout. I chose to save most of the rental payments and pay the mortgage out of my wages. This worked well and removed all the worry about losing my tenants and needing to pay the mortgage.

                        Although I was a very reluctant landlord, it all worked out, we got married having lived together for a year which might not have happened if I'd chosen to continue living in the flat.

                        Just thought I'd tail this thread off, so others in a similar position to where I was can take the positive experience. It was more than worth doing! I'll do it again if it comes to it.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          What does the relevant clause in your lease say exactly?

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Sorry Lawcruncher, you've probably seen that I was bumping my old thread - I should have realised the confusion that may ensue (and sadly it's not possible to edit the opening post).

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Glad it all worked out well!

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Partner as Permitted occupier worries
                                Lauren 1234
                                Hi all

                                Apologies if this has been answered somewhere but u have looked everywhere and can' find an answer!!

                                My current landlord is selling their property so I have put an app in for a new one. I have been renting on my own for three years and not caused any problems my credit...
                                21-01-2018, 12:28 PM
                              • Reply to Partner as Permitted occupier worries
                                mariner
                                Credit ref checks are only required for signatory Ts or Guarantor, but as LL I would credit ref anyone wishing to reside in my property. Explain to LL/LA in writng (dated) that you apply as sole T, but you wish your named partner/bf as permtted occupier. LL can reject your T applicaiion.
                                22-01-2018, 01:49 AM
                              • tenant hasn't paid last months rent
                                ferrari-airwolf
                                Hi there I am in a bit of a weird situation. Basically, 1 month ago I handed my section 21 notice to the tenant to leave the property. the T should be moving out of the property mid February. The T has always paid on time and kept the house in a good and clean condition. However when I checked to see...
                                21-01-2018, 13:25 PM
                              • Reply to tenant hasn't paid last months rent
                                ferrari-airwolf
                                Thanks for all of the great answers guys.

                                red hitman, I will send a letter first class recorded tomorrow stating that the rent is now a week over due.

                                Boletus, I served the section 21 to get the house back so i could live in it, I gave them two months notice, 4 months into...
                                22-01-2018, 00:49 AM
                              • Landlord/Tenant payment dispute
                                serynos
                                Hi everyone,

                                I’ve rented properties with my family for lots of years. We’ve had the odd minor disagreement here and there with landlords but nothing major and nothing we’ve been unable to resolve ourselves. All in all renting has been quite straightforward and easy as you’d expect...
                                20-01-2018, 21:24 PM
                              • Reply to Landlord/Tenant payment dispute
                                nukecad
                                So to cut the long story short;

                                The accidental fire damaged/moved the oil level gauge, because of this the oil ran out and so the system needed bleeding/resetting.

                                If the resultant damage was entirely casued by the fire, the cost of rectification should be covered by insurance....
                                22-01-2018, 00:07 AM
                              • Reply to Landlord/Tenant payment dispute
                                AndrewDod
                                This is a long story so can I try to summarise -- because it is not entirely clear what you are being asked to pay:

                                Possible summary:

                                The meter on the oil tank was bust. As a result of the bust meter, we ran the tank dry. Air got into the system as a result. I am being presented...
                                21-01-2018, 23:30 PM
                              • Reply to tenant hasn't paid last months rent
                                nukecad
                                That seems poorly worded.

                                The tenant can't agree to use the deposit for rent "in any way or at any time", that TA specifically states that he can't.

                                That doesn't mean that you can't claim unpaid rent against the deposit, just that the tenant can't agree to it....
                                21-01-2018, 23:23 PM
                              • Reply to Partner as Permitted occupier worries
                                AndrewDod
                                Than can refuse or not for whatever (legal) reason they like.

                                CCJs are not binary things. As a landlord I would want the FULL details of what exactly the CCJ was about, with evidence.

                                It is fairly hard to stop you from taking on a lodger, but if landlord feels hoodwinked they...
                                21-01-2018, 23:20 PM
                              • Reply to tenant hasn't paid last months rent
                                boletus
                                Depends on why you served the section 21.

                                Are they in breach of the tenancy agreement?

                                If you are selling up, why didn't you give a lot more amicable notice?

                                If you just woke up one morning and decided to serve it on a whim I would be very interested....
                                21-01-2018, 20:18 PM
                              Working...
                              X