Clause in Conveyance Document - can I rent the property out?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Clause in Conveyance Document - can I rent the property out?

    I have just recently purchased a 1st floor flat (freehold) through an auction. My solicitor made me aware of a clause on the property which has caused me some concern.

    Under Restrictions and Stipulations to be observed and performed by the Purchasers its states the following clause:

    " Not to use the the upperflat save as a single private dwelling house and not to take in lodgers"

    Her view was that because the property had been rented out previously that this may not be enforceable, however I am not sure if we have fully understood this clause.

    The flat is part of an old Victorian property which consists of a house, a groundfloor flat and my flat a two bedroom first floor. This is a freehold property.

    Any advice would be most helpful.

  • #2
    See http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums...ad.php?t=26387, considering this very point.
    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

    Comment


    • #3
      Jeffery, many thanks for your response, however can such clause restrict a freehold property from rented out?

      Comment


      • #4
        Whether freehold or leasehold the words mean the same.

        Let's take it in two halves.

        Not to use the the upperflat save as a single private dwelling house

        You can only use the property for residential purposes and only in such way that no one would say it was two or more dwellings. You can certainly let it on a single tenancy.

        not to take in lodgers

        That means exactly what it says. Anyone who lives in the flat, whether or not a tenant, cannot take in paying guests.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by worriedlandlord View Post
          " Not to use the the upperflat save as a single private dwelling house and not to take in lodgers"

          Her view was that because the property had been rented out previously that this may not be enforceable, however I am not sure if we have fully understood this clause.
          Subletting the whole of the premises (to, for example, an assured shorthold tenant) who then occupies the flat as a single private dwelling house would not, it seems to me, be in breach of the requirement quoted above.

          It would, however, be necessary to consider this clause in the context of the whole agreement and of the letting arrangement which you propose to be sure that you will not be in breach of the agreement. For example, if there are clauses prohibiting sub letting or the running of a business from the premises, you may or may not have an issue depending upon the detail of the arrangements you put in place. The link referred to by Jeffrey touches briefly on these issues.

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • NTQ during fixed term?
            vpltd
            Hi,
            Can a LL issue a valid NTQ during the six-month fixed term of an AST agreement?
            (A residential let in England.)
            VPL.
            11-08-2017, 14:53 PM
          • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
            jjlandlord
            You made a claim. You tell us.



            It was claimed that a tenant may freely leave whenever he pleases once he has received a s.21notice. If that was indeed the case you can imagine the mess with all those precautionary notices....
            18-08-2017, 12:43 PM
          • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
            Wright76
            I totally agree, I was just trying to find any justification for claims that a tenant must serve notice in return of a section 21. It could never ever be demanded within the 2 month notice period, and in my opinion I agree it couldn't be demanded thereafter. But JJlandlord is adamant that requirement...
            18-08-2017, 12:40 PM
          • Lying tenant
            mazco
            We had a tenant in our property. Initial agreement was for 6 months from April 2016 but then went on to SPT.
            In June he didn't pay his rent due on 15th of the month. Chased him and got excuses. On 10th July got a text from him saying he had moved out and left a key under the mat for us. He reckoned...
            18-08-2017, 12:03 PM
          • Reply to Lying tenant
            JK0
            Hmm. If tenant was stupid enough to leave valuable furniture behind, it's JK0's money in my book.

            (Not that that ever happened. All I get left is broken Ikea tat.)
            18-08-2017, 12:30 PM
          • Reply to Lying tenant
            jpkeates
            The deposit doesn't limit what you can try and recover from the tenant.
            It's simply a convention designed to make a simple claim easier.

            You can't sell the tenant's goods and use the proceeds to settle their debt without their consent.
            That's the tenant's money.
            18-08-2017, 12:27 PM
          • Reply to Lying tenant
            mazco
            Unfortunately the deposit doesn't come close to what he already owes. Deposit of just over £1100 to cover two months rent at £900 per month, replacement carpet £200, bath replacement needed, disposal of rubbish, clearing of garden. He 'kindly' left us some furniture which I managed to sell for around...
            18-08-2017, 12:24 PM
          • Reply to Lying tenant
            jpkeates
            And, of course, this....
            18-08-2017, 12:22 PM
          • Reply to Lying tenant
            jpkeates
            There are rules about who is responsible for the council tax. And they relate to residence, not the tenancy.
            If the tenant is in the fixed term of a tenancy agreement, that means they're liable.
            If they are in a rolling agreement and move out, you are liable.

            If the tenancy...
            18-08-2017, 12:21 PM
          • Reply to Lying tenant
            JK0
            I'd forget about getting utilites to believe you. Just work out a reasonable extra amount to add to deposit request.
            18-08-2017, 12:18 PM
          Working...
          X