Witholding part of deposit

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Witholding part of deposit

    Hi everyone...

    Sorry - bit of a long one!

    Hoping you can help with some advice... we've just moved out of a property where we have been good tenants. We've utilised the break clause because I'm pregnant (we advertised and found replacement tenants within a fortnight, and there was no void in the rent).

    Anyway, when we signed the contract at the start of the lease, my husband questioned the part that said the flat needed to be "professionally cleaned" upon our departure. We were told verbally that it just meant "to a professional standard" and that if we cleaned it well enough ourselves, that would be fine.

    After confirming our departure date, we received a letter from the agent stating the procedure for moving out, and stating that the place needed to be cleaned to a "professional standard". The agent also recommended a cleaning company to us via email, but I thanked them and told them that we intended to do the cleaning ourselves (we received no response regarding this).

    So upon our departure, I cleaned the place absolutely spotless... the independent inventory guy who did the check-out even said it looked like we had left it in a better state than we found it.

    On his report, he marks the state of the cleaning as "good" when it was only "fair/good" when we moved in (it had apparently been professionally cleaned before we moved in". Nowhere in the report does he make any mention of the cleaning being not good enough - the only mention of cleaning is where he states that each appliance and area had been cleaned.

    The only thing marked as damaged in the report compared to the check-in report was damage to the bed base, which we have accepted and are happy to pay for.

    The agent then visited the property following the check-out report and sent me an email with a list of damage (all of which were already present on the original check-in report!) and stating that because the place had not been professionally cleaned, we would need to pay £175 for cleaning.

    We have been corresponding, and I have explained we are not happy to pay this as there was no need for extra cleaning (according to the independent inventory) and we had previously agreed that "to a professional standard" was acceptable.

    The agent has dropped reference to the other list of things, but is sticking to his claim that we need to pay £175 for professional cleaning. In his last email, he added an extra £90 for the inventory check-out report (the one he is choosing to ignore!).

    I'm about to lodge a small claims court claim for the full deposit, minus the cost of the bed base - I just thought I'd see what opinions or advice I could get first from you lovely people.

    Any thoughts? Does the verbal agreement and the subsequent check-out letter quoting "to a professional standard" support our claim, or does the fact that we signed the lease (which states "professionally cleaned") override that?


  • #2
    You sound like dream tenants so dig yr heels in & don't pay. Sorry I can't comment on yr legal standing but the inventories support yr case.
    My last prof cleaning bill (as a landlord in SW London, 2 bed 2 bath flat) was 80 GBP & there's loads of desperate people looking for work so I'd pay less next time.
    Good luck but don't give in - those agents are looking at us like cash machines!


    • #3
      Thanks Poolboy... that's what's so annoying - I think we've been really good tenants!

      I've checked our lease, and it says we are to pay for the checkout fee, so I guess we have to wear the extra £90...

      One further question - there was a hole (about 20cm round) in the base of the divan bed (i think by big pregnant self stood on it to remove the lampshade when we were cleaning!). They're claiming £94 for a replacement bed base.... do we have to replace it, or pay compensation towards the eventual replacement (the bed was otherwise new and I wouldn't have imagined that the whole base needed replacing??)

      thanks again.


      • #4
        Originally posted by shufflebunny View Post
        The agent has dropped reference to the other list of things, but is sticking to his claim that we need to pay £175 for professional cleaning. In his last email, he added an extra £90 for the inventory check-out report (the one he is choosing to ignore!).

        I think that if the inventory clerk was happy with the condition of the flat you are right to resist the professional cleaning charge, however it is normal for the tenant to pay the cost of the check out. The LL pays for the check in inventory, unless your contract says differently of course.

        It is normal to pay a percentage of any damaged goods depending on how much use they have had, in the case of a divan bed base I should think they only last about five years, so if it was already a year old then offer them 80% of the new cost.
        I offer no guarantee that anything I say is correct. wysiwyg


        • #5
          If you haven't done so already, it may be worth querying with the LL/Agent what specifically they do not consider to have been cleaned to a professional standard. My experience of tenant's cleaning has that it has not been to a good standard, even where they say that is the case, but I have always been able to point to and evidence specific failings which they would have to do anyway. At the very least, this may to narrow areas of disagreement.


          Latest Activity


          • What brand/price point for washer/dryer would you recommend?
            As a landlord what approach do you take to replacing white goods in your rental properties?
            Do you buy cheapest brands and then dispose of them when they go wrong as it is pricey to repair?
            Or do you go for a better brand and hope for longevity?
            My repair man recommends buying the...
            22-07-2017, 08:48 AM
          • Reply to What brand/price point for washer/dryer would you recommend?
            Horses for courses.

            I've never been able to get a fridge repaired, they only have one working system and when it breaks it's time for a new fridge, so I buy the cheapest one that fits with a name I've heard of.

            Washing machines can be repaired, so I pay more for one that has...
            22-07-2017, 10:27 AM
          • Claiming for protected deposit
            This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
            Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
            I served the...
            21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
          • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
            That would be pointless.

            The tenant would have to sue to get their own money back.
            Apart from the waste of the court and tenant's time, there would be little or no compensation because the tenant would suffer no loss to compensate them for (loss of interest?).
            The only people...
            22-07-2017, 10:23 AM
          • Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
            Q1 – Where is the rented property located (England / Wales / Scotland / N Ireland)?

            Q2 – What type of Tenancy Agreement (TA) is this e.g. sole tenant / multiple tenant / room only?

            Q3 – What date did current TA start dd/mm/yy?
            21-07-2017, 15:06 PM
          • Reply to Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
            Your right that the penalty claim is the law and it's your right to claim it.

            Unfortunately however you won't receive much sympathy on here,as most of us recognise that most of the breaches have been made by inexperienced landlords and not through any intention to rip you off.
            22-07-2017, 10:18 AM
          • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
            The legislation has been in place for a decade and has been revisited at least twice (and tweaked each time).
            The deposit schemes have fairly clear guides about what needs to be done and how and when to do it.

            Given the tenant(s) the Prescribed Information is part of the process of...
            22-07-2017, 10:17 AM
          • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
            It discourages landlords from taking a deposit at all, and instead making it up with higher rent. This discriminates against tenants staying for a long time.

            I think that is what is happening to o/p.

            It's all a lot of nonsense. Tenant could always sue if landlord...
            22-07-2017, 10:12 AM
          • Reply to What brand/price point for washer/dryer would you recommend?
            I buy the cheapest machine I can source. It is usually a Hotpoint or Indesit. And they all come out of the same factory. Some of them last for years. I've just replaced a Hotpoint WD after 11 years with a new Indesit one. I try and avoid the ones with the digital display and too many fancy options as...
            22-07-2017, 10:09 AM
          • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
            What’s evident from responses in this thread that equal emphasis was given to deposit protected within time frame and T were informed in a prescribed manner, some going as far as getting the T to sign the acknowledgement!
            I am really flabbergasted to read some of these emphasis, surely the point...
            22-07-2017, 10:07 AM