HMO tenant wont sign contract

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • HMO tenant wont sign contract

    Hi, hope someone can help me.

    I have a newly acquired HMO. Tenant has been living in one of the rooms for over 20 yrs, is a assured tenant (even though he's signed several ASTs during his time there). The last AST was signed in 2008. I acquired the HMO recently, gave every tenant new contracts. Everyone has signed them except for the assured tenant. Assured tenant isn't happy that I issued a rental increase (used the right notice etc). He has accepted the new rental rate but isn't happy about signing a new contract, he's told me he's being difficult as he's not happy that i've increased his rent.
    I know that his last AST is still 'rolling'. Only difference between last contract and new one is that the new one states that his weekly rent is inclusive of all bills. The 'rolling' contract states that he has to pay extra for bills (although his last lanndlord didn't charge him any extra). Being a new landlord would I be able to tell him that if he sticks to his rolling contract than I'm within my right to charge him extra to cover his proportion of council tax, utility bills etc? Would he have anyy grounds to argue that the last landlord didn't do that even though on paper the rolling contract states that the landlord can?

    Any advice would be very gratefully received

  • #2
    Also I do know that unfortunately the tenant is still assured even though they signed ASTs.... i'm guessing if I ever took him to court for eviction he could claim that he didn't realise he was giving up assured tenancy rights by signing ASTs... my lawyer has said that courts tend to side with the tenants in these situations


    • #3
      I am wondering whether I have missed your point, because if I were your tenant I don't think I would sign your proposed new contract either. What is in it for him? He certainly doesn't have to sign if he doesn't want to.

      By the way, you mention that you have served a proper notice if increase, but that may not be the case if the old rent was exclusive of services and your notice assumes that it is inclusive.


      Latest Activity


      • if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
        Our 6 month short term assured tenancy agreement ended on the 2nd August. We are with a reputable agency. We were invited to renew for a further 6 months back in July and were asked to email our confirmation that we wish to renew in writing. This I did. We were sent the renewal tenancy to sign. We have...
        22-08-2017, 14:00 PM
      • Reply to if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
        I would say your original AST continues as SPT.
        If now a new verbal AST, you may have a new fixed term and you cannot serve NTQ during fixed term (6 months?).
        Talk to LL directly, rather than LA.
        Why did you agree to a new AST, rather than request rolling over to SPT....
        23-08-2017, 00:30 AM
      • 6 year deposit claim
        Hi guys, I know that a tenant can claim a penalty on an unprotected deposit but I just wondered when the 6 year clock starts ticking.
        22-08-2017, 16:43 PM
      • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
        As memory fades over time, can someone provide a 'sticky' for dates when key elements of LL&T Legislation changed? I believe Apr 2012 predates later deposit timescales.
        23-08-2017, 00:08 AM
      • NTQ during fixed term?
        Can a LL issue a valid NTQ during the six-month fixed term of an AST agreement?
        (A residential let in England.)
        11-08-2017, 14:53 PM
      • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
        It's worth noting that guidance is under part 4 where tenant obviously is given notice to end of a period and therefore apportionment would not be applicable.

        The reference to the notice to quit ending the tenancy on the notice date does not change the fact that it obviously does however,...
        22-08-2017, 23:24 PM
      • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
        I think thats exactly what the section I have just quoted confirms.

        And thereafter, if you choose not to accept they are leaving as a result of the section 21 you must insist on a notice to quit or await a court ordering possession (where you will be ordered to apportion anyway)
        22-08-2017, 23:13 PM
      • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
        A lot of energy has been expended in this debate. It has been suggested a LL has no need to take Court action if T apparently vacates after receiving a s21 but with no Notice. LL cannot safely assume has vacated without Court confirmation, to avoid a T allegation of 'illegal eviction'. Equally I would...
        22-08-2017, 23:00 PM
      • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
        If someone could copy and paste section 21 (4) a and b (I'm really not technical!), the law seems to recognise that a tenancy CAN end as a result of a section 21 and before a possession hearing.

        21(4)b........the tenancy could be brought to an end by notice to quit given by the landlord...
        22-08-2017, 22:38 PM
      • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
        Assuming that the money originally paid had been used as a deposit for the single tenant tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days from when the 2012 tenancy started. And... if that was a fixed term tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days for any subseqent renwal and likewise from when it went periodic.
        22-08-2017, 22:22 PM