List of tenancy deposit arbitration decisions & reasons

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    List of tenancy deposit arbitration decisions & reasons

    Tessa Shepperson has compiled a list of recent decisions by Arbitrators on tenancy deposit disputes and the reasons for the decisions. It can be found here.

    I think its very useful for both LL and Ts.

    #2
    Lost rent during repairs

    Yes, it is interesting.

    As I expected there is never any allowance for the lost rent for the time that repairs take to organise and carry out. This has always been a big bugbear for me.

    Any other landlords feel the same, and has anyone found a solution?

    Comment


      #3
      It is interesting to note that the award of the arbitraror is limited to the amount of the deposit.

      In other words, if damage is £1000 and the deposit is £500 - then the award to the landlord can only be £500 - the arbitraror clearly states in several of the case studies that he or she does not have the power to award more.

      Also quite prevalent is that landlords are not providing sufficient or any evidence to support claims where is it quite clear that if such claims were true, and evidence provided, the landlord would be the winner of the claim. Checkin and checkout inventories with photos appear to be essential.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by jamesknight0 View Post
        Yes, it is interesting.

        As I expected there is never any allowance for the lost rent for the time that repairs take to organise and carry out. This has always been a big bugbear for me.

        Any other landlords feel the same, and has anyone found a solution?
        There is no solution as you are up against section 18 (1) LTA 1927:

        Damages for a breach of a covenant or agreement to keep or put premises in repair during the currency of a lease, or to leave or put premises in repair at the termination of a lease, whether such covenant or agreement is expressed or implied, and whether general or specific, shall in no case exceed the amount (if any) by which the value of the reversion (whether immediate or not) in the premises is diminished owing to the breach of such covenant or agreement as aforesaid...

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by davidjohnbutton View Post
          It is interesting to note that the award of the arbitraror is limited to the amount of the deposit.
          That is because the sole purpose of the arbitration is to determine where the deposit should go.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
            There is no solution as you are up against section 18 (1) LTA 1927:

            Damages for a breach of a covenant or agreement to keep or put premises in repair during the currency of a lease, or to leave or put premises in repair at the termination of a lease, whether such covenant or agreement is expressed or implied, and whether general or specific, shall in no case exceed the amount (if any) by which the value of the reversion (whether immediate or not) in the premises is diminished owing to the breach of such covenant or agreement as aforesaid...
            Thank you Lawcruncher.

            The above seems to be saying that the damages are limited to the difference in value between what the flat is worth in its present state, and what it is worth with the repairs done. I think this is fair enough. I can see that an un-repaired flat could be worth £10,000 less than a repaired one.

            How does that prevent me from claiming lost rent while the repairs are done?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by jamesknight0 View Post
              As I expected there is never any allowance for the lost rent for the time that repairs take to organise and carry out. This has always been a big bugbear for me.

              Any other landlords feel the same, and has anyone found a solution?
              I once brought a county court claim against a tenant who had caused extensive damage, requiring complete redecoration. It took several weeks before the property was ready to relet.

              I didn't claim for this lost time/rent, as it was my first ever claim and it didn't occur to me to do so. However, at the hearing I happened to mention this factor had caused me a loss and the judge said I should have claimed for it, too - which to me suggests that it is a valid, claimable loss arising from T's breach. Other judges may take a different view.

              Comment


                #8
                Interesting list - I have to say the way that case study 35 is explained is particularly flakey!!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by westminster View Post
                  I didn't claim for this lost time/rent, as it was my first ever claim and it didn't occur to me to do so. However, at the hearing I happened to mention this factor had caused me a loss and the judge said I should have claimed for it, too - which to me suggests that it is a valid, claimable loss arising from T's breach. Other judges may take a different view.
                  I agree, I have seen it done a number of times.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    If this list is reasonably representative of the way the adjudication service operates, I have to say that the evidence doesn't really support the common assertion that the results are biased towards the tenant.

                    LL's appear to be easily winning cases where the tenant has broken the contract by leaving early, but losing cases for damage by submitting little or no evidence or (in some cases) outright lying.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Hmm, okay I think we have established that it is possible to get lost rent reimbursed in court if you have a sensible judge. (Oxymoron?)

                      But would you get such a sensible person arbitrating in a tenancy deposit hearing? None of the cases the Landlord won mention any award for lost rent. I think we can assume there was lost rent in these cases, as I doubt that repairs were completed on the day of the checkout.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        I seems prefectly reasonable that the landlord should retain the deposit if the tenant leaves early.

                        Don't landlords ever try and take legal action against a tenant though to try and force them to pay the full period of the tenancy agreement?

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by bfd View Post
                          I seems prefectly reasonable that the landlord should retain the deposit if the tenant leaves early.

                          Don't landlords ever try and take legal action against a tenant though to try and force them to pay the full period of the tenancy agreement?
                          From a practical point of view, there must seem little point in doing this unless the tenant is extremely rich. When tenants break tenancy contracts early and flee, it is usually because they can no longer afford the rent (because of redundancy, or whatever other reason). They must then find somewhere else (even cheaper) to live and pay rent there. The chances of their being able to afford two lots of rent are surely remote.

                          Most LLs sensibly take the view that even though they are not legally obliged to mitigate their losses in these circumstances, it is better to re-let the property as soon as possible and that the cost in time, energy and money of pursuing an insolvent tenant through the courts is probably not worth it.

                          Some LLs will of course argue that 'on principle', Ts should be held liable for their debts even if this means the LL 'running barefoot over the frozen ridges of the Alps'. This 'terrier with rat' approach may work for some, but I fear I would lack the stomach for it.

                          What do others think?
                          'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

                          Comment

                          Latest Activity

                          Collapse

                          • Attending Court - Advice Please
                            Muzza
                            Hi there

                            I posted recently about our tenant leaving and giving her ex the keys to our house, we have a court date of 4th January for which Im flying back to the UK to attend (no contact or rent received from the persons she has left in there still). I feel hes staying in there as long...
                            12-12-2017, 18:03 PM
                          • Reply to Attending Court - Advice Please
                            theartfullodger
                            Well done: Hope someone got LOTS of evidence (eg photos) of tenant's departure, all belongings gone. You had questionable legal right to change locks: Until bailiffs "execute" the possession order there is still a tenancy, it's still the tenant's home, the tenant's property. Hopefully enough...
                            22-01-2018, 19:44 PM
                          • Section 21 query
                            manchester89
                            Hi.

                            I was looking for some advice in regards to a Section 21 served.

                            A 6-month tenancy was originally granted in September 2015. Upon expiry a new 1-year fixed term tenancy was signed. Is this a new tenancy or a replacement?

                            In September the EPC and GSC was given...
                            22-01-2018, 12:51 PM
                          • Reply to Section 21 query
                            manchester89
                            I just wanted to make sure my landlord had done things right cause there are lots of things on the internet so its confusing but thank you i have as i don't want to be going through the eviction process with a small child id rather be out as soon as possible....
                            22-01-2018, 19:36 PM
                          • Invalid section 21 and limiting LL access
                            poppyla
                            Hi everyone,

                            I was wondering if you can help me with my issues with my LL. Apologies for the long post, but I’m going through a very stressful time.

                            My landlord tried to increase my rent “illegally” in Sept/Oct and wanted me to sign a backdated agreement and requested...
                            22-01-2018, 15:27 PM
                          • Reply to Invalid section 21 and limiting LL access
                            theartfullodger
                            All very well but realistically you can simply refuse access, change locks, say it's not convenient then. Yes they may have a contractual right but to enforce it they'd need a court order, which would take about as long as evicting you.

                            And which potential purchaser is going to await a...
                            22-01-2018, 18:36 PM
                          • Possession claim 'struck out' what can i do next
                            lislog
                            I filed a section 8 notice (correctly i believe) then a possession claim on line. The court hearing was 6th Dec - in stupidity or naivety having had no experience with the law before, i did not realise i had to attend the court hearing for a straightforward case of rental arrears (tenant owes £3000...
                            10-01-2018, 09:22 AM
                          • Reply to Possession claim 'struck out' what can i do next
                            Muzza
                            Id try and get it reinstated, if she didnt show the first time or make arrangments to pay its unlikely she will the second time, I recently had to fly back from the US to attend court on a section 8 and was in and out in 15 minutes - good luck to you.
                            22-01-2018, 18:22 PM
                          • Reply to Invalid section 21 and limiting LL access
                            poppyla
                            Yeah, i read all 33 pages of the thread... it is difficult though to understand exactly where i stand when it's so personal, rather than theoretical question!

                            They already pointed out which clauses say they can come in. There's one that says the landlord, his agent and any person authorised...
                            22-01-2018, 18:09 PM
                          • Reply to Attending Court - Advice Please
                            Muzza
                            UPDATE

                            Ok I flew home to attend court on 4th January, I was in and out in 15 minutes, possession was granted on rent arrears alone and anyone living in the house was given 14 days to leave, the tenant was also ordered to pay all arrears and court fee.

                            This meant they had to...
                            22-01-2018, 18:05 PM
                          Working...
                          X