Deposit protection for new tenancy

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Deposit protection for new tenancy

    A&B take out an AST and pay a deposit, which is protected.
    A&B separate, and A signs a new AST for same property. Original deposit is not returned, but carries on for new tenancy.

    A is served with s21.

    Is the deposit protected?

    Or is it simply that the deposit for A&B was never refunded so there is no deposit for A?

  • #2
    Originally posted by Snorkerz View Post
    A&B take out an AST and pay a deposit, which is protected.
    A&B separate, and A signs a new AST for same property. Original deposit is not returned, but carries on for new tenancy.
    It can't 'carry on'. The deposit relates only to the tenancy it is registered against, i.e. A&B's tenancy, not A's brand new tenancy.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by westminster View Post
      It can't 'carry on'. The deposit relates only to the tenancy it is registered against, i.e. A&B's tenancy, not A's brand new tenancy.
      I accept that it can't happen like that - but that's what the landlord did - so I guess I'm asking about the implications now with regard to the s21. It was both the landlords and the tenants intention that the money originally paid for A&Bs deposit be re-used for As new tenancy deposit.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Snorkerz View Post
        A is served with s21.

        Is the deposit protected?
        If no deposit was taken for A's new tenancy, then deposit protection is not required (so will not make s.21 invalid).

        Originally posted by Snorkerz View Post
        It was both the landlords and the tenants intention that the money originally paid for A&Bs deposit be re-used for As new tenancy deposit.
        Not sure of the legal implications of this, or whether it's even possible, i.e. transferring a deposit from one tenancy to the next.

        Is there written proof of the LL's and T's "intentions", e.g. in the AST, or a receipt?
        The information in my posts is provided 'as is'. This is not intended to be legal advice. Legal or other professional advice should be sought before acting or relying on this information or any part of it. I will not be held responsible for loss or damage arising from errors in the information or the way in which a person uses the information on this . For more information on your query use the '' link at the top of this page. Agreements, Forms & Notices can be found .

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Snorkerz View Post
          I accept that it can't happen like that - but that's what the landlord did - so I guess I'm asking about the implications now with regard to the s21. It was both the landlords and the tenants intention that the money originally paid for A&Bs deposit be re-used for As new tenancy deposit.
          It may have been their intention, but down at the deposit scheme there will be a record saying £x protected for A&B's tenancy commencing [date]. There will be nothing saying £x protected for A's tenancy commencing [later date].

          Even if A&B had together signed a new fixed term agreement, the deposit would have had to be re-protected for that new tenancy.

          The s.21 served on A is valid because no deposit was paid.

          Comment


          • #6
            What if L has indicated in writing that she will deduct rent arrears from the deposit? Does that indicate that a deposit exists for As tenancy, even though it is protected under A&Bs defunct tenancy?

            Comment


            • #7
              I think a little more detail might be required.

              For example, if the deposit paid on the A & B tenancy is now held by the landlord. And if (assuming this sum was jointly owned by A & B) both A & B have agreed for it to be used as the deposit on A's new tenancy. And on the basis that the landlord and A agreed that a deposit was payable on the new tenancy. Then on these facts I think it could well be held that a deposit has been paid and should have been protected.

              Incidentally, just as side issue, how was the old tenancy (the one held by A & B) ended?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Preston View Post
                Incidentally, just as side issue, how was the old tenancy (the one held by A & B) ended?
                AST became periodic and later LL decided (unilaterally) that B was going and A could remain (+ kids)with new AST. Tenancy agreement for A shows 'deposit already held'

                Have already asked the questions re legality of B being removed (probably not)

                Comment

                Latest Activity

                Collapse

                • Extremely anti-social and criminal tenant -Section 8
                  BouwensPB
                  I have an extremely anti-social and criminal tenant. My neighbours think she is possibly a sex worker and drugs abusing and dealing. She has made a witnessed and CCTV sited assault on one neighbour and has verbally abused others. 3 crimes have been reported and the local authority talk about making...
                  26-07-2017, 16:09 PM
                • Reply to Extremely anti-social and criminal tenant -Section 8
                  Galatea
                  I have experienced far more dificult cases than that from my neighbour's tenants with my front window and my flat door window cracked.

                  Make an offer she cannot refuse. Carrots work better.

                  Local Authorities are slow moving because shortage of housing is a problem.
                  27-07-2017, 22:25 PM
                • Burglary Damage - Who Pays?
                  Pb21
                  Our rented flat was broken into, in the process the Yale lock was broken and cost £100 to repair. The landlord is refusing to pay this on the basis we didn’t also lock the door with the mortice lock. We didn’t use the mortice lock as it wasn’t working although the landlord did not know this....
                  25-07-2017, 11:40 AM
                • Reply to Burglary Damage - Who Pays?
                  Galatea
                  Since the Yale was broken it proves the tenants took responsible measures for the security: they locked the door.
                  The yale is necessary for security. It is sufficient and safe to use in case of a fire because you could get out quickly operating the lock with the thump ie you don't want to be looking...
                  27-07-2017, 22:13 PM
                • One tenant moving out and two remaining - who pays for the checkout/inventory?
                  IoIo
                  Q1 – Where is the rented property located (England / Wales / Scotland / N Ireland)? England

                  Q2 – What type of Tenancy Agreement (TA) is this e.g. sole tenant / multiple tenant / room only? Three people all listed as the Tenant under the agreement

                  Q3 – What date did current...
                  26-07-2017, 16:38 PM
                • Reply to One tenant moving out and two remaining - who pays for the checkout/inventory?
                  IoIo
                  Thank you all for your comments. Very useful, informative and much appreciated.

                  The tenants are "moving out" on the last day of the current tenancy i.e. at the end of the term. My understanding is that if they're all listed as the "Tenant" then if one gives notice it's...
                  27-07-2017, 21:23 PM
                • This is a NO isn't it? Seems iffy to me, what do you think?
                  Berlingogirl
                  This is a NO isn't it? Seems iffy to me, what do you think? Any insights? My ad is on Gumtree.



                  "Hello, I'm A***** a British America Business man, I have a business project in your area and I'll like to rent your apartment for the period of 6 month and I'll like to know...
                  27-07-2017, 13:57 PM
                • Reply to This is a NO isn't it? Seems iffy to me, what do you think?
                  Berlingogirl
                  I'm trying to , jta, but I think he knows I know....
                  27-07-2017, 20:16 PM
                • Reply to Extremely anti-social and criminal tenant -Section 8
                  Wright76
                  You are also aware you are now liable to pay her a penalty of up three times the deposit value?.

                  My experience of a drug addict is that they will leave with a financial offering.

                  Strike a deal taking into account your likely penalty and eviction costs and offer her an amount...
                  27-07-2017, 19:10 PM
                • Reply to Extremely anti-social and criminal tenant -Section 8
                  theartfullodger
                  Check insurance for what you must do knowing what you do....
                  27-07-2017, 19:00 PM
                Working...
                X