Deposit protection obligation: LPA Receiver or original landlord?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by silvercar View Post
    If the landlord is insolvent, would that make the tenant a creditor?
    Yes, but only an unsecured creditor.
    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by westminster View Post
      Very good point; even if LL wanted to protect the deposit, he's prevented from doing so. What a brilliant system! (not)
      Agreed about the "not". However, he could potentially use the DPS - if tenant is still in occupation, provided the DPS don't prevent him from doing so because he'd been barred by Mydeposits or was insolvent. I suppose if he couldn't reprotect elsewhere, he'd have to return it.- but if he is insolvent, he cant.

      Hmmnn what a brilliant system indeed.... (not)
      Last edited by havensRus; 10-11-2009, 19:30 PM. Reason: add info

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by SE1 Tenant View Post
        The LL / agency situation is very different from the LL / LPA Receiver in my view, on the ground that ultimate benefactor of the cash flow generated by the flat/proterty (i.e. the rent) is now the LPA Receiver. This is not the case in a LL / agency situation.

        !!
        That is not the case the reciever has to apportion the income in a specific way set out in law, essentially first he has to pay the interest on the loan to the lender, then some other obligations followed by his own costs/fees(which are also set out in law) and if there is still a surplus the remainder back to the mortgagor/LL

        My take on the deposit would be that as the LL cannot protect the deposit he cannot take/hold one so must return it to the tenant, after all the deposit ultimately belongs to the tenant

        Comment


          #34
          So, of the LPA Receiver has appointed an Managing Agent (which belongs to the same company as the LPA Receiver) is my counterparty when/if I file a county court claim for depsoit not being protected:

          1) LPA Receiver;

          2) Managing agent appointed by LPA Receiver;

          3) Original Landlord (who holds deposit);

          or

          4) Any/all of the above?

          I have read and read and read but I can still not quite figure this out.

          Any info or advice that could shed light of this would be valuable and appreciated. Or if there is a solicitor/legal professional on here that would like talk in/advice private about that I am open for that also as I'm in a catch-22 situation if I can't figure this out as I have a very clear cut case but I don't know who to file the County Court claim against. I've tried a few solicitors but they have not been able to give me a straight answer either.

          Comment


            #35
            Another, eh, interesting twist to this is that as my deposit is not protected the LL or LPA-R can not notice me to leave as long as I pay my rent, right?

            In that case the LPA-R can't sell the flat which ultimtely he/she is mandated to do to recover the mortgage for the mortgage lender/bank.

            So, shouldn't really the LPA-R be responsible for the deposit, after all, as without being in control of, and if it gets unprotected, he/she can not fullfill his/her obligations.

            Comment


              #36
              Another thing, again, if now the LPA-R is really acting as an 'agent' to the LL they could still be held liable for the deposit (protecting and returning it) and accordingly I could direct my claim for protecting/returning the depsit and the 3 times deposit on the basis that they are just an 'agent' of the LL.

              All according to 212 (9) (a):

              (9) In this Chapter—

              (a) references to a landlord or landlords in relation to any shorthold tenancy or tenancies include references to a person or persons acting on his or their behalf in relation to the tenancy or tenancies, and

              http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2004...pt6-ch4-l1g212

              Comment


                #37
                More discussion and some additional interesting and relevant conclusions and information on this topic on this blog:

                http://landlordlaw.blogspot.com/2009...blem-what.html

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by SE1 Tenant View Post
                  Another, eh, interesting twist to this is that as my deposit is not protected the LL or LPA-R can not notice me to leave as long as I pay my rent, right?

                  In that case the LPA-R can't sell the flat which ultimtely he/she is mandated to do to recover the mortgage for the mortgage lender/bank.
                  They couldn't use a s.21 notice seeking possession, but they could use Ground 2.

                  See http://www.bilberrybloom.com/citizen...1/11050612.htm

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by SE1 Tenant View Post
                    Another thing, again, if now the LPA-R is really acting as an 'agent' to the LL they could still be held liable for the deposit (protecting and returning it) and accordingly I could direct my claim for protecting/returning the depsit and the 3 times deposit on the basis that they are just an 'agent' of the LL.

                    All according to 212 (9) (a):

                    (9) In this Chapter—

                    (a) references to a landlord or landlords in relation to any shorthold tenancy or tenancies include references to a person or persons acting on his or their behalf in relation to the tenancy or tenancies, and

                    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2004...pt6-ch4-l1g212
                    Yes, you can also claim against the LL's agent.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      in similar situation

                      What happened at the end in your case? I am in a similar escenario and i am doing a bit of research on the matter.

                      Did you pursue the receivers for the 3x deposit claim? what has happened since?

                      Any light you could shed on this will be greatly appreciated.

                      Comment

                      Latest Activity

                      Collapse

                      • Reply to Buying a tenanted residential property
                        by theartfullodger
                        In November 1979 BoE base rate hit 17% under Thatcher's government. My building society was kind by only raising their rates to 15%.....

                        IMHO rates will continue to rise. Sorry.

                        What you are proposing would breach your mortgage terms and possibly result in place being repo'd....
                        16-05-2022, 14:30 PM
                      • Buying a tenanted residential property
                        by itsthomas
                        We are buying a residential property to live in
                        Now that everything is ready for exchange we are told that the tenant has decided not to move out.
                        The tenancy agreement is already expired two months ago and she has stopped paying rent since.

                        Now we would like to know what happens...
                        12-05-2022, 19:37 PM
                      • Reply to Invoice for work - am I being unreasonable?
                        by Neelix
                        Just be thankful you haven’t got an insurance claim from the flat below...
                        16-05-2022, 14:28 PM
                      • Invoice for work - am I being unreasonable?
                        by Laurasplog
                        We have a London flat managed by an agent (full management service).

                        My husband and I were abroad, and got a call from the council saying the property was leaking sewage into the flat below. We contacted our agent immediately who sent someone around the same day (Company A).

                        ...
                        16-05-2022, 12:58 PM
                      • Reply to Invoice for work - am I being unreasonable?
                        by ash72
                        Why didn't Company A just carry out the works, why were 2 other companies enlisted, was this for insurance purposes? Most likely company A made the right assessment, as it could be a combination of both bath being sealed and pipes especially if hair and other things start causing a blockage something...
                        16-05-2022, 14:25 PM
                      • Reply to S21 Abolition Query
                        by theartfullodger
                        Until we see the actual legislation to be enacted to replace s21 we won't know.

                        We could talk about how Scotland handled abolition of the equivalent, but am confident England will do it differently (mainly due to NIH )

                        Who wanted 24 months and why or watch why? Do I guess...
                        16-05-2022, 14:24 PM
                      • S21 Abolition Query
                        by Sol_1969
                        Hi,

                        Now that it looks like that S21 will be abolished, can anyone hazard a guess what will happen to S21 notices that were issued before the abolition but have not yet been completed?

                        I have tenants who are 12 months through a 24-month contract. I would like to serve a S21...
                        16-05-2022, 10:32 AM
                      • Reply to Invoice for work - am I being unreasonable?
                        by AndrewDod
                        How exactly do you think "agents" make money. Sounds as if you need to be a lot more hands-on and get involved in every decision. Obviously you are being fleeced....
                        16-05-2022, 13:41 PM
                      • Reply to Invoice for work - am I being unreasonable?
                        by tlangdon12
                        You can complain about how each company handed the issue, but you may not get much off the bills. It's not clear from your post who engaged these companies. If the letting agent engaged them all, I would complain to the agent, but if you engaged them, then your complaints are with the companies you...
                        16-05-2022, 13:34 PM
                      • Reply to New Joint Landlord
                        by jpkeates
                        The purpose of the change is for the overall amount of tax to be paid to be reduced.
                        That's best done transparently and simply.


                        There doesn't seem to be any downside to the spouse being joint landlord, other than the need to send a notice.

                        Not being a joint landlord,...
                        16-05-2022, 12:05 PM
                      Working...
                      X