Deposit protection obligation: LPA Receiver or original landlord?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by silvercar View Post
    If the landlord is insolvent, would that make the tenant a creditor?
    Yes, but only an unsecured creditor.
    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by westminster View Post
      Very good point; even if LL wanted to protect the deposit, he's prevented from doing so. What a brilliant system! (not)
      Agreed about the "not". However, he could potentially use the DPS - if tenant is still in occupation, provided the DPS don't prevent him from doing so because he'd been barred by Mydeposits or was insolvent. I suppose if he couldn't reprotect elsewhere, he'd have to return it.- but if he is insolvent, he cant.

      Hmmnn what a brilliant system indeed.... (not)
      Last edited by havensRus; 10-11-2009, 18:30 PM. Reason: add info

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by SE1 Tenant View Post
        The LL / agency situation is very different from the LL / LPA Receiver in my view, on the ground that ultimate benefactor of the cash flow generated by the flat/proterty (i.e. the rent) is now the LPA Receiver. This is not the case in a LL / agency situation.

        !!
        That is not the case the reciever has to apportion the income in a specific way set out in law, essentially first he has to pay the interest on the loan to the lender, then some other obligations followed by his own costs/fees(which are also set out in law) and if there is still a surplus the remainder back to the mortgagor/LL

        My take on the deposit would be that as the LL cannot protect the deposit he cannot take/hold one so must return it to the tenant, after all the deposit ultimately belongs to the tenant

        Comment


        • #34
          So, of the LPA Receiver has appointed an Managing Agent (which belongs to the same company as the LPA Receiver) is my counterparty when/if I file a county court claim for depsoit not being protected:

          1) LPA Receiver;

          2) Managing agent appointed by LPA Receiver;

          3) Original Landlord (who holds deposit);

          or

          4) Any/all of the above?

          I have read and read and read but I can still not quite figure this out.

          Any info or advice that could shed light of this would be valuable and appreciated. Or if there is a solicitor/legal professional on here that would like talk in/advice private about that I am open for that also as I'm in a catch-22 situation if I can't figure this out as I have a very clear cut case but I don't know who to file the County Court claim against. I've tried a few solicitors but they have not been able to give me a straight answer either.

          Comment


          • #35
            Another, eh, interesting twist to this is that as my deposit is not protected the LL or LPA-R can not notice me to leave as long as I pay my rent, right?

            In that case the LPA-R can't sell the flat which ultimtely he/she is mandated to do to recover the mortgage for the mortgage lender/bank.

            So, shouldn't really the LPA-R be responsible for the deposit, after all, as without being in control of, and if it gets unprotected, he/she can not fullfill his/her obligations.

            Comment


            • #36
              Another thing, again, if now the LPA-R is really acting as an 'agent' to the LL they could still be held liable for the deposit (protecting and returning it) and accordingly I could direct my claim for protecting/returning the depsit and the 3 times deposit on the basis that they are just an 'agent' of the LL.

              All according to 212 (9) (a):

              (9) In this Chapter—

              (a) references to a landlord or landlords in relation to any shorthold tenancy or tenancies include references to a person or persons acting on his or their behalf in relation to the tenancy or tenancies, and

              http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2004...pt6-ch4-l1g212

              Comment


              • #37
                More discussion and some additional interesting and relevant conclusions and information on this topic on this blog:

                http://landlordlaw.blogspot.com/2009...blem-what.html

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by SE1 Tenant View Post
                  Another, eh, interesting twist to this is that as my deposit is not protected the LL or LPA-R can not notice me to leave as long as I pay my rent, right?

                  In that case the LPA-R can't sell the flat which ultimtely he/she is mandated to do to recover the mortgage for the mortgage lender/bank.
                  They couldn't use a s.21 notice seeking possession, but they could use Ground 2.

                  See http://www.bilberrybloom.com/citizen...1/11050612.htm

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by SE1 Tenant View Post
                    Another thing, again, if now the LPA-R is really acting as an 'agent' to the LL they could still be held liable for the deposit (protecting and returning it) and accordingly I could direct my claim for protecting/returning the depsit and the 3 times deposit on the basis that they are just an 'agent' of the LL.

                    All according to 212 (9) (a):

                    (9) In this Chapter—

                    (a) references to a landlord or landlords in relation to any shorthold tenancy or tenancies include references to a person or persons acting on his or their behalf in relation to the tenancy or tenancies, and

                    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2004...pt6-ch4-l1g212
                    Yes, you can also claim against the LL's agent.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      in similar situation

                      What happened at the end in your case? I am in a similar escenario and i am doing a bit of research on the matter.

                      Did you pursue the receivers for the 3x deposit claim? what has happened since?

                      Any light you could shed on this will be greatly appreciated.

                      Comment

                      Latest Activity

                      Collapse

                      • Landlord asks that T to pay deposit protection charge each time we renew AST
                        JP23
                        Why must we continuously renew our deposit with the scheme each time we re-sign our AST i.e. every 12 months?

                        Why can the deposit not remain protected throughout the duration of the overall tenant occupation?

                        Is our landlord acting in questionable faith by asking us to pay...
                        23-07-2017, 04:18 AM
                      • Claiming for protected deposit
                        mandm
                        This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
                        Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
                        I served the...
                        21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
                      • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                        mariner
                        Not protecting deposit correctly can deprive T of access to DPS & ADR.
                        Providing T with DPS Cert. only is not LL providing full PI
                        Many LLs cannot even serve a valid s21!

                        By all means let Ts police the scheme but limit their return to return of full deposit with 1-3x Penalty...
                        23-07-2017, 03:16 AM
                      • Referencing question
                        kangoo1
                        A couple wants to rent from me, she is on maternity leave and will not be returning to her previous employment, he is permanently employed and moving due to a job transfer. I have referenced him for the full rent and his guarantor has been successfully referenced.
                        I am going to prepare the ast...
                        22-07-2017, 17:19 PM
                      • Reply to Referencing question
                        mariner
                        Ref both for the full rent. Is the G a house/property owner?
                        23-07-2017, 02:38 AM
                      • Mouldy silicone wear and tear?
                        aciduzzo
                        Tenants are moving out today and i am doing the final inspection later; however, last time i was at the flat i noticed the bathroom was in a poor state.

                        What is the general opinion on black mould that has formed inside bathroom silicone? Is it considered wear and tear? Also, the seal...
                        03-07-2017, 08:07 AM
                      • Reply to Mouldy silicone wear and tear?
                        mystic08
                        You might like to gift your new tenants some Kilrock mould cleaner which is magic in a bottle! Cheapest in the Pound shop or The Range but supermarkets sell it too. Works brilliantly on algae too. Garden pots, patios, headstones etc.
                        22-07-2017, 20:52 PM
                      • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                        MrShed
                        I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

                        I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
                        20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
                      • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                        jjlandlord
                        That's the exemption that allows sending data outside of the EEA, which is the issue discussed.



                        No, because of that very exemption....
                        22-07-2017, 19:19 PM
                      • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                        JK0
                        I'll leave it at that. I'm not going to get into one of JPK's interminable arguments.
                        22-07-2017, 16:28 PM
                      Working...
                      X