Deposit protection obligation: LPA Receiver or original landlord?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by silvercar View Post
    If the landlord is insolvent, would that make the tenant a creditor?
    Yes, but only an unsecured creditor.
    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by westminster View Post
      Very good point; even if LL wanted to protect the deposit, he's prevented from doing so. What a brilliant system! (not)
      Agreed about the "not". However, he could potentially use the DPS - if tenant is still in occupation, provided the DPS don't prevent him from doing so because he'd been barred by Mydeposits or was insolvent. I suppose if he couldn't reprotect elsewhere, he'd have to return it.- but if he is insolvent, he cant.

      Hmmnn what a brilliant system indeed.... (not)
      Last edited by havensRus; 10-11-2009, 18:30 PM. Reason: add info

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by SE1 Tenant View Post
        The LL / agency situation is very different from the LL / LPA Receiver in my view, on the ground that ultimate benefactor of the cash flow generated by the flat/proterty (i.e. the rent) is now the LPA Receiver. This is not the case in a LL / agency situation.

        !!
        That is not the case the reciever has to apportion the income in a specific way set out in law, essentially first he has to pay the interest on the loan to the lender, then some other obligations followed by his own costs/fees(which are also set out in law) and if there is still a surplus the remainder back to the mortgagor/LL

        My take on the deposit would be that as the LL cannot protect the deposit he cannot take/hold one so must return it to the tenant, after all the deposit ultimately belongs to the tenant

        Comment


          #34
          So, of the LPA Receiver has appointed an Managing Agent (which belongs to the same company as the LPA Receiver) is my counterparty when/if I file a county court claim for depsoit not being protected:

          1) LPA Receiver;

          2) Managing agent appointed by LPA Receiver;

          3) Original Landlord (who holds deposit);

          or

          4) Any/all of the above?

          I have read and read and read but I can still not quite figure this out.

          Any info or advice that could shed light of this would be valuable and appreciated. Or if there is a solicitor/legal professional on here that would like talk in/advice private about that I am open for that also as I'm in a catch-22 situation if I can't figure this out as I have a very clear cut case but I don't know who to file the County Court claim against. I've tried a few solicitors but they have not been able to give me a straight answer either.

          Comment


            #35
            Another, eh, interesting twist to this is that as my deposit is not protected the LL or LPA-R can not notice me to leave as long as I pay my rent, right?

            In that case the LPA-R can't sell the flat which ultimtely he/she is mandated to do to recover the mortgage for the mortgage lender/bank.

            So, shouldn't really the LPA-R be responsible for the deposit, after all, as without being in control of, and if it gets unprotected, he/she can not fullfill his/her obligations.

            Comment


              #36
              Another thing, again, if now the LPA-R is really acting as an 'agent' to the LL they could still be held liable for the deposit (protecting and returning it) and accordingly I could direct my claim for protecting/returning the depsit and the 3 times deposit on the basis that they are just an 'agent' of the LL.

              All according to 212 (9) (a):

              (9) In this Chapter—

              (a) references to a landlord or landlords in relation to any shorthold tenancy or tenancies include references to a person or persons acting on his or their behalf in relation to the tenancy or tenancies, and

              http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2004...pt6-ch4-l1g212

              Comment


                #37
                More discussion and some additional interesting and relevant conclusions and information on this topic on this blog:

                http://landlordlaw.blogspot.com/2009...blem-what.html

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by SE1 Tenant View Post
                  Another, eh, interesting twist to this is that as my deposit is not protected the LL or LPA-R can not notice me to leave as long as I pay my rent, right?

                  In that case the LPA-R can't sell the flat which ultimtely he/she is mandated to do to recover the mortgage for the mortgage lender/bank.
                  They couldn't use a s.21 notice seeking possession, but they could use Ground 2.

                  See http://www.bilberrybloom.com/citizen...1/11050612.htm

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by SE1 Tenant View Post
                    Another thing, again, if now the LPA-R is really acting as an 'agent' to the LL they could still be held liable for the deposit (protecting and returning it) and accordingly I could direct my claim for protecting/returning the depsit and the 3 times deposit on the basis that they are just an 'agent' of the LL.

                    All according to 212 (9) (a):

                    (9) In this Chapter—

                    (a) references to a landlord or landlords in relation to any shorthold tenancy or tenancies include references to a person or persons acting on his or their behalf in relation to the tenancy or tenancies, and

                    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2004...pt6-ch4-l1g212
                    Yes, you can also claim against the LL's agent.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      in similar situation

                      What happened at the end in your case? I am in a similar escenario and i am doing a bit of research on the matter.

                      Did you pursue the receivers for the 3x deposit claim? what has happened since?

                      Any light you could shed on this will be greatly appreciated.

                      Comment

                      Latest Activity

                      Collapse

                      • Landlord's possessions in property
                        jmp1991
                        Hello,

                        Looking for some advice. We rent a property from a landlord which is managed by an agent.
                        Once we moved in, we discovered several very large boxes of the landlord's possessions stored in the only cupboard.
                        Due to this, we have ironing boards, hoovers, etc floating around...
                        20-05-2019, 19:03 PM
                      • Reply to Landlord's possessions in property
                        AndrewDod
                        Yes but that presumes the nature of the tenancy. The OP described it as multi-tenant, and hasn't reverted to us to clarify.

                        Second the OP initially referred to "boxes of the landlords stuff", but then later to "ironing boards, hoovers etc". There is no law that says...
                        27-05-2019, 09:41 AM
                      • New Tenancy Issues
                        AXY
                        Good Evening All,

                        I found this forum by a happy accident and would like advice on a tenancy issues on which I am not an well versed in.

                        I have recently moved into a property which has a few issues that are making my stay as a tenant quite uncomfortable. The landlord was being...
                        25-05-2019, 18:22 PM
                      • Reply to New Tenancy Issues
                        jpkeates
                        Please keep to the same sets of references.

                        If the Landlord is overseas and you are sending rent money to them and they are UK taxpayers, they have to either show you that HMRC have agreed to the rent being sent in full, or you need to deduct tax at base rate before sending it, and complete...
                        27-05-2019, 08:56 AM
                      • Deposit - Tenant Fees Act 2019
                        Pergola
                        I'm a landlord and would appreciate if you could advise whether I will be in compliance with the Tenant Fees Act 2019.

                        I signed a tenancy agreement before 1st June for a tenancy beginning after that date and requested a deposit equal to 6 weeks of rent.

                        Based on 30(1)(b),...
                        14-04-2019, 08:55 AM
                      • Reply to Deposit - Tenant Fees Act 2019
                        Lawcruncher
                        A periodic tenancy is a single tenancy....
                        27-05-2019, 08:08 AM
                      • Reply to Deposit - Tenant Fees Act 2019
                        KTC
                        A periodic tenancy from before 1 June 2019 falls under s30(1).

                        A fixed tenancy from before 1 June 2019 that becomes periodic between 1 June 2019 and 1 June 2020 contractually is a continuation of a single tenancy and also falls under s30(1).

                        A fixed tenancy from before 1 June...
                        27-05-2019, 03:56 AM
                      • Universal Credit - Rent Arrears - Tenant not paying - Section 8
                        funkar
                        Hello everyone.

                        It's about my tenant who was destined to give me trouble.

                        So, as soon as universal credit started, Rent payments switched to UC from the local council.

                        My tenant is ever since mostly drunk and enjoying the money which he was supposed to pay me as...
                        24-05-2019, 22:02 PM
                      • Reply to Universal Credit - Rent Arrears - Tenant not paying - Section 8
                        mariner
                        Hopeless maybe, but T will still have a CCJ for debt, which should reduce access to further credit. Tcan blame UC for CCJ.
                        26-05-2019, 23:17 PM
                      • Reply to New Tenancy Issues
                        AXY
                        Okay to clarify- I secured the flat through a lettings agency and I had even met F before agreeing to the let.
                        Both the agency and myself always referred to the landlord by their last name even to this day and I never communicated with the landlord directly via email or phone before moving in....
                        26-05-2019, 23:03 PM
                      Working...
                      X