deposit dispute

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    deposit dispute

    Can someone please help me. A prospective tenant signed a ash tenancy agreement (privately) on the 24/8/09 on the 31/8/09 she advised me she wasn't moving in she had paid me £950 rent and deposit she advised me to keep the rent but wanted the deposit back ( it wasn't protected I hadn't got round to it with moving and had another 7 days to do so). I advised her it would all depend how quickly I got a new tenant. Therefore I put the house in the hands of a letting agent, a new tenant moved in on the 9/10/09 but I have obviously incurred the the fee from the letting agent and also had to purchase new curtain poles etc as she asked them to be left for her, she is still wanting her deposit back. Can someone please advise where I stand thanks.........

    #2
    Originally posted by crud67 View Post
    A prospective tenant signed a ash tenancy agreement
    Do you mean Assured Shorthold Tenancy agreement?

    If so, the deposit should have been protected* and tenant given deposit scheme info. within 14 days of LL receiving the deposit.

    Return the deposit to the tenant and keep proof of this, in case there is any dispute.

    Also, any rent that you have taken, that is not used as rent, may be seen (by a court) as a deposit.

    * Assumes AST in E&W and annual rent < £25k.
    The information in my posts is provided 'as is'. This is not intended to be legal advice. Legal or other professional advice should be sought before acting or relying on this information or any part of it. I will not be held responsible for loss or damage arising from errors in the information or the way in which a person uses the information on this . For more information on your query use the '' link at the top of this page. Agreements, Forms & Notices can be found .

    Comment


      #3
      Thanks for the quick response. Yeah I meant assured shorthold tenancy. So even though she didn't move in the deposit should still have been protected? If so why should receive all of it back? as it would run from 24th to 24th and they didn't move in until the 9th?????

      thanks

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by crud67 View Post
        So even though she didn't move in the deposit should still have been protected?
        T does not have to be resident for a tenancy to have been created.

        Originally posted by crud67 View Post
        If so why should receive all of it back?
        Because it's the T's. LL has to prove deductions are required.

        Please learn the basics of landlording. Join a landlord's association; they have good courses. If you can't find the time to do this, maybe landlording is not for you - if not for yourself then at least for the sake of your tenant's.
        The information in my posts is provided 'as is'. This is not intended to be legal advice. Legal or other professional advice should be sought before acting or relying on this information or any part of it. I will not be held responsible for loss or damage arising from errors in the information or the way in which a person uses the information on this . For more information on your query use the '' link at the top of this page. Agreements, Forms & Notices can be found .

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by tom999 View Post
          T does not have to be resident for a tenancy to have been created.
          But it's not an AST unless T uses premises as only/main home; and, if it's not an AST, Deposit Protection does not apply.
          JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
          1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
          2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
          3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
          4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

          Comment


            #6
            Agreed, as T has not moved in.

            But deposit still needs to be returned.
            The information in my posts is provided 'as is'. This is not intended to be legal advice. Legal or other professional advice should be sought before acting or relying on this information or any part of it. I will not be held responsible for loss or damage arising from errors in the information or the way in which a person uses the information on this . For more information on your query use the '' link at the top of this page. Agreements, Forms & Notices can be found .

            Comment


              #7
              Isn't that a bit or a contradiction??

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
                But it's not an AST unless T uses premises as only/main home; and, if it's not an AST, Deposit Protection does not apply.
                Could it be argued that the deposit was intended to be held/taken in connection with an AST? (Just playing devil's advocate).

                S.212 (8) HA 2004
                “tenancy deposit”, in relation to a shorthold tenancy, means any money intended to be held (by the landlord or otherwise) as security for—
                (a)the performance of any obligations of the tenant, or
                (b)the discharge of any liability of his,
                arising under or in connection with the tenancy.

                Comment


                  #9
                  in relation to a shorthold tenancy: what could this mean if no tenancy ever exists?
                  JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                  1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                  2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                  3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                  4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
                    in relation to a shorthold tenancy: what could this mean if no tenancy ever exists?
                    Well, the deposit was intended to held in connection with the AST as per HA definition. Don't get me wrong, I'm of the same opinion as you - no AST/no protection - but this debate has come up in past threads and there's someone (can't remember who) who always argues this point. There was one where the would-be T had paid the deposit and the TA hadn't even been signed when the T pulled out. A lot of deposits are handed over before the TA is signed and the HA does say the money must be protected within 14 days of this event - of course, there's nothing in the legislation about what happens if T doesn't go on to sign TA or signs but doesn't move in...

                    I've never seen any reported cases where a s.214 claim has been made in these circumstances and I doubt any such claim would succeed.

                    Comment

                    Latest Activity

                    Collapse

                    • Reply to Ending Joint Tenancy & Agency Fees
                      by Darkside
                      Just thought I'd update this and summarise. Thanks for all replies so far and apologies if what I am saying is confusing (some of it doesn't really make sense to me either).
                      Our previous FTA ended on 19-09-2020 between myself and two others (joint tenancy). On the 20-09-2020, one of the others...
                      01-10-2020, 08:06 AM
                    • Ending Joint Tenancy & Agency Fees
                      by Darkside
                      Hi everyone,

                      I've already found a great deal of useful information on this forum so many thanks to all these knowledgable posters!

                      I entered into a joint fixed term tenancy agreement with two others. The fixed term runs for 12 months and the wording in case it helps is 'The...
                      06-09-2020, 08:05 AM
                    • Reply to Boiler repair - tenant checked into hotel
                      by tatemono
                      I think you've done all you can in the situation including what many would not in offering your own facilities. I think, given the T's circumstances she would have been in her right to argue for some reduction in rent due to the inconvenience of not having all that she paid for. Perhaps you could negotiate...
                      01-10-2020, 07:51 AM
                    • Boiler repair - tenant checked into hotel
                      by tedcbe
                      Hi I have a tenant who has checked into a hotel due to the fact that the boiler broke down and says she will reduce the amount in the next month’s rent.
                      I have never agreed for her to check into a hotel in the first place.
                      She reported there is an issue with the heating on Sunday night...
                      30-09-2020, 22:30 PM
                    • Reply to Tenant moves his girlfriend in
                      by tatemono
                      That's the only thing we've ever done when partners move in... based on advice on these forums I should add!...
                      01-10-2020, 07:46 AM
                    • Tenant moves his girlfriend in
                      by Hollywood
                      Hi all, I've searched for similar thread but didn't succeed.
                      My Tenant of 14 months, now on a SPT, has moved his girlfriend in. I'm ok with arrangement, it was mentioned by him when he first moved in but they split and nothing happened until now. He has been a good tenant so far & kindly...
                      30-09-2020, 14:12 PM
                    • Reply to Deposit Protection Rules?
                      by jase222
                      There was a case in Bristol similar where the judge rule that the landlord was right to give the original tenant the pi only and didn't need to for a later tenant but I know there was other info about the case, worth no win no fee tho
                      01-10-2020, 07:12 AM
                    • Deposit Protection Rules?
                      by Nips
                      Hi all ex tenant here, hoping someone can help as I can't find a lot of concrete advice online. Basically, I ended a very stressful tenancy in Aug 2019. There was a lot of back and forth, unclear info, and formal complaints, plus at the end of the tenancy they scalped us with deposit deductions. Just...
                      30-09-2020, 17:43 PM
                    • Reply to Deposit Protection Rules?
                      by MW1985
                      It is worth seeking with a no win no fee firm in this scenario. I would offer my opinion to say that the LA were remiss in not providing you with the deposit information. How were you to know the details contained within the Prescribed Info?
                      It sounds as if some short cuts were taken by the...
                      01-10-2020, 06:05 AM
                    • Reply to Rent arrears recovery from mentally disabled ex-tenant
                      by nukecad
                      LOL, do you not read the news (or do you skip over anything disability/benefit related)?.

                      "Everyones a scrounger" is endemic in the benefits system, from government ministers to jobcentre staff.

                      Here's a particular telling case from last year. - If the DWP employee...
                      01-10-2020, 05:14 AM
                    Working...
                    X