Help! Tenants want to leave after only two months

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Help! Tenants want to leave after only two months

    Ok firstly I am new to these forums, so hi and apologises in advance for what may be quite a long post!

    My husband and I decided to rent our flat out a couple of months ago in order for us to move as the current climate has scuppered any chances we had in selling! We managed all the advertising and AST's etc ourselves successfully and got two good tenants in (Friends). After two days of them being in the property the boiler packed in despite the fact we had a check prior to them moving in. This left them without hot water and heating (At the start of sept) and we endeavoured to sort this through our insurance, which unfortunately for us was a very long winded process and left them without hot water for over two weeks, we then had to pay for a specialist to come in and fix it. During this time we were constantly in contact with them and sent a box of chocs and wine as a way of an apology and agreed to take a week off the first month’s rent. The boiler was fixed and we had not heard from them since rest assured that all was well, until tonight when I received an email to say they had both lost their jobs and other details contributing to the fact they would now like to move out as they do not want to mess us around with rent and are happy for us to keep the deposit!

    My questions is what are our rights? They have been in there less than two months, in theory have only paid 3 weeks rent in that time (They are due to pay us again in a couple of days) and we are now nearing Christmas when it will be harder for us to find new tenants. They signed a 6 months AST on moving in. Part of me questions if they have both lost their jobs. Are we within our rights to ask for them to pay until the end of the year and set about finding new tenants immediately? Can we do this and still keep their deposit?

    I would welcome any advice and help!

    Many thanks

  • #2
    They are legally liable for the rent for the whole of the six months, unless you agree to an early surrender of the tenancy (but you are not obliged to do this).

    If your AST agreement allows you to use the deposit for rent, then you can, except that it should be in a protection scheme. Is it?
    'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations


    • #3
      Standard questions to all new-ish landlords:
      1. As MTG says, was the deposit protected
      2. Did you have an EPC completed before you let the property
      3. Do you hold a valid gas safety certificate for any gas appliances

      MTGs post is essentially right, though I would add that although the tenants are liable until the end of the 6 months, if you re-let the property during that 6 months then their liability stops there.


      Latest Activity


      • NTQ during fixed term?
        Can a LL issue a valid NTQ during the six-month fixed term of an AST agreement?
        (A residential let in England.)
        11-08-2017, 14:53 PM
      • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
        Except that the repossession order doesn't actually end the tenancy either, it simply says that it must end.
        Then, either the tenant has to surrender the property to comply with the order or the order has to be executed by bailiifs.
        Which actually ends the tenancy.

        So the court...
        22-08-2017, 12:59 PM
      • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
        Which came first, the chicken, or the egg? ...
        22-08-2017, 12:55 PM
      • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
        I'm pretty unlikely to agree with anything you write, as a matter of general principle; and certainly, see no value in debating why. I wish you a good afternoon....
        22-08-2017, 12:52 PM
      • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
        Let's try to construct that piece of legislation.

        (1) & (2) can stand on its own. There's no inconsistence to prevent accepting that a tenant leaving after receiving a s21 before/without court is leaving "as a result of the service of a notice". The bit some have difficuities...
        22-08-2017, 12:14 PM
      • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
        The legislation the says that also says that it must happen at a hearing that is impossible.

        It has to happen at a repossession hearing when the tenancy has ended as a "result" of a s21 (and ended during a tenancy period to require a rebate).

        The only possible scenario...
        22-08-2017, 10:20 AM
      • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
        It's perfectly simple. Either you accept the tenancy ended as a result of the section 21 or don't.

        By taking the keys back and control of the property you are somehow accepting the surrender. Now, if you have no written notice from the tenant or deed of surrender your most definitely accepting...
        22-08-2017, 09:59 AM
      • S21 and refunds
        Because the poor old OP of THIS THREAD has seen it derailed by a long but nevertheless valid debate/argument/discussion about the interpretation of law, I've started a new thread because the discussion has raised some questions I'd like answers to.

        Say I have a tenant, whose AST started...
        18-08-2017, 05:52 AM
      • Reply to S21 and refunds
        er... perhaps pedant would be more apropros ...
        22-08-2017, 09:39 AM
      • Tenants reporting damp issues in flat

        I rent out a modern / purpose built ground floor flat which I've owned for c15 years and lived in it myself up until the last few years when I have rented it out. Never had any issues with damp when I was living there or with past tenants, however, the current tenants have reported...
        16-08-2017, 16:53 PM