Impotent lettings agents and pointless Inventory Company reports?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Impotent lettings agents and pointless Inventory Company reports?

    We signed an agreement through a letting agent 3 years ago, which included a full inspection before we moved in, and then upon exiting 3 years later.

    The inventory company found the flat to be in the same condition as when we moved in, and barring £10 worth of damage to the wall where it had been chipped, made no other costs against us.

    the letting agents believed we'd get our damage deposit back in weeks.

    After a month we called the letting agent, it seems the landlord felt that there were repairs to be made and did not want to take the inventory company report into account.

    The estate agent cannot release monies without the landlord's agreement, so now we are stuck in limbo having entered this agreement in good faith. Do I have any rights here outside of legal action? And can I hold the estate agent responsible in any way for not adequately representing us - it's been 2 months now.

  • #2
    I've posted about this on the formum within the last few days so it's worth a look at other threads - just search my posts in the last 7 days using the search tool.

    You have no legal relationship with the agent, only the landlord. If you lived there for three years then the landlord has to accept an amount of wear and tear reflecting this, and that might even include slight chips to plaster. £10 must be shown to have been the actual cost of repair, not some "imagined" amount. It's being extremely petty. Dig your heels in and don't take any flak!

    Write to the landlord c/o the agent and head it "without prejudice" which means you are still willing to negotiate, demanding that if your deposit is not returned in full within 7 days you will instigate court proceedings against him for its recovery. You will almost certainly win in court given the evidence of the inventory company. Judges don't like "cute" landlords.
    The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.


    Latest Activity


    • if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
      Our 6 month short term assured tenancy agreement ended on the 2nd August. We are with a reputable agency. We were invited to renew for a further 6 months back in July and were asked to email our confirmation that we wish to renew in writing. This I did. We were sent the renewal tenancy to sign. We have...
      22-08-2017, 14:00 PM
    • Reply to if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
      I would say your original AST continues as SPT.
      If now a new verbal AST, you may have a new fixed term and you cannot serve NTQ during fixed term (6 months?).
      Talk to LL directly, rather than LA.
      Why did you agree to a new AST, rather than request rolling over to SPT....
      23-08-2017, 00:30 AM
    • 6 year deposit claim
      Hi guys, I know that a tenant can claim a penalty on an unprotected deposit but I just wondered when the 6 year clock starts ticking.
      22-08-2017, 16:43 PM
    • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
      As memory fades over time, can someone provide a 'sticky' for dates when key elements of LL&T Legislation changed? I believe Apr 2012 predates later deposit timescales.
      23-08-2017, 00:08 AM
    • NTQ during fixed term?
      Can a LL issue a valid NTQ during the six-month fixed term of an AST agreement?
      (A residential let in England.)
      11-08-2017, 14:53 PM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      It's worth noting that guidance is under part 4 where tenant obviously is given notice to end of a period and therefore apportionment would not be applicable.

      The reference to the notice to quit ending the tenancy on the notice date does not change the fact that it obviously does however,...
      22-08-2017, 23:24 PM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      I think thats exactly what the section I have just quoted confirms.

      And thereafter, if you choose not to accept they are leaving as a result of the section 21 you must insist on a notice to quit or await a court ordering possession (where you will be ordered to apportion anyway)
      22-08-2017, 23:13 PM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      A lot of energy has been expended in this debate. It has been suggested a LL has no need to take Court action if T apparently vacates after receiving a s21 but with no Notice. LL cannot safely assume has vacated without Court confirmation, to avoid a T allegation of 'illegal eviction'. Equally I would...
      22-08-2017, 23:00 PM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      If someone could copy and paste section 21 (4) a and b (I'm really not technical!), the law seems to recognise that a tenancy CAN end as a result of a section 21 and before a possession hearing.

      21(4)b........the tenancy could be brought to an end by notice to quit given by the landlord...
      22-08-2017, 22:38 PM
    • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
      Assuming that the money originally paid had been used as a deposit for the single tenant tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days from when the 2012 tenancy started. And... if that was a fixed term tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days for any subseqent renwal and likewise from when it went periodic.
      22-08-2017, 22:22 PM