Notice Period

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Notice Period

    Having had problems with a new tenant, I served a section 21 some three months into the initial term, the repossession date has now passed. The problems cleared and I was happy to let the tenancy continue into a periodic one but now, other problems have surfaced and I have asked them to leave, pointing out that I have already served notice. They stayed on and I have now sent the paperwork to the court. The fourteen day period for them to respond is not yet up so I don't know if they are going to reply to this or not.
    My question is, have I missed anything? I have no problems with the paperwork but from reading some posts it seems that a further notice period may be required as I did not act immediately after the date on the S21. Also, I believe the only defence they may have is hardship, is this correct, there are plenty of similar houses to let in my area so in theory at least, they should not have a problem getting a new place.

  • #2
    Originally posted by MrWoof
    My question is, have I missed anything? I have no problems with the paperwork but from reading some posts it seems that a further notice period may be required as I did not act immediately after the date on the S21.

    The S.21 in valid indefinitely.

    Also, I believe the only defence they may have is hardship,

    That's not a defence, but the judge may give a little more than the usual 2 weeks before repossession date.

    is this correct, there are plenty of similar houses to let in my area so in theory at least, they should not have a problem getting a new place.
    . .

    Comment


    • #3
      There might be difficulties if the tenants can prove they had been allowed to stay at the property after th end of the fixed term. If Mr Woof issues proceedings then a court might decide the action of agreeing to a periodic tenancy was tantamount to withdrawing the S.21 Notice. You can't serve a S.21 Notice and then say, it's okay I'm not going to take steps to evict you yet and you can stay on, but I might in the future. L & T law doesn't work like that!
      The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Paul_f
        You can't serve a S.21 Notice and then say, it's okay I'm not going to take steps to evict you yet and you can stay on, but I might in the future. L & T law doesn't work like that!
        Eh I thought that's exactly what landlords do, see MrSheds comments in this thread and those in the housepricecrash thread he links to.

        http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums...ead.php?t=2137

        Originally posted by MrShed
        It is common practice with many letting agents(indeed some would say good practice, myself included) to issue a Section 21 at the beginning of the tenancy to prevent delays at the end SHOULD the landlord wish to evict ASAP after the fixed term. However, if a S21 is issued in this way it should usually be explained to the tenant that this is exactly what it is for....a safety net, rather than guaranteeing to evict at the end of the fixed term. It does reduce the potential security of tenure for a tenant, but not massively, and if explained properly there is no reason for panic with tenants.

        This S21 will remain valid indefinitely after the fixed term(the true indefinite time allowed has never been tested thoroughly in the courts, but there is no reason in law, or practically in the courts, why such a notice could not remain valid for many years after the fixed term has expired).

        snip...

        There is nothing to say that a S21 must be acted upon at the end of the fixed term of an AST(and before a SPT has begun) for it to remain valid. Saying they can stay on is simply extending the current tenancy into a statutory periodic one, and as such the S21 would remain valid for the duration of the SPT. Had the landlord offered a new 6 month fixed term however, the notice would be invalidated.
        ~~~~~

        Comment


        • #5
          I must say that is what I thought. However, I would probably be more inclined to takes Paul's advice than mine, he knows what he is talking about a lot better than me!
          Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

          Comment


          • #6
            Just to clarify. If a landlord informs a tenant that at determination, as specified within the S.21, he has decided not to "action" the Notice, then a tenant might feel extremely insecure if the S.21 Notice was to be invoked at anytime thereafter at an unknown date.

            Courts will expect a landlord to take action within a reasonable period of it becoming effective, and certainly not by contacting the tenant to say that he is going to "leave it for the time being". It would be a credible defence by the tenant to ask the court to void the S.21 Notice as it would be tantamount to making the tenant feel insecure, and that would be potential harassment under the Protection from Eviciton Act 1977.

            Landlords must be clear if they want to evict a tenant, as the Notice must be without reservation and unequivocal. Any move by the landlord to suggest to the tenant that he might not do so, is within the parameters of possibly voiding the Notice.

            I appreciate a S.21 has no time limit but courts expect landlords to abide by the spirit of the law as well as the letter!
            The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

            Comment


            • #7
              This does seem to be contradictory;

              http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums...9&postcount=33

              Originally posted by Paul_f
              Last week the ARLA/NAEA joint exam board met and I ran this scenario past three of them who were:
              1. Adrian Turner CEO - ARLA
              2. Pauline Makepeace - Senior Lecturer in Housing Law - Reading University
              3. Judienne Wood - ex Bradford & Bingley Lettings & Management Training Officer


              They were quite adamant there was no time limit on a S.21 being valid (Law Student's correct assertion), and if a judge had decided a S.21 should be acted upon within a reasonable time (Andy Parker's opinion), then the judge was wrong; they also went on to say that judges often lacked knowledge of the subject on which they were presiding so left any such incorrect ruling open to appeal. As judges can more often than not be pompous and arrogant this didn't help matters; also they are not known for admitting mistakes.

              I hope this clarifies the opinions posted!

              P.S. Oaktree clearly had a sense of humour failure, but never mind!
              http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums...9&postcount=20

              Originally posted by lawstudent
              For an S21 notice served during the fixed term it does not matter what date it ends on provided it is not during the fixed term and gives at least 2 months notice. So your original notice will not be struck out. Also, the tenancy automatically continues after the notice has expired if the tenant stays in place, and it continues until a court grants possession, so what you are accepting continues to be rent, not mesne profits (although it doesn't matter what you call it).

              And no court would criticise you for giving your tenant a reasonable time to comply with the notice before taking legal action, so the fact that the notice expired 6 months ago does not matter. After all, as you will remember from the story Aesop wrote about you, there's no point haring around when it's slow and sure that wins the race.
              http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums...25&postcount=5

              Originally posted by lawstudent
              Andy is wrong. There is no time limit on issuing proceedings. I know of one case where possession was granted under the accelerated procedure on the basis of a notice that had expired several years before.

              Comment

              Latest Activity

              Collapse

              • Extremely anti-social and criminal tenant -Section 8
                BouwensPB
                I have an extremely anti-social and criminal tenant. My neighbours think she is possibly a sex worker and drugs abusing and dealing. She has made a witnessed and CCTV sited assault on one neighbour and has verbally abused others. 3 crimes have been reported and the local authority talk about making...
                26-07-2017, 16:09 PM
              • Reply to Extremely anti-social and criminal tenant -Section 8
                Galatea
                I have experienced far more dificult cases than that from my neighbour's tenants with my front window and my flat door window cracked.

                Make an offer she cannot refuse. Carrots work better.

                Local Authorities are slow moving because shortage of housing is a problem.
                27-07-2017, 22:25 PM
              • Burglary Damage - Who Pays?
                Pb21
                Our rented flat was broken into, in the process the Yale lock was broken and cost £100 to repair. The landlord is refusing to pay this on the basis we didn’t also lock the door with the mortice lock. We didn’t use the mortice lock as it wasn’t working although the landlord did not know this....
                25-07-2017, 11:40 AM
              • Reply to Burglary Damage - Who Pays?
                Galatea
                Since the Yale was broken it proves the tenants took responsible measures for the security: they locked the door.
                The yale is necessary for security. It is sufficient and safe to use in case of a fire because you could get out quickly operating the lock with the thump ie you don't want to be looking...
                27-07-2017, 22:13 PM
              • One tenant moving out and two remaining - who pays for the checkout/inventory?
                IoIo
                Q1 – Where is the rented property located (England / Wales / Scotland / N Ireland)? England

                Q2 – What type of Tenancy Agreement (TA) is this e.g. sole tenant / multiple tenant / room only? Three people all listed as the Tenant under the agreement

                Q3 – What date did current...
                26-07-2017, 16:38 PM
              • Reply to One tenant moving out and two remaining - who pays for the checkout/inventory?
                IoIo
                Thank you all for your comments. Very useful, informative and much appreciated.

                The tenants are "moving out" on the last day of the current tenancy i.e. at the end of the term. My understanding is that if they're all listed as the "Tenant" then if one gives notice it's...
                27-07-2017, 21:23 PM
              • This is a NO isn't it? Seems iffy to me, what do you think?
                Berlingogirl
                This is a NO isn't it? Seems iffy to me, what do you think? Any insights? My ad is on Gumtree.



                "Hello, I'm A***** a British America Business man, I have a business project in your area and I'll like to rent your apartment for the period of 6 month and I'll like to know...
                27-07-2017, 13:57 PM
              • Reply to This is a NO isn't it? Seems iffy to me, what do you think?
                Berlingogirl
                I'm trying to , jta, but I think he knows I know....
                27-07-2017, 20:16 PM
              • Reply to Extremely anti-social and criminal tenant -Section 8
                Wright76
                You are also aware you are now liable to pay her a penalty of up three times the deposit value?.

                My experience of a drug addict is that they will leave with a financial offering.

                Strike a deal taking into account your likely penalty and eviction costs and offer her an amount...
                27-07-2017, 19:10 PM
              • Reply to Extremely anti-social and criminal tenant -Section 8
                theartfullodger
                Check insurance for what you must do knowing what you do....
                27-07-2017, 19:00 PM
              Working...
              X