Originally posted by mind the gap
View Post
Ensuring complete return of deposit...
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by marcusfox View PostI am inclined to believe they have not done any cleaning in the property, especially as I had to ask them to get a cleaner in to clean the bathroom floor and bath (and to come back and do the bath again as they hadn't done it the first time) and much of the property was dirty when I moved in - noted as dirty on the inventory. There was also a disgustingly dirty bath mat and wooden after shower drainer thing that was literally stuck to the floor with filth that their cleaner just washed around and after I lifted it I was treated to a quantity of the previous resident's body hair.
It will hinge on what the LL can demonstrate the property was like when you moved in and to what extent (if any) it had deteriorated by the time you left. He cannot deduct for fair wear and tear, nor for damage he cannot prove you did, nor for cleaning which made it better than it was when you moved in.
As I said, if you have evidence disporving his claim, so much the better.'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations
Comment
-
Originally posted by mind the gap View PostEr...thank you, we get the idea!
It will hinge on what the LL can demonstrate the property was like when you moved in and to what extent (if any) it had deteriorated by the time you left. He cannot deduct for fair wear and tear, nor for damage he cannot prove you did, nor for cleaning which made it better than it was when you moved in.
As I said, if you have evidence disporving his claim, so much the better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by marcusfox View PostUnfortunately I do not have a detailed photographic record of the initial condition of the property.
If not, and all the inventory says is that the property was in a dirty condition when you took possession of it, then I think he will struggle to convince an adjudicator that he is justified in deducting for cleaning.'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations
Comment
-
Originally posted by marcusfox View PostIndeed, still I can't imagine how a "light clean" is going to cost anything near £90 in the first place - I could have had the place cleaned and repainted professionally for maybe a bit more than that, it's not as if it's a multibedroom house, but a one bedroom flat.'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations
Comment
-
Originally posted by mind the gap View PostIn that case the adjudicator may well throw out the claim on the grounds that your LL is just being greedy. £90 represents about 7- 9 hours' cleaning time. If he cannot persuade the arbitration service that 7-9 hours' cleaning was necessary, then you will probably get the £90 back.
Comment
-
They have just sent me the invoice that I requested - £7 for a lightbulb and £70 for cleaning - a general light clean of the property including the oven (which I never even used, but cleaned along with the rest of the property), and the cooker hob top, along with the fridge - plus VAT.
On my inventory, every item in the property is listed, and where there is a light or other fixture, it is also listed on the inventory. All the items mentioned on the inventory were checked in turn according to their place on the list, as you would expect to do when following a checklist of items. It therefore follows that items not listed on the inventory would not be checked, particulary if you had a limited amount of time to check the whole inventory.
It turns out that recessed into the bottom of the kitchen cabinets (simply marked as "wall mounted kitchen cabinets - fair condition" on the inventory), there are downlighters. One of these was not working, and I'm fairly sure it was not working when I first discovered them, albeit some time after I had handed in the inventory. At the time of discovery it did not strike me that I had not checked these and that they were not listed, and in any case, the inventory had been submitted.
There were several instances where lights were not working when I moved in, and these, where listed, were marked as such on the inventory. The contract says that I am liable for replacing lights when they fail, yet it was not done for when I moved in, in almost half a dozen cases around the property. I have not been charged for these, whether or not they have been replaced for the next tenant, I don't know.
So am I liable for the replacement of a downlighter which wasn't checked because it wasn't listed on the inventory?
Comment
-
if its not on the inventory then they cannot charge for it. simple as
The procedure for using deposit money should be
1. LA writes to you to inform you of what they intend to deduct.
2. YOu write back and confirm you dont wish these deductions to be made.
3. Lodge a dispute with DPS/TDS whoever its with....LA gives you back undisputed amount whilst arbitration decides who gets the other money.
they should never be doing the work without your permission.
do what MTG says and lodge dispute the TDS/DPS and go from there..
Comment
-
Well, I appear to have won the dispute - I contacted the arbitrators as the adjudication looks to have been decided at the end of last month - but the person on the phone told me to call back next week as "they are having trouble getting the money from the agent".
What does this mean exactly? The same as a county court case that you win, but you still don't get your money because the person doesn't want to pay up and there's nothing you can do to force them to pay?
Comment
-
No. An arbitration award (AA) is enforceable by Court proceedings. Provided that the defendant is a "won't pay" rather than a "can't pay", AA and County Court Judgment in favour of the claimant/plaintiff enable extraction of funds from the recalcitrant defendant.JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).
Comment
Latest Activity
Collapse
-
by blinkoAlso if you can check with utility company as well to see if they hVe closed their account...
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
06-03-2021, 07:07 AM -
-
by SpringGreenI am interested to find out whether tenant owe rent from the last rent payment to the day they give notice? In Decemeber I have noticed that October was their last rent payment. I sent them a letter to my Tenants asking for an update but no response *have been sending letters ever since. Last month...
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
04-03-2021, 17:43 PM -
-
by alex1I’m a tenant. I had a new consumer unit fitted last week off the back of an EICR inspection. I was asked to not be in the property while the work was carried out (and I wouldn’t have wanted to be anyway, due to COVID, noise, and the general inconvenience of not having electricity, in that order)....
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
06-03-2021, 00:42 AM -
-
by MorleymanWondered if anyone can clarify where I stand needing to have electrical maintenance carried out on a rental property where tenants work from home due to COVID. The electrician I am using only works weekdays but my tenants have said this work cannot take place during the week as they can’t have the...
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
03-03-2021, 20:43 PM -
-
Reply to Notice period?by KTCBoth section 21 (no reason) and section 8 (ground 1 or 13) are six months at the moment.
If we get to end of the month and the increase notice period is not extended, then s8g13 would only be 2 weeks, but that's a discretionary ground. Section 21 or s8g1 would then be two months.-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
05-03-2021, 22:57 PM -
-
by JarekI know that because of COVID as a landlord I must provide 6 months’ notice (AST fixed term finished, now rolling contract). What about tenants who breached the contract (by subletting) - do I still must give them 6 months notice? Any insight?
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
05-03-2021, 22:22 PM -
-
Reply to Tenants claiming damaged clothingid say its a fault with the building design rather than their lifestyle.
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
05-03-2021, 22:38 PM -
-
by trevor131067Hi
We bought a house which had an excellent surveyors report with no problems at all. The home report had number one next to all the boxes. The house was in tip top condition.
We stayed in the property from November to march without any problems.
we decided to rent out the property...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
05-03-2021, 16:05 PM -
-
Reply to Tenants claiming damaged clothingby AndrewDodYes but which of those say that L is liable for damage to the Fabergé egg?...
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
05-03-2021, 22:04 PM -
-
by MdeBIf you stay there long enough, then you may not have to pay anything (if you are happy to live with it).
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
05-03-2021, 20:57 PM -
Comment