Buying a house with an existing tenant

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Buying a house with an existing tenant

    I have found a property which is the right type/right location that I've been looking for.

    However - it has been on the mkt for 3 - 4 months which is unusual in this area and the estate agent says the owner has been letting the house out to his parents for the past 2/3 years. The want to go onto the council housing list but have been told they cannot do this until a buyer has been found for the house.

    The price has just been reduced which is making it v attractive.

    The agent has said it is definitely vacant possession - but how can this be guaranteed?

    Am I mad to consider viewing this property?

    Thanks

    Bambi

  • #2
    Originally posted by Bambi
    The agent has said it is definitely vacant possession - but how can this be guaranteed?
    Perfectly simple - you will agree a purchase price with the vendor for vacant possession, and you won't pay him any money until the tenants are out. Your solicitor won't let you exchange contracts until then. As far as I know (and I'm not a lawyer) your only real risk would be that the tenants end up not leaving, and that you then withdraw from the sale (thereby wasting any money you've spent on valuations, legal and mortgage fees etc).

    Comment


    • #3
      Unless you can get vacant possession you will only be able to buy this property as a "buy to let".

      It may be important to have the details of the tenancy agreement here and if the purchaser requires it for his or her own immediate occupation?

      If the property has only been let two/three years it should be an AST but you should check the details as to whether any renewal arrangements have been made and when the current period ends.

      There is no guarantee that the current tenants will be rehoused by the Council even if you purchase the property as a buy to let. There might be transactions between the parents and the family that might be regarded as the parents contributing to deliberately making themselves homeless and therefore not qualifying for Council rehousing.

      How cheap is the property in comparison with the other properties you have seen? What rent is being paid and could you afford to invest as a landlord for a short while and give the tenants transferred to you the appropriate notice to quit. Could you withstand say three to four months of procedures to obtain possession and maybe action to recover rent arrears?

      is it worth the grief?
      Vic - wicked landlord
      Any advice or suggestions given in my posts are intended for guidance only and not a substitute for completing full searches on this forum, having regard to the advice of others, or seeking appropriate professional opinion.
      Without Plain English Codes of Practice and easy to complete Prescribed Forms the current law is too complex and is thus neither fair to good tenants nor good landlords.

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks for the advice

        Thanks for your replies folks.

        When the estate agent phoned back with a viewing appt - she told me that the tenants have managed to secure temporary alternative housing so they can vacate as soon as a sale goes through.

        The price is only a little lower than usual but it is a really good location and I reckon with vacant possession being (hopefully) straightforward - it will sell really quickly.

        It sounds promising but I will bear in mind all the advice.

        Thanks again, it's brilliant to have a place to ask such questions and get honest, unbiaised answers.

        Cheers

        Bambi

        Comment


        • #5
          As everyone else has said, it shouldn't be a problem. The term vacant possession must appear in the contract of sale. Provided it does, then it is the vendor's problem to get the tenants out and if they cannot by the time of completion then they must offer to refund your deposit because they cannot complete. You can also consider taking legal action for a refund of your expenses (surveyor, search & solicitor's fees e.t.c.) because the vendor has not completed a binding sale contract on time.

          Go for it!

          P.P.
          Any information given in this post is based on my personal experience as a landlord, what I have learned from this and other boards and elsewhere. It is not to be relied on. Definitive advice is only available from a Solicitor or other appropriately qualified person.

          Comment


          • #6
            I had in mind the concerns about the potential losses to the purchaser as set out in ErictheLobster's post.

            Glad to read the last post that if vacant possession is in the contract and is not complied with by the vendor then all out of pocket expenses of the thwarted purchaser must be met.

            I'm not sure what the situation would be if there are problems with rehousing and the vendor keeps delays signing the contract forcing the purchaser to withdraw from the sale.

            Might it be possible for a preliminary written agreement along the lines that subject to satisfactory title and confirmation of vacant possession etc the purchaser wishes to exchange contracts by a specified date and the vendor will be in a position to give vacant possession on the completion date?

            Go for it!!!!!!!!
            Vic - wicked landlord
            Any advice or suggestions given in my posts are intended for guidance only and not a substitute for completing full searches on this forum, having regard to the advice of others, or seeking appropriate professional opinion.
            Without Plain English Codes of Practice and easy to complete Prescribed Forms the current law is too complex and is thus neither fair to good tenants nor good landlords.

            Comment


            • #7
              Some misleading guidance in the posts in this thread!

              Vendor and buyer are only bound when the contract for sale is signed and exchanged - not before. The contract should state vacant possession - if contracts are signed and exchanged and the vendor fails to remove the tenants then the vendor is liable to compensate the buyer. A solicitor WILL let contracts be exchanged with the tenants still in situ as clauses in the standard contract will lay down what will happen if the sale is unable to be completed.

              If the matter goes up to, but not including exchange of contracts, then either party can withdraw for any reason without liability to the other - this is the time when survey fees and some solicitors fees for searches and other work is completely wasted and is partly why home information packs are being introduced. Buyers often withdraw because of something found out during land searches or surveys which they dont like, and sellers often withdraw because they got a better offer!

              In this particular case of this thread - the solicitor will exchange contracts in due course but will not allow completion until the property is actually empty because "vacant possession" will be an express term of completion.

              Comment

              Latest Activity

              Collapse

              • if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
                Lexy333
                Our 6 month short term assured tenancy agreement ended on the 2nd August. We are with a reputable agency. We were invited to renew for a further 6 months back in July and were asked to email our confirmation that we wish to renew in writing. This I did. We were sent the renewal tenancy to sign. We have...
                22-08-2017, 14:00 PM
              • Reply to if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
                mariner
                I would say your original AST continues as SPT.
                If now a new verbal AST, you may have a new fixed term and you cannot serve NTQ during fixed term (6 months?).
                Talk to LL directly, rather than LA.
                Why did you agree to a new AST, rather than request rolling over to SPT....
                23-08-2017, 00:30 AM
              • 6 year deposit claim
                MaliaZ
                Hi guys, I know that a tenant can claim a penalty on an unprotected deposit but I just wondered when the 6 year clock starts ticking.
                22-08-2017, 16:43 PM
              • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
                mariner
                As memory fades over time, can someone provide a 'sticky' for dates when key elements of LL&T Legislation changed? I believe Apr 2012 predates later deposit timescales.
                23-08-2017, 00:08 AM
              • NTQ during fixed term?
                vpltd
                Hi,
                Can a LL issue a valid NTQ during the six-month fixed term of an AST agreement?
                (A residential let in England.)
                VPL.
                11-08-2017, 14:53 PM
              • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                Wright76
                It's worth noting that guidance is under part 4 where tenant obviously is given notice to end of a period and therefore apportionment would not be applicable.

                The reference to the notice to quit ending the tenancy on the notice date does not change the fact that it obviously does however,...
                22-08-2017, 23:24 PM
              • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                Wright76
                I think thats exactly what the section I have just quoted confirms.

                And thereafter, if you choose not to accept they are leaving as a result of the section 21 you must insist on a notice to quit or await a court ordering possession (where you will be ordered to apportion anyway)
                ...
                22-08-2017, 23:13 PM
              • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                mariner
                A lot of energy has been expended in this debate. It has been suggested a LL has no need to take Court action if T apparently vacates after receiving a s21 but with no Notice. LL cannot safely assume has vacated without Court confirmation, to avoid a T allegation of 'illegal eviction'. Equally I would...
                22-08-2017, 23:00 PM
              • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                Wright76
                If someone could copy and paste section 21 (4) a and b (I'm really not technical!), the law seems to recognise that a tenancy CAN end as a result of a section 21 and before a possession hearing.

                21(4)b........the tenancy could be brought to an end by notice to quit given by the landlord...
                22-08-2017, 22:38 PM
              • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
                KTC
                Assuming that the money originally paid had been used as a deposit for the single tenant tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days from when the 2012 tenancy started. And... if that was a fixed term tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days for any subseqent renwal and likewise from when it went periodic.
                22-08-2017, 22:22 PM
              Working...
              X