Address to serve small claim

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Address to serve small claim

    As a LL, I have been able to recover the deposit from the scheme after a dispute resolution process. However, the tenant owes me more than the deposit amount. Therefore, I would like to claim the remaining amount via courts.

    I have his work address, I know that he forwarded the mail with Royal Mail from the property (i.e. If I send him a letter to the property address, it will be forwarded) and I know that he sometimes stays at the address upstairs.

    The site http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/1051.htm says that I won't be able to use the work address. And if I use the property address, I think this would affect the rating on the address.

    Does tracing tenant services really work?

  • #2
    Originally posted by homer View Post
    As a LL, I have been able to recover the deposit from the scheme after a dispute resolution process. However, the tenant owes me more than the deposit amount. Therefore, I would like to claim the remaining amount via courts.

    I have his work address, I know that he forwarded the mail with Royal Mail from the property (i.e. If I send him a letter to the property address, it will be forwarded) and I know that he sometimes stays at the address upstairs.

    The site http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/1051.htm says that I won't be able to use the work address. And if I use the property address, I think this would affect the rating on the address.

    Does tracing tenant services really work?
    See CPR (civil procedure rules) PART 6 here. All the info you need is there - the rules particularly relevant are: 6.5, 6.9 and 6.15. (I'm not a lawyer and I find it's essential to read the CPR very carefully several times, going back and forth to check all the exclusions etc, before I fully understand the procedure).

    It looks like the easiest way in this situation is to serve claim in person (see rule 6.5(2) ) - you know where he works. Best to hire a Process Server (google & find one with a fixed fee) rather than try to DIY as you could easily make an error and then you're back to square one if it's served incorrectly (for example, you may need a professional witness to provide an affadavit or something - dunno)

    It's also possible to serve at the "last known address" (rule 6.9) if the defendant has not provided a current address for himself or a solicitor for service. See 6.9(3) which says you first have to take "reasonable steps" to trace current address if you know defendant doesn't actually live at the last known address. i.e. have a trace done - doesn't matter if it's unsuccessful because you've taken "reasonable steps".

    However, it may be complicated by the fact that you know his work address. According to CPR 6.9(4 & 5) it looks like you may have to then apply for the court's permission to serve at an alternative address which isn't usually permitted, and in this case it's arguable that his work may be considered an alternative. See rule 6.15.

    Which is why I'm thinking service in person is your easiest, most reliable, option in this situation.
    Last edited by westminster; 31-05-2009, 17:52 PM. Reason: spelling

    Comment

    Latest Activity

    Collapse

    • NTQ during fixed term?
      vpltd
      Hi,
      Can a LL issue a valid NTQ during the six-month fixed term of an AST agreement?
      (A residential let in England.)
      VPL.
      11-08-2017, 14:53 PM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      jpkeates
      Except that the repossession order doesn't actually end the tenancy either, it simply says that it must end.
      Then, either the tenant has to surrender the property to comply with the order or the order has to be executed by bailiifs.
      Which actually ends the tenancy.

      So the court...
      22-08-2017, 12:59 PM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      StuartH
      Which came first, the chicken, or the egg? ...
      22-08-2017, 12:55 PM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      StuartH
      I'm pretty unlikely to agree with anything you write, as a matter of general principle; and certainly, see no value in debating why. I wish you a good afternoon....
      22-08-2017, 12:52 PM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      KTC
      Let's try to construct that piece of legislation.

      (1) & (2) can stand on its own. There's no inconsistence to prevent accepting that a tenant leaving after receiving a s21 before/without court is leaving "as a result of the service of a notice". The bit some have difficuities...
      22-08-2017, 12:14 PM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      jpkeates
      The legislation the says that also says that it must happen at a hearing that is impossible.

      It has to happen at a repossession hearing when the tenancy has ended as a "result" of a s21 (and ended during a tenancy period to require a rebate).

      The only possible scenario...
      22-08-2017, 10:20 AM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      Wright76
      It's perfectly simple. Either you accept the tenancy ended as a result of the section 21 or don't.

      By taking the keys back and control of the property you are somehow accepting the surrender. Now, if you have no written notice from the tenant or deed of surrender your most definitely accepting...
      22-08-2017, 09:59 AM
    • S21 and refunds
      tatemono
      Because the poor old OP of THIS THREAD has seen it derailed by a long but nevertheless valid debate/argument/discussion about the interpretation of law, I've started a new thread because the discussion has raised some questions I'd like answers to.

      Say I have a tenant, whose AST started...
      18-08-2017, 05:52 AM
    • Reply to S21 and refunds
      tatemono
      er... perhaps pedant would be more apropros ...
      22-08-2017, 09:39 AM
    • Tenants reporting damp issues in flat
      james99
      Hi,

      I rent out a modern / purpose built ground floor flat which I've owned for c15 years and lived in it myself up until the last few years when I have rented it out. Never had any issues with damp when I was living there or with past tenants, however, the current tenants have reported...
      16-08-2017, 16:53 PM
    Working...
    X