L charges admin. fee to avoid deposit protection

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    L charges admin. fee to avoid deposit protection

    Please excuse me if this has already been discussed and i've missed it...

    There is a growing number of landlords in this area taking 'admin fees' to avoid TDP schemes and leaving behind the 'why bother' it's concerning that the deposit protection could be making thigs worse for tenants.

    The 'admin fees' taken are anywhere from 300 - 600 and non returnable. There was, i'm told, a local solicitor who challenged a landlord about this in one case and it was ruled in the landlords favour in court as the tenant 'did not have to accept these charges and could have gone elsewhere' and the DJudge expressed concern that the contents of the fee could not be broken down but there was no case for it being a deposit as it was non returnable.

    Is this correct and if so has the new laws actually made in worse for tenantts in some cases??
    Always double check advice... not just mine!

    #2
    Nothing prohibits L and T from agreeing what they like in Tenancy Agreement. See definition of 'deposit' below [s.212(8) of Housing Act 2004].

    "tenancy deposit, in relation to a[n assured] shorthold tenancy, means any money intended to be held (by the landlord or otherwise) as security for:
    (a) the performance of any obligations of the tenant, or
    (b) the discharge of any liability of his,

    arising under or in connection with the tenancy.

    So anything not "as security" is not a deposit.
    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

    Comment


      #3
      So as it's not being returned it doesn't count. I can understand the reasoning and have no doubt your correct!

      I'm concerned this will spread, become the norm, and put tenants in a worse financial position than previously as it will be as if every deposit is not returned. (although it's not technically a deposit!)

      Doom and Gloom
      Always double check advice... not just mine!

      Comment


        #4
        I think we need to know the full facts and what was pleaded before we can decide whether the learned judge "erred in the law".

        Comment


          #5
          I would like to know in which court this was held as it's an important case.
          The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

          Comment


            #6
            I don't have the full details of the case as i wasn't directly involved. Was told the outcome more than the story which was that it was held a fee paid at the beginning of the tenancy to set it up which was non returnable could not be held as a deposit. It was held in 'Greater Grimsby County Court'.

            There is apparently also a case ongoing in the same court against a landlord who took either 4 or 6 months rent in advance. Think it a little more invoved than just that! The solicitor saying it was being held 'as security' so i'm waiting to see what the outcome of that one is too.
            Always double check advice... not just mine!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Impartial Advice View Post
              I don't have the full details of the case as i wasn't directly involved. Was told the outcome more than the story which was that it was held a fee paid at the beginning of the tenancy to set it up which was non returnable could not be held as a deposit. It was held in 'Greater Grimsby County Court'.

              There is apparently also a case ongoing in the same court against a landlord who took either 4 or 6 months rent in advance. Think it a little more invoved than just that! The solicitor saying it was being held 'as security' so i'm waiting to see what the outcome of that one is too.

              Paying six, or even twelve months' rent in advance is the only way some international students are able to secure accommodation without having a UK guarantor, so that's not a new development.

              The sky-high admin fees, I suspect, will just not stand up to market forces. It's a dog-eat-dog world out there among the agents and unless every landlord uses an agent who charged a ludicrously high 'admin' fee, tenants will desert the 'sharks' for LLs who let their properties out privately without using an agent, or for those wiser agents who have stuck with a 'reasonable' admin fee. Tenants are not stupid. They don't particularly like parting with £300 as a deposit even when they know they will get it back. They will be even less willing to throw the same amount into an agent's bank account with no prospect of seeing it again.


              No-brainer
              'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by mind the gap View Post
                The sky-high admin fees, I suspect, will just not stand up to market forces. It's a dog-eat-dog world out there among the agents and unless every landlord uses an agent who charged a ludicrously high 'admin' fee, tenants will desert the 'sharks' for LLs who let their properties out privately without using an agent, or for those wiser agents who have stuck with a 'reasonable' admin fee. Tenants are not stupid. They don't particularly like parting with £300 as a deposit even when they know they will get it back. They will be even less willing to throw the same amount into an agent's bank account with no prospect of seeing it again.


                No-brainer

                I would agree it should work like that except there are, unfortunately, a whole bunch of uneducated tenants out there! and it appears the most vunerable are the ones that end up with these problems. in this area there is no shortage of housing but horrible shortage of landlord s willing to let to LHA tenants... not that thats suprising with the stupid rules
                Always double check advice... not just mine!

                Comment

                Latest Activity

                Collapse

                • solicitors fees
                  by rob1648
                  Hi all , finally managed to get my tenant evicted after 18 months of hell using high court bailiffs , house now sold so happy days, we tried initially to do the section 21ourselves but made mistakes which citizens advice happily pointed out to our tenant so we decided to use a solicitor to act for us...
                  29-07-2021, 15:19 PM
                • Reply to Building damage?
                  by ram
                  Not to put a damper on things, but insurance is for accidents / unforseen occurences / trees falling on building / cars.- etc

                  Insurance does not cover for deliberate acts which caused a fault.
                  Thats why why drill round holes in bricks, put a plug in it then screw though the plug.
                  ...
                  29-07-2021, 13:05 PM
                • Building damage?
                  by lampshade
                  I have noticed that one of the 3 blocks has some studs hammered into the brickwork in one corner. There are also cracks running down the bricks. I am guessing that these studs are markers made by an engineer at some point, suggesting a structural issue maybe.
                  In the event that any further opening...
                  29-07-2021, 11:11 AM
                • Reply to Building damage?
                  by lampshade
                  Within the service charge there is of course a charge for Insurance. Presume if any work ever needs doing it would come from that Insurance policy? And then possibly an increase in future Insurance cost
                  29-07-2021, 12:33 PM
                • Reply to Help! Sub tenant with no contract eviction rights
                  by Yasmenaax
                  Thanks for the response. Just wondering how I am not a tenant here though? Since there is a verbal agreement, I have been paying rent to her and she does not live in the property....
                  29-07-2021, 12:25 PM
                • Help! Sub tenant with no contract eviction rights
                  by Yasmenaax
                  Hi there,

                  I moved into a property 2-3 months ago which was subletted to me by a girl named on the main tenancy contract of the property. I handed over a deposit (which is currently unprotected) and have paid rent on time. She today decided to give me notice to leave, giving me only 2 weeks...
                  29-07-2021, 02:19 AM
                • Reply to Isolating beyond the end of a fixed term
                  by HantsAgent
                  Indeed. And my worry for the tenants here is that this technically means their tenancy could have continued for an effective additional two months (unable to give a valid NtQ until the beginning of the next tenancy period and that notice having to be a full tenancy period)



                  ...
                  29-07-2021, 11:52 AM
                • Isolating beyond the end of a fixed term
                  by HantsAgent
                  Is anyone aware of anything giving tenants some leeway if they have to isolate and it takes them beyond of their fixed term?

                  I'm trying to help the student son of a friend whose landlord appears to be being a little opportunistic because they had to stay in the property for a few days over...
                  28-07-2021, 12:56 PM
                • Reply to Building damage?
                  by ash72
                  It would only be an insurance issue if the freeholder has an adequate policy covering it. The best thing is for the freeholder or managing agent to instruct an engineer who will put movement detectors on the property and see if there is any movement. It could be historical.

                  All leaseholders...
                  29-07-2021, 11:33 AM
                • Reply to Washing machine meter legality
                  by landlord-man
                  HaHa - I had already planned for that.

                  My power sockets are behind a locked cupboard so they can only access the coin meters.

                  I also put the communal wifi router power socket in a locked cupboard - otherwise, they could add an adapter socket to the router mains and run an extension...
                  29-07-2021, 10:36 AM
                Working...
                X