Notices- s.8/s.21- and rent recovery

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Notices- s.8/s.21- and rent recovery

    firstly is it correct that if you wish to get money owed you need to serve s.8 notice or can you serve section 21 and then just not go down the posession proceedings route?

    secondly i have some issues with calculating the notice periods - if an AST is continuing and start date was say 18th March would you say date tenancy meant to come to an end was 17th September or would it be 18th?

    thanks for help

    #2
    Originally posted by mousey View Post
    firstly is it correct that if you wish to get money owed you need to serve s.8 notice or can you serve section 21 and then just not go down the posession proceedings route?
    Neither Notice is itself a debt claim. Both seek to terminate the AST and regain possession for L.

    Originally posted by mousey View Post
    secondly i have some issues with calculating the notice periods - if an AST is continuing and start date was say 18th March would you say date tenancy meant to come to an end was 17th September or would it be 18th?
    If a six-month AST period begins on 18 March, it is treated as beginning at the start of that day (0000hrs.) and including the whole day

    So the period ends at 2400hrs. on 17 September. That's why such a Notice is usually set to expire 'after 17 September', i.e. once that whole day has ended, rather than 'on 17 September'- what earlier point in the day would 'on' mean?
    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

    Comment


      #3
      Thanks for the response - in terms of the first question i meant if you are seeking money and posession do you have to use s.8 notice? as if you use s.21 is that just for the accelerated procedure where you cant get a order for money?

      re the second question in my OP thank you - i was wondering this in order to work out when tenancy came to an end to then work out when notice should be given (if that makes sense!). ie if tenancy started on 18th March and two months notice required (rent payable monthly) is the expiry of the notice then not before 17th Novemeber?

      Comment


        #4
        On your second paragraph: if you mean s.21, the Notice:
        a. can be served at any time once the AST has started; but
        b. cannot take effect before (at the earliest) the AST has ended.
        JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
        1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
        2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
        3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
        4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

        Comment


          #5
          sorry the AST has ended and has continued... :S

          Comment


            #6
            S.8 allows you to include any unpaid rent providing you don't want to use the Accelerated Possession Procedure, and providing it meets the requirements of two months unpaid rent at the time of service of the Notice and at the hearing too, if rent is payable (reserved) monthly.
            The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
              Neither Notice is itself a debt claim. Both seek to terminate the AST and regain possession for L.


              If a six-month AST period begins on 18 March, it is treated as beginning at the start of that day (0000hrs.) and including the whole day

              So the period ends at 2400hrs. on 17 September. That's why such a Notice is usually set to expire 'after 17 September', i.e. once that whole day has ended, rather than 'on 17 September'- what earlier point in the day would 'on' mean?
              Thank-you for the explanation regarding why we use "after" rather than "on". However, just to be pernickety, I'd suggest that "after" is similarly lacking in precision - how much after midnight on the 17th, does "after" mean? Wouldn't "immediately after" be better?

              Comment


                #8
                Also if you go down the s8 route you will have to go to the court hearing but if you use the s21 and its not defended you shouldnt have to.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
                  Neither Notice is itself a debt claim. Both seek to terminate the AST and regain possession for L.


                  If a six-month AST period begins on 18 March, it is treated as beginning at the start of that day (0000hrs.) and including the whole day

                  So the period ends at 2400hrs. on 17 September. That's why such a Notice is usually set to expire 'after 17 September', i.e. once that whole day has ended, rather than 'on 17 September'- what earlier point in the day would 'on' mean?
                  "on" implies within or before, a 24hr window
                  "after" just means not before. and is VERY openended.
                  ?

                  The Rodent
                  A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
                  W.Churchill

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Rodent1 View Post
                    "on" implies within or before, a 24hr window
                    "after" just means not before. and is VERY openended.
                    Yes. L is entitled to start possession proceedings at any time AFTER the s.21 Notice's expiry.
                    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I think you will find that you can instigate proceedings before the S.21 Notice has expired providing the hearing date is after that date.
                      The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Paul_f View Post
                        I think you will find that you can instigate proceedings before the S.21 Notice has expired providing the hearing date is after that date.
                        That hadn't occurred to me, but- yes- nothing in the 1988 Act (s.7, s.21, or otherwise) demands that the s.21 Notice must expire before L applies to Court. However, I suppose that the CPR might impose extra procedural restrictions on applications.
                        JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                        1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                        2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                        3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                        4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by johnboy View Post
                          Also if you go down the s8 route you will have to go to the court hearing but if you use the s21 and its not defended you shouldnt have to.
                          but if you go down s.21 route you cant recover the outstanding rent so isnt it better just to use s.8 route?

                          Comment


                            #14
                            s8 allows a judgment for arrears but T can enter defences eg disrepair etc etc etc whereas defences such as that will not be considered by the court under s21.

                            LL has to weigh up which process is best for him - is a CCJ going to get T to pay? If T is a man of straw may be a waste of time and money
                            PAUL GIBBS, solicitor, Jacobs & Reeves. My comments on this forum are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. No responsibility or liability is accepted by reason of reliance upon such comments. This disclaimer would not apply to direct clients of Jacobs & Reeves where there is a valid retainer in place and I would be happy to confirm any advice if formally instructed. . Jacobs & Reeves now offer a fixed fee possession service.

                            Comment

                            Latest Activity

                            Collapse

                            • Small damage to landlords wooden floor...
                              Killuzka
                              Hello,

                              ​​​​​Im new here so I hope i posted in right section.

                              ​​​​​​I have a problem, I was helping out a friend and I kept her cat at my place for a few days, because it all came so fast i had to make a toilet really fast for cat .. it was from cardboard...
                              15-01-2018, 19:42 PM
                            • Reply to Small damage to landlords wooden floor...
                              jpkeates
                              The landlord is able to claim for any loss beyond fair wear and tear that occurs during the tenancy.
                              The damage isn't fair wear and tear, so the landlord can ask you for compensation.

                              Will the landlord even notice before you move out - which is when any claim can be made?
                              Otherwise,...
                              16-01-2018, 09:26 AM
                            • Am I locked in to agency fees?
                              SaurfLondonLad
                              I am just coming to the end of my first year of being a LL on a property which I self manage. My tenants are great and I now wish to ditch my agent to save them and me money and collect the rent myself. The agent's contract does clearly state that fees are liable for as long as the tenant resides. This...
                              15-01-2018, 20:02 PM
                            • Reply to Am I locked in to agency fees?
                              jpkeates
                              Don't lie to the agent - they're not (that) stupid, and then you would owe them the fees if they claimed them.

                              I'd try and negotiate a deal - for most businesses a large chunk of income today is worth more than the promise of income month by month.

                              The agent's business model...
                              16-01-2018, 09:24 AM
                            • Termination of Tenancy
                              janeygee
                              Hi,
                              looking for some practical advice here, first post.I shall try to hit the main points and be brief.
                              I have been renting my house to a couple whilst I have been out of the UK with a private rental contract, visiting the house once a year. They have been renting for 10 years , on a one...
                              15-01-2018, 15:34 PM
                            • Reply to Termination of Tenancy
                              jpkeates
                              The tenant "gave" the landlord the light fittings and power sockets when they fitted them to the landlord's property.
                              They can't return the property with holes where they used to be - that isn't fair wear and tear.
                              They could replace them with sockets and light fittings equivalent...
                              16-01-2018, 09:19 AM
                            • Letting in name of a Ltd company
                              matt.svppli
                              Hi,

                              I have a quick question to ask.
                              Is it generally acceptable to sign a tenancy agreement in name of one's business and make rent payments via a business account?

                              The idea here is that part of the rented house would work as a home office, therefore I would like the payments...
                              15-01-2018, 14:16 PM
                            • Reply to Letting in name of a Ltd company
                              theartfullodger
                              That would be fraud (probably, based on what OP stated), a criminal offence...
                              16-01-2018, 09:18 AM
                            • Deposit not Protected
                              prm70115
                              Hi there,

                              I have recently found out the the agent (working for the landlord) has not protected my deposit paid Summer 2017 for a 6 month tenancy. The tenancy is up in 2 weeks and I have been asked if I want to renew which I would like to do as I wish to stay in the property.

                              ...
                              15-01-2018, 11:42 AM
                            • Reply to Deposit not Protected
                              theartfullodger
                              You are, in my opinion, better off with an unprotected deposit. No s21 eviction notice can be valid until they return deposit in full & you can sue for up to 3xdeposit penalty. So don;t ask for it to be protected. If they anyway protect it both of these are still true.

                              Do nothing....
                              16-01-2018, 09:17 AM
                            Working...
                            X