DSS tenant doesn't want partner on lease

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DSS tenant doesn't want partner on lease

    A prospective tenant with 3 young children, 1 disabled doesn't want her partner named on the lease, presumably this is because it would affect her benefits. If the LL or agent agree to this - is this fraudulent?

    Answers on a postcard.....

    R

  • #2
    Common sense - Yes. If you have strong reason to believe that it is because they wish to commit fraud and they have absolutely no genuine reason then surely it would be aiding and abetting or similar.
    [I]The opinions I give are simply my opinions and interpretations of what I have learnt, in numerous years as a property professional, I would not rely upon them without consulting with a paid advisor and providing them with all the relevant facts[I]

    Comment


    • #3
      I do not know if it is fraudulent.

      I would reference and credit check them both. If they are both still in the running, put both names on the tenancy agreement.

      In situations where I have one prospective tenant earning significantly more than the other, I still reference them both and put both names on the tenancy agreement. I do this because I don't want to risk a situation where the more solvent tenant departs leaving the less solvent lodger and you do not have a tenancy agreement with them. That's when things start getting messy.

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks. I don't have a strong reason to believe they want to commit fraud -I understand its a fairly new relationship. The mother is exceptionally nice and had a good career until a few years ago when she had give it up to become a full time carer for her disabled daughter.

        She has excellent references and I have spoken to her current landlord. The only query is the unwillingness to include the partner on the tenancy.

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks Poppy.

          I agree - would reference them both.

          The mother is the one with the higher income (benefit entitlement). If she was the only person named on the lease and decided to give up the lease, surely he wouldn't have any rights as a lodger?

          Comment


          • #6
            If it is a fairly new relationship, she may be reluctant to give him any security of tenure by including him in the tenancy agreement.
            Mrs Jones
            I am not an expert - my posts are my opinion and should not be taken as fact!!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Rebecca12
              If she was the only person named on the lease and decided to give up the lease, surely he wouldn't have any rights as a lodger?
              That's right. You sound like you are clued up enough to make the right decision for your letting business.

              Comment


              • #8
                I'm going to take that as a compliment Poppy, given your level of experience!

                cheers
                R

                Comment


                • #9
                  If his name is on the tenancy then it will mean her benefits will be different - mainly LHA or Housing benefit depending on the system your council use.

                  Legally the 'boyfriend' is not allowed to live at the property if she is claiming benefits as a single mum. If the council find out in the future, they can claw back the monies paid from the landlord.

                  Even if the tenant is nice and all that, him living at the house would be fraud and if you know about it the council would expect you to tell them.

                  If they did find out and she could no longer pay rent, it may prove costly.

                  Comment

                  Latest Activity

                  Collapse

                  • Mouldy silicone wear and tear?
                    aciduzzo
                    Tenants are moving out today and i am doing the final inspection later; however, last time i was at the flat i noticed the bathroom was in a poor state.

                    What is the general opinion on black mould that has formed inside bathroom silicone? Is it considered wear and tear? Also, the seal...
                    03-07-2017, 08:07 AM
                  • Reply to Mouldy silicone wear and tear?
                    mystic08
                    You might like to gift your new tenants some Kilrock mould cleaner which is magic in a bottle! Cheapest in the Pound shop or The Range but supermarkets sell it too. Works brilliantly on algae too. Garden pots, patios, headstones etc.
                    22-07-2017, 20:52 PM
                  • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                    MrShed
                    I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

                    I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
                    20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
                  • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                    jjlandlord
                    That's the exemption that allows sending data outside of the EEA, which is the issue discussed.



                    No, because of that very exemption....
                    22-07-2017, 19:19 PM
                  • Referencing question
                    kangoo1
                    A couple wants to rent from me, she is on maternity leave and will not be returning to her previous employment, he is permanently employed and moving due to a job transfer. I have referenced him for the full rent and his guarantor has been successfully referenced.
                    I am going to prepare the ast...
                    22-07-2017, 17:19 PM
                  • Claiming for protected deposit
                    mandm
                    This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
                    Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
                    I served the...
                    21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
                  • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                    JK0
                    I'll leave it at that. I'm not going to get into one of JPK's interminable arguments.
                    22-07-2017, 16:28 PM
                  • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                    jpkeates
                    That's simply one of the Schedule 2 exemptions which, if met, allows a process using personal data at all - all the other principles still apply in parallel (where it can be stored, be not excessive, kept up to date etc).

                    So, while it might be OK because it relates to a contract, there...
                    22-07-2017, 15:22 PM
                  • Excessive estate agent fees
                    Cml241
                    I have a property which I started renting out via an agency. When the contract started, they found new tenants, did the relevant checks etc and charged an upfront fee which equates to approx one month's rent. As one year has almost passed, the agent has approached me asking if I want them to 'renegotiate'...
                    21-07-2017, 16:26 PM
                  • Reply to Excessive estate agent fees
                    mariner
                    A new 12 month fixed term does provide LL & T with extra security but can lead to complications for either if their resp circumstances/legislation change during the new AST.
                    Personally, I would prefer if a orig AST was for a fixed 6 month term, followed by an SPT that required both LL &...
                    22-07-2017, 14:09 PM
                  Working...
                  X