L and T agree an early surrender; can L now re-let?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • L and T agree an early surrender; can L now re-let?

    Hi,

    I hope you fine people can give me some help with a tenant of mine.

    Tenant wanted to end AST 6 months early. I agreed that this was OK on the condition that T paid costs in finding replacement and any deficit in Rent for the next 6 months (rents have dropped in my area). I have consistently made it clear that the original contract would only be surrendered once a new tenant was found and the replacement costs paid by T.

    T has been arguing these costs with myself and my agent and meanwhile we have found a potential replacement who is currently being reference checked. However, T now considers that a replacement has been found (despite no agreement being reached regarding replacement costs, nothing signed and the replacement not having yet passed referencing checks). T has now moved out (has not returned keys) and underpaid the rent such that it only covers the rent due IF the new tenant was to move in. T has not paid anything towards the other costs of finding a new tenant (Check Out, rent deficit etc.) so I consider the original contract still valid and not surrendered. I also consider T to be in default since T has underpaid this months rent.

    I want the current T out and the new T in. However, I am wary of releasing the current T from the contract in case this makes it impossible for me to subsequently claim the costs getting a replacement in. Does surrendering a contract mean that T is no longer liable for these costs? Can I phrase the document surrendering the tenancy in such a way that it is clear that T still owes me money. Does anyone have any other advice? Maybe I can then claim these costs from the Deposit (which is in the TDS scheme)? Or in a small claims court? I know I can just demand the tenant stay and pay the rent, but I would rather get a new and less difficult T in.

    Many thanks in advance,

  • #2
    IF you accept T1's surrender (which you do not have to do), you end T1's liability for future rent.
    Until then (or until a deemed surrender (by T1) on you re-letting (to T2)), T1 remains liable. T1 is thus liable whether still residing or gone.
    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

    Comment


    • #3
      Many Thanks for the quick reply Jeffrey. However, I'm confused about a couple of things...

      1. What is a deemed surrender? Is that when I re-let the property out to another tenant? I don't understand how I can legally do that. Neither I nor the tenant has signed a document surrendering the contract so surely T has the right of access to the property until such a document is signed, T is evicted or the fixed term expires?

      2. What I am really interested in is getting the current tenant to pay the costs of getting a replacement in. T has already paid rent up to the replacement's (provisional) move in date. I think T is happy to do that, the problem is getting T to pay the other costs (which including the rent deficit are not inconsiderable). I would like to release T from contract. Preferably after T has paid the replacement costs. However, if T refuses to pay these costs my question is can we sign a document surrendering the tenancy (i.e. T is no longer liable for rent form the date of surrender) but insisting that T is legally liable for the costs of the replacement.

      Comment


      • #4
        If T1 accepts (tacitly) that you are free to re-let (e.g. T1 agrees how much is payable to/by him, and it's paid), that effectively amounts to a surrender by the parties' actions. Clearly there are dangers (e.g. if T1 turns round and claims that his tenancy is still running, for instance).
        JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
        1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
        2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
        3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
        4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

        Comment

        Latest Activity

        Collapse

        • Claiming for protected deposit
          mandm
          This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
          Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
          I served the...
          21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
          MrShed
          JK - there are *some* upsides of taking a deposit. The main two for me:
          1) Regardless of what it can feel like on here, the majority of tenants do not know they can play the system in this way.
          2) There is something to be said for the mindset of a tenant who has something "invested"...
          21-07-2017, 08:19 AM
        • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
          MrShed
          I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

          I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
          20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
        • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
          jpkeates
          The ICO should be fining landlords for not registering as data processors - they're not.

          The maximum amount of personal data held by landlords and agents arises out of tenant referencing, and, if that were to be destroyed after a couple of months, most landlords would arguably be pretty...
          21-07-2017, 08:16 AM
        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
          JK0
          I'm afraid this rant won't help you much o/p, but:

          STILL!? Still landlords are giving tenants a way to wheedle thousands out of them for no good reason?

          I have come to the conclusion this whole deposit protection nonsense is a government sponsored scam. There is barely any...
          21-07-2017, 08:12 AM
        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
          jpkeates
          They are probably claiming that you didn't protect the deposit and give them the Prescribed Information document, both of which you are required to do within 30 days of receipt of the deposit.

          If you didn't do both things to the appropriate deadline, you didn't protect the deposit correctly....
          21-07-2017, 08:09 AM
        • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
          jjlandlord
          Source: http://news.pwc.ch/31824/gdpr-key-ch...-eu-companies/

          That being said, I don't think it will have much impact on landlords:



          I don't think that'll be the case. References are legitimate and widespread.



          ...
          21-07-2017, 07:51 AM
        • Help. Scam/ fraud letting
          Hayleydenice93
          Hiya

          i need some advise on my situation in regards to this flat offered to me and my partner. We viewed a flat which was in an old office block which had been converted into service apartments and then refurbished into flats.

          The agency we viewed the flats through did not want...
          20-07-2017, 20:59 PM
        • Reply to Help. Scam/ fraud letting
          theartfullodger
          You do not have to own a place to be the Landlord. Suspect they rent from owner (their Landlord), they then rent (as your Landlord) to you.

          Doubt there's any chance of getting proper tenancy from them. You could sign licence, move in, then try and get rights as an AST Tenant (eg sue for...
          21-07-2017, 07:46 AM
        • Claiming for Non protected deposit
          charliesugar
          This is posted on behalf of my cleaner who approached me for help after her last landlord failed to reply to her repeated requests for return of her deposit.
          She rented a room in a shared house in London, AST, weekly rent all paid on time. Notice given and accepted, room left neat and clean....
          27-06-2017, 13:18 PM
        Working...
        X