Possession Order - Civil Procedure Rule 55.16(4)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Possession Order - Civil Procedure Rule 55.16(4)

    I am in the knowledge of this site very late but I hope I will get advice from the expert on what I am looking for.
    Last year very first time I rented out residential property on the basis of 12 Month AST. The tenant never made up rent on time and left me in huge amount in debt upon period expiry. The property was managing by estate agent. Anyhow, 2 months prior to tenancy agreement expiry, Agent sent to tenant letter stated that agreement is not going to renewed. On the last day of agreement expiry Agent served them section 21 notice. Afterwords I submitted the claim form to get possession. To get possession ASAP I went with this option called Accelerated. (This has been suggested by agent as the other procedure will take for long and recovery of rent is not guaranteed). Few days later, I received the letter from court statied defendant has 14 days to file a defence if defence do not file, i may ask court for possession. Well after 14 days when defendant did not file the defence I submitted court to get possession order.
    Now I have received letter from court saying, The claim is struck out as the claim form disclosses no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim.
    Reason:
    The section 21 notice gave less than 2 month notice and therefore invalid.
    In accordance with Civil Procedure Rule 55.16(4) the claimant may apply to restore the claim within 28 days after service of this order (dated 12 Jan 2009). No my question is, how to apply for restore the claim and when shall I serve this? Please help.

  • #2
    Serve a correct S21 giving two months notice. If you have trouble with the English language or understanding the form, get it done by a solicitor.
    I offer no guarantee that anything I say is correct. wysiwyg

    Comment


    • #3
      I dont think you should restore the claim.

      You need to serve a valid s21 then once that has expired issue proceedings.

      agent should have served the notice 2 months ago by the sound of it!
      PAUL GIBBS, solicitor, Jacobs & Reeves. My comments on this forum are correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. No responsibility or liability is accepted by reason of reliance upon such comments. This disclaimer would not apply to direct clients of Jacobs & Reeves where there is a valid retainer in place and I would be happy to confirm any advice if formally instructed. . Jacobs & Reeves now offer a fixed fee possession service.

      Comment


      • #4
        Do I have to give another S21 now or shall I wait until for two months when the first one expired and re-submit the new claim.

        Comment


        • #5
          Possession Order - Civil Procedure Rule 55.16(4)

          Thank you very much.

          Comment


          • #6
            Just serve a new one now, but make sure it is correct in every detail.
            I offer no guarantee that anything I say is correct. wysiwyg

            Comment


            • #7
              Thanks. That means if I serve new S21 now and wait for 2 months until it get expired and then apply for eviction. So tenant will live without rent for this whole period and plus rent arrear of 4 months of actual tenancy. Is there any other way?

              Comment


              • #8
                You did not mention the 4 months arrears. Serve a S8 g8.10.11. now. You are able to take action after 2 weeks and you can apply for your arrears and costs at the same time. Make sure you get it right. Search this forum and read up about it.
                I offer no guarantee that anything I say is correct. wysiwyg

                Comment


                • #9
                  Thank you sir. I am very confused. Some solicitor said If i serve section 8 it may take long time to get possession and I will not get rent arrears if tenant do not have money to pay. The tenant was claiming housing benefit and the claim stopped 1 month before the expiry of agreement. The topup ammount which tenant had to pay were accumulated and it reached equivalant to 4 months rent arrears. The best choice solicitor suggested me to serve another Section 21 now and wait 2 months to expire and then claim. My worry is that the tenant will live for this whole period for nothing. Also tenant is willing to go but she requires court order so she can go housing to claim homeless.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Possession Order

                    Hello to all members

                    I have got the possession order from the route S21 (Accelerated Possession Order). Now I need to know what will happen? Also if there is any other way I can claim unpaid rent. I understand rent can not be claimed through the route S21 - Accelerated Possession Order. When I served S21 (i.e. during the contract time) tenant were not in 2 months rent arrears. But due to some mistake from agent the proceedding went to hearing which took 2 months. For this period no rent paid by tenant. Is there anyway to recover some or all of rent money?

                    Comment

                    Latest Activity

                    Collapse

                    • NTQ during fixed term?
                      vpltd
                      Hi,
                      Can a LL issue a valid NTQ during the six-month fixed term of an AST agreement?
                      (A residential let in England.)
                      VPL.
                      11-08-2017, 14:53 PM
                    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                      jpkeates
                      Except that the repossession order doesn't actually end the tenancy either, it simply says that it must end.
                      Then, either the tenant has to surrender the property to comply with the order or the order has to be executed by bailiifs.
                      Which actually ends the tenancy.

                      So the court...
                      22-08-2017, 12:59 PM
                    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                      StuartH
                      Which came first, the chicken, or the egg? ...
                      22-08-2017, 12:55 PM
                    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                      StuartH
                      I'm pretty unlikely to agree with anything you write, as a matter of general principle; and certainly, see no value in debating why. I wish you a good afternoon....
                      22-08-2017, 12:52 PM
                    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                      KTC
                      Let's try to construct that piece of legislation.

                      (1) & (2) can stand on its own. There's no inconsistence to prevent accepting that a tenant leaving after receiving a s21 before/without court is leaving "as a result of the service of a notice". The bit some have difficuities...
                      22-08-2017, 12:14 PM
                    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                      jpkeates
                      The legislation the says that also says that it must happen at a hearing that is impossible.

                      It has to happen at a repossession hearing when the tenancy has ended as a "result" of a s21 (and ended during a tenancy period to require a rebate).

                      The only possible scenario...
                      22-08-2017, 10:20 AM
                    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                      Wright76
                      It's perfectly simple. Either you accept the tenancy ended as a result of the section 21 or don't.

                      By taking the keys back and control of the property you are somehow accepting the surrender. Now, if you have no written notice from the tenant or deed of surrender your most definitely accepting...
                      22-08-2017, 09:59 AM
                    • S21 and refunds
                      tatemono
                      Because the poor old OP of THIS THREAD has seen it derailed by a long but nevertheless valid debate/argument/discussion about the interpretation of law, I've started a new thread because the discussion has raised some questions I'd like answers to.

                      Say I have a tenant, whose AST started...
                      18-08-2017, 05:52 AM
                    • Reply to S21 and refunds
                      tatemono
                      er... perhaps pedant would be more apropros ...
                      22-08-2017, 09:39 AM
                    • Tenants reporting damp issues in flat
                      james99
                      Hi,

                      I rent out a modern / purpose built ground floor flat which I've owned for c15 years and lived in it myself up until the last few years when I have rented it out. Never had any issues with damp when I was living there or with past tenants, however, the current tenants have reported...
                      16-08-2017, 16:53 PM
                    Working...
                    X