I did not use TDS- Court Action approaches!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mh1111
    replied
    Hi,

    Is the following thread relevant to this;

    http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums...ection+schemes

    Deposit protection on tenancy renewal?

    Jeffrey do you disagree with agemnt 46?

    cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • Poppy
    replied
    The other insurance-based scheme that mind the gap has omitted is called Tenancy Deposit Solutions Limited or TDSL or mydeposits.

    Leave a comment:


  • mind the gap
    replied
    Originally posted by shackleton9 View Post
    Thanks for the advice.
    I've never felt that the money is secure with the Tenancy Deposit Protection scheme - custodial. Ithink they payrunning costs from interest margin on the dposited money. 2.3?%. presumably if interestrates drop even further we will payTDS to keep the money!
    Regards
    Wendy
    The custodial scheme is called the DPS (Deposit Protection Scheme) and is funded, I believe, from the interest accrued on the deposits. There are two other non-custodial schemes, of which the TDS is one, where the money stays in the LL's or agent's account but is protected by an insurance paid for by the LL.

    Leave a comment:


  • shackleton9
    replied
    TDS- they can fail- will wepay them interest.

    Thanks for the advice.
    I've never felt that the money is secure with the Tenancy Deposit Protection scheme - custodial. Ithink they payrunning costs from interest margin on the dposited money. 2.3?%. presumably if interestrates drop even further we will payTDS to keep the money!
    Regards
    Wendy

    Leave a comment:


  • Preston
    replied
    Hi

    I know this argument has been raised in a slightly different context in another thread and there are different views on the point, but I do think it likely that even though s214 of the Housing Act 2004 refers to tenant that a former tenant could also take action under this legislation. On a practical level, many tenants will only find out about the failure to protect once the tenancy has ended. And the fact that a "relevant person" (i.e. someone who paid the deposit on behalf of the tenant) can also take action would suggest that there was no intention to limit the opportunity for action strictly to the period of the tenancy.

    Have just realised that I was typing this response, others have already made the same point.

    Preston

    Leave a comment:


  • mind the gap
    replied
    Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
    (Thinks)
    T has left
    so it's no longer T's only or principal home
    so it's no longer an AST
    so the deposit protection rules no longer apply.
    Yes, but...if tenants moved out and a LL still refused to give back an unprotected deposit, what redress would they have? Surely they should be able to sue for the 3x penalty on the grounds that LL did not protect during the tenancy, even if that tenancy is now ended?

    Otherwise, LLs would only ever be at risk of being sued during the tenancy - but most tenants don't realise LL has failed to comply until tenancy ends and they ask for deposit back...catch 22 situation, me thinks.

    Leave a comment:


  • jeffrey
    replied
    Originally posted by Poppy View Post
    Wickerman, do you realise that the tenants have left the property?
    (Thinks)
    T has left
    so it's no longer T's only or principal home
    so it's no longer an AST
    so the deposit protection rules no longer apply.

    Leave a comment:


  • Poppy
    replied
    Wickerman, do you realise that the tenants have left the property?

    Leave a comment:


  • mind the gap
    replied
    Originally posted by Wickerman
    I thought if you protected it after the fact you would be OK? Or does that only apply to the prescribed information?
    No, it seems in practice to apply to the act of protecting it as well. Some landlords have rushed off and done this and got away with it as long as it was in a scheme before the court date.

    However, if tenants have moved out and LL returns it immediately in full, she has more chance of avoiding court action as the whole point of protection was to ensure T's get the money back....and they will have done.

    I agree she was still guilty of non-compliance, but the fact she had given it back would count in her favour, should the tenants decide to take action. In fact, I'm not sure they can do that, once deposit has actually been returned.

    Leave a comment:


  • jeffrey
    replied
    Originally posted by mind the gap View Post
    Why exactly did you not protect their deposit in a scheme?
    Probably because of an incorrect assumption relying on the four-year-ago original AST's commencement date.

    Leave a comment:


  • mind the gap
    replied
    Originally posted by Poppy View Post
    You have failed to protect their deposit according to the law.

    Next time, you cannot issue a section 21 notice if you have taken a deposit and not protected it.

    Give them back all of their money right now. You don't have a legal leg to stand on. Cross your fingers that they don't take you to court.
    Agreed. If they take you to court, you could be made to pay up to 3 times the deposit as a penalty for failure to protect it.

    Do as Poppy says and give it back immediately.

    Leave a comment:


  • Poppy
    replied
    You have failed to protect their deposit according to the law.

    Next time, you cannot issue a section 21 notice if you have taken a deposit and not protected it.

    Give them back all of their money right now. You don't have a legal leg to stand on. Cross your fingers that they don't take you to court.

    Leave a comment:


  • mind the gap
    replied
    Originally posted by shackleton9 View Post
    Any advice for me?

    I set up an AST for my 3 bed house in London about 4 years ago. As one tenant left he/she found a replacement and so on. The new tenant gave outgoing tenant their proportion of the deposit.

    I wanted to regularise the situation earlier this year and drafted a new AST with new names -which they all signed. I advised them before signing I'd not put the money I had held for 4 years in aTDS.

    Within terms of the AST I eventually served section 21 to regain possession. On departure a pile of rubbish was left in my front garden. I arranged clearing and propose to deduct charge fromoriginal deposit.

    Tenants are threatening me with Court action for witholding this amount and for not putting deposit inthe TDS.

    Do you have any ideas how I stand on this should it come to Court?
    With thanks
    Regards
    Wendy
    Why exactly did you not protect their deposit in a scheme?

    Leave a comment:


  • shackleton9
    started a topic I did not use TDS- Court Action approaches!

    I did not use TDS- Court Action approaches!

    Any advice for me?

    I set up an AST for my 3 bed house in London about 4 years ago. As one tenant left he/she found a replacement and so on. The new tenant gave outgoing tenant their proportion of the deposit.

    I wanted to regularise the situation earlier this year and drafted a new AST with new names -which they all signed. I advised them before signing I'd not put the money I had held for 4 years in aTDS.

    Within terms of the AST I eventually served section 21 to regain possession. On departure a pile of rubbish was left in my front garden. I arranged clearing and propose to deduct charge fromoriginal deposit.

    Tenants are threatening me with Court action for witholding this amount and for not putting deposit inthe TDS.

    Do you have any ideas how I stand on this should it come to Court?
    With thanks
    Regards
    Wendy

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Reply to Choosing tenants
    by AndrewDod
    No you really really can ask for landlords references/statements etc on more than one simultaneously. Indeed you often must. Be transparent though....
    07-07-2022, 14:16 PM
  • Choosing tenants
    by annam222
    Hi all,
    I advertised my flat on OpenRent (for the first time) and received 90 viewing requests in a few days (I have removed the advert now).
    I set up an automated reply to all enquires with a list of 10 questions, then picked five potential tenants that ticked all the boxes. I called all...
    07-07-2022, 13:09 PM
  • Reply to Can I claim rent reduction due to building noise and landlord’s misrepresentation ??
    by jpkeates
    You have rights under consumer law if there were things that would have led you (or any reasonable person) to make a different purchasing decision that you were not advised of.
    It's called a misleading omission.
    The legislation that covers it is Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations...
    07-07-2022, 13:52 PM
  • Can I claim rent reduction due to building noise and landlord’s misrepresentation ??
    by A.Renter
    I started renting a ‘studio apartment’ (i.e. a bedsit) in January this year in a three-storey 1930s block – residents are a mix of renters and leaseholders. I am considering asking for rent reduction due to two main issues:
    1. Upon moving in I noticed that there is no way to turn off the radiator, as
    ...
    06-07-2022, 16:41 PM
  • Reply to Choosing tenants
    by ash72
    Based on the information, I would pick the one with the highest salary, as they will be able to afford the property and the costs of running the property. If you haven't already I would ask them why they are leaving the property they are currently renting - this provides good insight.

    And...
    07-07-2022, 13:51 PM
  • Reply to Evicted and left a few bits
    by jpkeates
    Not unless there's a right of offset in the tenancy agreement.
    There's no general right to offset in English law.

    In reality, if the landlord did sell the belongings and claim the proceeds were to recover the cost of disposal (which the bailee is entitled to do), the tenant would...
    07-07-2022, 13:45 PM
  • Evicted and left a few bits
    by betsy2040
    I been evicted today and I’ve left a few bits of stuff ,

    marble table and dining chairs , mattress 2 sofas ect ect boxes of stuff , curtains , few boxes of clothes and shoes , and sideboards and all my garden stuff

    How long have I got to remove all this?...
    06-07-2022, 18:56 PM
  • Reply to Renters reform bill
    by jpkeates
    Magna Carta doesn't apply to us common people.

    Your right to private property is in the Human Rights Act, though.
    And, ironically, our best protection is likely to be the amount of property that is owned by non-UK citizens, particularly companies.
    07-07-2022, 13:42 PM
  • Renters reform bill
    by flyingfreehold
    i have just read an interesting summary of all that is proposed in the EG (Estates Gazette). As drafted it effectively brings back a form of rent control as tenants will have the right to go to First Tier Tribunal to challenge any rent increases which must be proposed by section 13 notices.
    ...
    04-07-2022, 16:29 PM
  • Reply to Choosing tenants
    by AndrewDod
    Can't see any problem with asking for bank statements and landlord references from all of them right now. Also visit them in their current homes if possible. Don't be unfair and lead them on however - explain clearly that they are one of three possible candidates out of 90. Ask for copies of their current...
    07-07-2022, 13:42 PM
Working...
X