Tenant in rent arrears: should I serve s.21 or s.8?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tenant in rent arrears: should I serve s.21 or s.8?

    I have a tenant living in a flat who signed a 6 month AST 3rd October 2005. He actually moved in on 11th Sept 2005. This guy has cashed his first 2 rent cheques and spent them on himself. I have waited untill he became 8 weeks in arrears and applied to have his rent cheques paid directly to me,which I now get, but these payments don't cover all the rent because he is under 25 and only gets a single room allowance of £37 a week. He hasmade one payment of £50 cash to me since he has been there. He then told me that he had applied for a "Crisis Loan" from the local council, of which he said that he would pay off his arrears with. I have since been onto the council and they tell me that he does not qualify for one of these loans. My question is...can I serve him with a Section21 before the end of his AST, or is there another road I can go down to evict this guy? May I add that the area that I live in, tenants rent payments are under this new Pathfinder scheme.

  • #2
    How much total arrears is he currently in? Yes you can serve a S21 prior to the end of the tenancy, but not to EXPIRE prior to the end of the fixed term. However, depending how much arrears he is in, you may be able to serve a Section 8. In fact, even if not you may be able to serve S8 on discretionary grounds.
    Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

    Comment


    • #3
      Mr Shed you're doing it again! Please engage brain before letting out clutch!

      If the tenant moved in on 11 September then that's when the tenancy began and a monthly periodic tenancy has therefore been established from day one; you can't have a tenant signing the document (retrospectively) in October when he has been there for nearly a month!

      Also the landlord will be somewhat restricted as to the terms of the tenancy as the AST is about as useful as an ashtray on a motorcycle as far as documentary proof is concerned.

      AND, you can't serve a S.8 Ground 8 Notice without proof of a valid written tenancy agreement.

      You give far too much advice on this forum (which is incorrect)! Lawstudent would have a fit! Where is he anyway?
      The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

      Comment


      • #4
        Take a chill pill paul. Seems to me you are the one taking the fit. Yes, some of my advice is occassionally wrong, but these are corrected, and it is not malicious, I have best of intentions in giving advice, sometimes it is wrong and corrected. But most of the time I am correct, and genuinely help people. Please don't jump on your bloody high horse every time someone else isnt perfect.
        Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm not asking you to be perfect, it's just that you troll out advice without any thought of accuracy, and as it's happening a lot recently! You post much, much more than anybody else, and whilst you say you're trying to be helpful, more often than not you are making matters worse; in other words not giving the advice in the first place would be better. Good advice is fine!

          Have you noticed that the knowledgable people on this site, lawstudent, david button, tony booth, are hardly posting any threads these days (or not at all), because they must be completely exasperated sometimes at some of the dross. Might I suggest you dwell for a few minutes about what you are going to say and think it through before tapping on the keyboard to be "first" with an answer. I'm not getting on my high horse but you really need to take a step back! I don't wish you any ill will but you are a bit too "keen" for you own good! I don't post nearly as often as I used to because there is so much trivia.
          The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

          Comment


          • #6
            OK Paul fair point, and duly noted. I only wish to disagree with the word "troll". A troll posts purely not to contribute to the discussion. I always genuinely believe I am bringing valid information to a thread. However, you are right, I should not post unless I am more certain about the answer - I have had a particularly "bad week"

            Oh and I only post a lot coz I have no life when I'm in the house I am always online!!!
            Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

            Comment


            • #7
              MrShed, on the proviso that you make it clear that you are simply providing your thoughts on a matter, I think that you are doing a fine job.

              I would suggest that you avoid presenting any response as a fact and a good disclaimer should do this.

              Since joining this site it has become clear that everyone has been wrong at some point. I have been contradicted on several occassions and yet in twelve years as an agent I have never had a landlord lose a case and have ensured that none of the many agents i worked in taken to court.
              For the avoidance of doubt, I am not a solicitor nor a specialist. I have simply spent many years in the business and am expressing my opinions. I would urge caution to any individual using these forums as a sole basis for decision without first speaking to a solicitor.

              Comment


              • #8
                Ok, just to answer a few questions....the tenant owes me about £450 and the reason why he didn't sign the tenancy straight away was because I was renewing alot of my AST's at the beginning of October, so I waited until then for him to sign. If this was a mistake please tell me so. All I need to know is, how to I get rid of this tenant ASAP.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Dirty Stop out, sorry to jump on this thread but I have to say something.

                  MrShed, you go on making your posts, you have helped a great many people here and on the odd occasions when you are wrong you are corrected. I applaud you on your efforts.

                  Paul, we have had this before. You are the most knowledgeable person here, without a doubt, but I wonder how many threads will go unanswered if it were left solely to you. Once again you have forgot what a forum is. This is not a white paper on lettings, it is a place for discussion. Now I have been wrong many times here, but the board has corrected me and I have learnt so much, so please don’t try and stifle those who come here to learn and try to help. YOU have been corrected before, including by me, so don’t throw stones. As far as assuming that some of the knowledgeable regulars have not posted for a while because of people like MrShed and myself is complete tripe, people come and people go. IF you want to run your own insular forum, put one on your own website and control it yourself, otherwise leave it to Tom.

                  Ill climb off my soapbox now.

                  Dirty stop Out, Paul_F has said that a AST signed in retrospect is invalid, so yes what you have done was a mistake.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Please Please[B ]all[/B] senior members continue to post on this forum.

                    I have benfited from the advice given by several senior members, in answer to my own queries, and also in the responses given to other posters.

                    Paul_f in particular, gave me some advice that was invaluable, and contrary to that given by a solicitor, a supposed expert in Landlord/tenant law. I am very grateful to him. On the strength of information gleaned from all landlord/tenant sites that I could find, and in particular this one, I have been able to deal with a tenant/landlord problem myself, and have not yet had to resort to expensive legal means.

                    Mr Shed, you may sometimes get it wrong, I only know this because others correct you, but you are unfailingly helpful and always ready to offer a viewpoint. Don't stop posting, I have learned much from you and the discussion you prompt by your postings.

                    Some of the postings may well appear to be trivial to those who are better informed. However, when you are a tenant in trouble, or a LL who is trying to make a living while walking through a minefield of legal procedure, the voice of reason is the better informed.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Even under the LHA Pathfinder scheme, you may be able to get the LHA (Housing Benefit) paid directly to you if you let the benefit office know that your tenant is in arrears. Have a look here

                      See para. 4.10
                      At least that might help for now.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Paul_f
                        If the tenant moved in on 11 September then that's when the tenancy began and a monthly periodic tenancy has therefore been established from day one; you can't have a tenant signing the document (retrospectively) in October when he has been there for nearly a month!
                        It seems to me there isn't enough information to establish this, if the agreement is dated 11 September fair enough but if the agreement signed on the 3rd of October is dated 3rd of October then surely this would be a "surrender and re-grant", or have I misunderstood something?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Ok, it seems that I have made a mistake by allowing the tenant to sign his AST late, but can someone please tell me what I can do to get rid of this tenant.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            DSO what is the date of the AST and what are the dates next to your and the tenants signatures?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The dates of the AST is Oct '05 to April '06 and he signed it on the 3rd of Oct '05

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                                MrShed
                                I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

                                I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
                                20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
                              • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                                MrShed
                                They would both be reasonable assumptions! But incorrect I'm afraid.

                                GDPR is clear - the breach must be notified within 72 hours of it HAPPENING. Regardless of whether you even find out within that 72 hours. If you notify outside of 72 hours, whether you knew or not, its a fine. This is...
                                21-07-2017, 14:45 PM
                              • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                                jpkeates
                                Principle 8 - and probably Principle 7 (data is automatically replicated onto insecure devices).

                                Amazon allows users to control where their data is stored.
                                Apple, Microsoft, Dropbox and Google do for their business offerings but not for their personal products.

                                This sounds...
                                21-07-2017, 14:39 PM
                              • Renting a flat to a company
                                Raiden328i
                                In the small block were I live the guy below me in the shop me and my wife rent to him wants one of the flats next door which is now empty. He says he wants to stick his workers in it and I am just wondering how it works or if you can do it seeing as you have to register the deposit etc?
                                ...
                                21-07-2017, 14:02 PM
                              • Reply to Renting a flat to a company
                                MrShed
                                *** UNHELPFUL POST ALERT ***

                                I've lost track of the number of times I've seen on this forum posts like this. Why would you consider going into business with someone who you dont trust due to previous issues? Walk away.

                                To answer slightly mroe definitively, you cant have a tenancy...
                                21-07-2017, 14:19 PM
                              • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                                jjlandlord
                                The ones I have mentioned all explicitly state that they are compliant with Privacy Shield.

                                I mean, as said and repeated, if you are a cloud data provider in the EU and a minimum serious then your service complies with EU law...

                                Beyond that, they cannot check and be responsible...
                                21-07-2017, 13:54 PM
                              • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                                jpkeates
                                The only popular (used by real people routinely) cloud supplier who claims compliance is Microsoft for Office 365 storage (since 2014).
                                None of the other suppliers, as far as I can find out, claim to be compliant - although it's fudged on most of their "help" pages.

                                I am...
                                A data storage strategy is important because digital storage media are inherently unreliable and all file formats and physical storage media will ultimately become obsolete.
                                21-07-2017, 13:44 PM
                              • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                                jjlandlord
                                Read my comments again... Thank you for your contribution to the thread.



                                Privacy Shield has only been mentioned in relation to compliance with current rules.




                                As said, I'm sure providers will update their operations to comply with the GDPR,...
                                21-07-2017, 13:33 PM
                              • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                                MrShed
                                I feel that GDPR is being misunderstood here (which is common).

                                Privacy Shield is one tick box (of many) towards GDPR compliance. It allows the "transfer" of data outside of the EU jurisdiction.

                                However, it doesnt (for example) address the needs for the Data Controller...
                                21-07-2017, 13:25 PM
                              • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                                tatemono
                                backblaze is one such "serious" provider... and yet it doesn't let you choose....
                                21-07-2017, 13:15 PM
                              Working...
                              X