Housing Benefit Interim Payments

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Housing Benefit Interim Payments

    I have tenants in a property at the moment who are in receipt of housing benefit. They fell into two months arrears today & rather than serve a section 8 notice I sought some legal advice. I was told that BY LAW the council must make an interim payment if they have all the information to process a claim within 14 days. Has anyone ever come across this before & what sort of payment did you recieve?

  • #2
    In practice, the council will still be waiting for something or other and I list the common problems below:-

    1. Proof of residency by written agreement/rent book.
    2. Proof of income
    3. Verification Framework visit
    4. For Social Security claimants, the DWP to confirm benefit.
    5. Other unspecified query - claim form not completed correctly - date of birth dont match/query on income etc. etc.

    and they have to commence paying out within 14 days of obtaining all the information they require and seeing as your tenants are two months in arrear, whether it is Housing Benefit or Local Housing Allowance, they must pay to you as landlord.

    What usually happens is the when the claim is submitted, certain parts of the jigsaw are completed immediately and others follow on and it can be just one little bit that holds the whole process up.

    Best thing is to keep in touch with the council and keep notes of when you contacted them, who you spoke to and the result. They can make interim payments based on the likely amount of HB/LHA but tend not to do this often because it is the same process for this as it is to send the correct amount in the first place.

    Comment


    • #3
      My experience is that HB usually takes 10 - 12 weeks before being settled but if it goes over three months they make a decision. Last time this happened to me, the tenant received £15 per week less than she was entitled to, an appeal takes another three months! (ongoing situation).

      Comment

      Latest Activity

      Collapse

      • Claiming for protected deposit
        mandm
        This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
        Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
        I served the...
        21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
      • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
        MrShed
        JK - there are *some* upsides of taking a deposit. The main two for me:
        1) Regardless of what it can feel like on here, the majority of tenants do not know they can play the system in this way.
        2) There is something to be said for the mindset of a tenant who has something "invested"...
        21-07-2017, 08:19 AM
      • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
        MrShed
        I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

        I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
        20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
      • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
        jpkeates
        The ICO should be fining landlords for not registering as data processors - they're not.

        The maximum amount of personal data held by landlords and agents arises out of tenant referencing, and, if that were to be destroyed after a couple of months, most landlords would arguably be pretty...
        21-07-2017, 08:16 AM
      • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
        JK0
        I'm afraid this rant won't help you much o/p, but:

        STILL!? Still landlords are giving tenants a way to wheedle thousands out of them for no good reason?

        I have come to the conclusion this whole deposit protection nonsense is a government sponsored scam. There is barely any...
        21-07-2017, 08:12 AM
      • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
        jpkeates
        They are probably claiming that you didn't protect the deposit and give them the Prescribed Information document, both of which you are required to do within 30 days of receipt of the deposit.

        If you didn't do both things to the appropriate deadline, you didn't protect the deposit correctly....
        21-07-2017, 08:09 AM
      • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
        jjlandlord
        Source: http://news.pwc.ch/31824/gdpr-key-ch...-eu-companies/

        That being said, I don't think it will have much impact on landlords:



        I don't think that'll be the case. References are legitimate and widespread.



        ...
        21-07-2017, 07:51 AM
      • Help. Scam/ fraud letting
        Hayleydenice93
        Hiya

        i need some advise on my situation in regards to this flat offered to me and my partner. We viewed a flat which was in an old office block which had been converted into service apartments and then refurbished into flats.

        The agency we viewed the flats through did not want...
        20-07-2017, 20:59 PM
      • Reply to Help. Scam/ fraud letting
        theartfullodger
        You do not have to own a place to be the Landlord. Suspect they rent from owner (their Landlord), they then rent (as your Landlord) to you.

        Doubt there's any chance of getting proper tenancy from them. You could sign licence, move in, then try and get rights as an AST Tenant (eg sue for...
        21-07-2017, 07:46 AM
      • Claiming for Non protected deposit
        charliesugar
        This is posted on behalf of my cleaner who approached me for help after her last landlord failed to reply to her repeated requests for return of her deposit.
        She rented a room in a shared house in London, AST, weekly rent all paid on time. Notice given and accepted, room left neat and clean....
        27-06-2017, 13:18 PM
      Working...
      X