hypothetical situation: tenants exploiting the law?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • hypothetical situation: tenants exploiting the law?

    if tenants decided to not pay for a month and then always pay say a month behind, so they are permenantly at least a month behind in rent, is there anything you can do about it?

    I imagine you cannot serve a section 8 as they are never actually far enough behind in their payments. So basically they have achieved taking back their deposit by force.... is there any other route (legal route) available to try get them back on time?

    thanks again

  • #2
    I believe there is a discretionary Section 8 ground regarding consistently late payment. Hang on I shall try and find the thread
    Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

    Comment


    • #3
      From the desk of MrWoof:

      MrShed,

      a. Non Payment of Rent.

      For rent arrears, the landlord is relying on either one or a combination of grounds 8, 10 and 11.

      o Ground 8: that the tenant owed at least two months' rent (in the case of a monthly tenancy) both when the landlord served notice that he wanted possession and still owes two months' rent at the date of the court hearing. If the rent is payable weekly, quarterly or yearly the ground requires that there are rent arrears of eight weeks, three months and six months respectively.
      o Ground 10: that the tenant was behind with his rent when the landlord served notice that he wanted possession, and when he began court proceedings
      o Ground 11: that, even if the tenant was not behind with his rent when the landlord started possession proceedings, he has been persistently behind with his rent.

      (This is a summary - the full wording of each Ground is given in The Housing Act 1988).
      Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

      Comment


      • #4
        Don't get confused. A Section 8 Notice is one that is served to end a tenancy other than a S.21; the 17 Grounds within the Section are the ones used on which you go to court. Discretionary Grounds 10 & 11 are the ones you are looking for concerning late rent or some rent in arrears. Mandatory Ground 8 is the one where the tenant is in 2 months arrears!.
        The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

        Comment

        Latest Activity

        Collapse

        • what is current requirements for smoke alarm?
          daxu
          Hi,
          I have a one bed flat that is let out at the moment. I asked an electrician to change the fusebox to a consumer unit and asked him for a cost of changing my battery smoke alarm to a main conntected one.

          What he told me is that I need two alarms, one smoke alarm and one heat alarm...
          21-07-2017, 10:02 AM
        • Reply to what is current requirements for smoke alarm?
          jpkeates
          The electrician is quoting the wrong requirements, as per Mr Shed above.

          You need a Carbon Monoxide/Smoke detector unless there's an open fire.
          Heat detectors are a requirement in a kitchen in an HMO.

          You need to test the alarm on the first day of the tenancy and agree...
          21-07-2017, 10:37 AM
        • Claiming for protected deposit
          mandm
          This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
          Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
          I served the...
          21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
          theartfullodger
          You don't mention PI so should we assume you can't prove you served it?...
          21-07-2017, 10:35 AM
        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
          jpkeates
          I don't think the solicitor is chancing their arm or that the allegation is false.
          The tenant has identified that you didn't give them the prescribed information and the solicitor is acting on that.

          The penalty is likely to be on the low side (1 x the deposit perhaps - even though...
          21-07-2017, 10:35 AM
        • Reply to what is current requirements for smoke alarm?
          MrShed
          What a load of rubbish this sparky is spinning to you!!

          A single battery operated smoke alarm on a single floor is absolutely fine.
          21-07-2017, 10:23 AM
        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
          MrShed
          To be fair, allowing DPS to send the email is even worse, as this doesnt help you prove that they received it.

          In fairness it doesnt sound like you did in fact give them the prescribed information...
          21-07-2017, 10:18 AM
        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
          mandm
          Thanks Guys for your immediate response, i will write and will attach the confirmation email from the DPS to the solicitor.
          @AndrewDod I did not send them email, DPS did, i also asked them to post the confirmation to tenants but they said due to DPA, tenants needs to request that!
          Is there...
          21-07-2017, 10:03 AM
        • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
          MrShed
          I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

          I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
          20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
        • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
          MrShed
          Depends on the storage provider. The other problem is though that in a disaster recovery position, they usually fail this to somewhere else, out of EU - which puts you in breach
          21-07-2017, 09:50 AM
        Working...
        X