Bath has been in situ for over 20 year. T has reported leaking around the edges of a previous occasion and the (then) plumber fixed it by putting sealand around the edges. With time the sealant curle dup at the edges and the bath again began to leak. T attempted to fix it themselves by applying foam and now the plumber says it (bath will need to be replaced and is quoting £995 to new bath, bath panel etc and new taps. The agent says that the T should make a "substantial contribution" to the work. They are pointing out that the bath is 20 years old and that previous work has not been successful.
Should I ask T to pay for any of the damage and if so what would be reasonable?
Should I ask T to pay for any of the damage and if so what would be reasonable?
Comment