We have literally just relet our bungalow. The agent who handled the new let and the previous one, which only lasted a year due to the tenant having to go to a care home, asked for the initial inspection report from 10 years ago to apparently check against the new one done in May 21 . The whole place was rewired and totally upgraded. How come they didn't need the old certificate last year? New regs or inefficient?
Electric inspection issue
Collapse
X
-
The previous inspection was 10 years ago! The latest one issued after a 40k refurb and rewire in May 21. Apparently it's"company policy" now and if not supplied can hold up first rental payment from new tenant. I've supplied it now but against my better judgement as it's out of date and irrelevant. Is it me??
Comment
-
How would you supply it, if you purchased the property a couple of years ago, you wouldn't have it and they would need to check the electrics. I would imagine they just wanted to save some time and test a few and if it's all reasonable then copy the rest from the old certificate.
If you had the place re-wired in May 21, did you not get a certificate then, should last at least 5 years......
Comment
-
Originally posted by Plumbob View PostApparently it's"company policy" now and if not supplied can hold up first rental payment from new tenant.
That's not negotiable or acceptable (although it's very revealing).
They're your agent and owe you a duty to act on your behalf, not require you to send things that are none of their business.
And, no it's not you.
When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).
Comment
-
Originally posted by ash72 View PostHow would you supply it, if you purchased the property a couple of years ago, you wouldn't have it and they would need to check the electrics. I would imagine they just wanted to save some time and test a few and if it's all reasonable then copy the rest from the old certificate.
If you had the place re-wired in May 21, did you not get a certificate then, should last at least 5 years......
Comment
Latest Activity
Collapse
-
by bombataIt has become periodic. The husband who is not living there has given notice and is due to end later this month....
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
01-07-2022, 11:02 AM -
-
by bombataHi,
I have been renting a house to a couple for the past two years. Only the husband is on the tenancy agreement as the sole tenant. His wife just lived with him and does not work.
They decided to divorce- and it's messy they are not speaking to one another. The husband moved out...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
30-06-2022, 19:26 PM -
-
by DoricPixieIs the tenancy in a fixed term or has it become periodic?
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
01-07-2022, 10:40 AM -
-
by jpkeatesAnd I fully accept that we don't really agree on this.
I'm certainly not trying to change your views or criticise them in any way.
Personally, I suspect that landlords lose at ADR because most landlord claims that go to ADR are inflated.
And ADR follows the same process...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
01-07-2022, 10:04 AM -
-
by FairAppleCorrect me if I'm wrong, but it seems that allowing arbitration through the ADR requires consent from both the tenant and the landlord. Obviously the tenants are likely to prefer this when they do not agree to a given deduction.
But what prevents a landlord from making a deduction right...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
01-07-2022, 07:53 AM -
-
by boletusAs you know, I disagree. ADR judgement statistics are massively in favour of tenants....
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
01-07-2022, 09:14 AM -
-
by boletusIf there is a dispute and the landlord refuses ADR, then the onus is on the landlord to raise a court claim against the tenant. If they don't do so within a set timescale the deposit is returned to the tenant.
Under the insurance scheme terms, if a dispute is raised, the landlord has to...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
01-07-2022, 08:55 AM -
-
by FairAppleThe whole premise of my post is that a landlord would only be interested in pursuing a tenant through the courts if he is seeking damages above the value of the deposit.
Moreover, in the case of deposits under the insurance scheme, the landlord already has the money. Therefore, the tenant...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
01-07-2022, 08:13 AM -
-
by jpkeatesI think some of this is based on some odd assumptions.
Yes, a landlord (like a tenant) can decline to use ADR and, if there's no resolution to a dispute, the tenant would need to sue their landlord.
The courts don't seem to be more strict or impartial than ADR and the loser...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
01-07-2022, 08:01 AM -
Comment