Landlord obligations when buying a BTL with incumbent tenant

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Landlord obligations when buying a BTL with incumbent tenant

    Hi

    Given the changes in landlord's responsibilities in recent times I would like to understand what those responsibilities are when taking on a new BTL with an incumbent tenant.

    Should I request all the relevant info from the vendor or do I have an obligation to go through everything myself? This is in particular regard to the tenant e.g. right to rent etc?

    I have been in this situation before but things have changed so much recently

    Many thanks in advance for any advice.

    #2
    I have been in this situation before, but I'm not sure I'd do it now.

    I'd take the checklist from the government's template rental agreement and the flow chart from the Nearly Legal section 21 checker and insist on evidence that everthing that needed to be done had been done (or that the tenant signed a document agreeing that they had) before agreeing to proceed.

    The right to rent stuff should be OK as you aren't the person giving the occupant's permission to occupy, that happened prior to your involvement, it would apply with a follow up tenancy, though.
    When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
    Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

    Comment


      #3
      Take the view that if you need to evict the T, could you with the information you currently have, if you don't then these are the aspects to get from the other party.

      Comment


        #4
        Many thanks for your replies, I get the message. The onus is on me to ensure everything is as it should be. As far as is possible that is.

        Comment


          #5
          Don't trust vendor or his solicitor to tell you things - ask tenant! Vendor too likely to lie. e.g. If tenant moved in early enough not an AST, no s21, (almost) impossible to evict. Regardless of shiny new signed AST
          I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

          Comment


            #6
            This is quite a good website for someone buying a tenanted property: https://www.vestaproperty.com/blog/1...anted-property

            Comment


              #7
              Having bought, serve S3 % s48 notice(s) or could be painful.
              I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

              Comment

              Latest Activity

              Collapse

              • Reply to Annex
                by Dreamingofsea
                I think you have said above you only want a lodger. In this case with the layout described it is highly unlikely to be ruled one in a court. I think it would therefore be very unwise to issue a lodger s agreement to a tenant because say down the line you want to evict the tenant and they go to seek...
                18-09-2021, 17:14 PM
              • Annex
                by Lammas13
                I have a self contained annex, it has kitchen, shower, toilet and own entrance from the alleyway.
                when we bought our house it was already there. It was build with proper planning permission.
                How do I go about renting it out. Washing machine would have to be shares in the main house. ...
                15-09-2021, 17:44 PM
              • Reply to Annex
                by Dreamingofsea
                As said above - This is a grey area. Probably It can not be a lodger s agreement just sharing a washing machine .It could be as Artful said common tenancy a non-assured short hold (little advantage since you have to evict through a court possession order and there is no accelerated process and you...
                18-09-2021, 17:02 PM
              • Reply to Typical lifetime of carpets
                by royw
                I use cheap carpet over good underlay everywhere.
                18-09-2021, 16:57 PM
              • Typical lifetime of carpets
                by davett
                I've done some searching and I see people asserting that the typical lifetime of a carpet is between 5 and 7 years. My question is, has this been established in court or is it just general knowledge?...
                17-09-2021, 13:11 PM
              • Reply to Tenant references are a joke.
                by Moderator2
                Hooper,

                Just post a new thread, I’ll lock this one for now, then remove it when the new thread gets going.

                Just to be clear (to everyone), here are some reasons why threads with names are edited or deleted.
                1. It can (and has) lead to legal action against forum members and/or
                ...
                18-09-2021, 15:01 PM
              • Tenant references are a joke.
                by Hooper
                I made two separate requests (one direct and one through a referencing company) for a landlord / agent reference for the same tenant at the same address.

                I got two replies two days apart.

                The first said they had always paid within 7 days of the payment date and that there had...
                17-09-2021, 12:03 PM
              • Reply to Typical lifetime of carpets
                by jpkeates
                The underlay is the key.
                At home I use cheap carpet (because of pets) over good underlay.
                18-09-2021, 14:45 PM
              • Reply to Typical lifetime of carpets
                by jpucng62
                Let’s be honest, most tenants don’t look after carpets as well as a homeowner. There is no point putting a quality in a rental when you can’t be sure how it will be looked after - a burn or a coffee / wine stain will ruin a decent carpet as well as a cheap one. I go for a bleach cleanable, mid...
                18-09-2021, 14:39 PM
              • Reply to MCOL & PCOL
                by jpkeates
                There was nothing about a default in the post I was responding to.
                The post said that there had been a hearing, so if there was a default, it would have to be some kind of procedural issue.
                If you don't turn up to defend a claim, there has to have been some kind of error in notification...
                18-09-2021, 13:40 PM
              Working...
              X