If a gas certificate was not given to the new tenant at the start of the new tenancy, would it invalidate the AST ???
Voided AST ?
Collapse
X
-
I can open a shop at a location to sell something without the appropriate licence to trade in that type of goods, doesn't mean the transaction that took place where you bought something from me is not valid.
There's set out penalties for breach of the relevant law, invalidating the tenancy is not one of them.I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.
I do not answer questions through private messages which should be posted publicly on the forum.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kip22 View PostIf letting a property without a Gas Certificate to a new tenant is illegal, how can the AST be valid then, is not an invalid AST only until a gas cert is produced.
Letting a property without a gas certificate isn't illegal.
Not having a gas certificate isn't lawful, but it doesn't make the let itself illegal.
When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).
Comment
-
I understand the points made, but to labour the point.
By Law I am supposed to supply a 'How to rent' guide, EPC and Gas certificate preferably before the tenants move in date.
The agreement was signed prior to the tenancy start date and the above mentioned documents followed after they were requested 12 days later by the tenants, as that made the property theoretically unsafe during that time ie: the tenants moved in and the boiler blew up, god forbid, and guidelines were not followed, could the tenant argue that as these documents were part of the AST agreement and clearly states they should be passed to the tenant before or on the start date within the AST agreement.
The AST was unenforceable and none binding until the documents were given to the tenants
Main point is the Gas certificate was dated 12 days after the tenancy start date and no prior gas certificate given to prove a continuity of certification.
Comment
-
Asked and answered. The tenancy commenced the day the tenants moved in irrespective of the requirements to provide documents. If the government wanted to void agreements because of the lack of documents they would have legislated as such. They haven't and you cannot imply an intention to do so because there has been no such intention, this is evidenced by the penalties that do exist for not meeting statutory duties.
Comment
-
The tenant cannot use it to get out of their agreement to a tenancy of a fixed term of however long. To allow so under your logic would allow the landlord to (possibly maliciously) do the same after being at fault for it in the first place.
Each of the statutory requirements you are talking about carries with it respective statutory penalties. Not giving a copy of the GSC before occupation is a criminal offence, with a maximum sentence of an unlimited fine and up to 2 years imprisonment. Additionally (simplyfing) no s21 notice until one has been supplied. Notice that last one, parliament has specificly legislated to make it harder for landlord to evict a tenant without having given a GSC. Not only had it considered the issue specifically related to AST, they have decided by implication that the AST must be valid since otherwise the penalty cannot possibly apply.
In your hypothetical situation, the remedy to a tenant before the boiler blew up is a complaint to the HSE, council or possibly court forcing the landlord to get the gas checked. A claim for disrepair could certainly be considered after the boiler blows up. If such damages are done that the property is inhabitable, that's a claim on its own under fitness for human habitation, and also breach of contract for the landlord not supplying a place to live that the tenant has and is paying for.
Pedantically, lack of a GSC available to the tenant does not make the property unsafe. It's a lack of evidence to the tenant that the property is safe. They are not the same thing.I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.
I do not answer questions through private messages which should be posted publicly on the forum.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by kip22 View PostThe AST was unenforceable and none binding until the documents were given to the tenants
Conditional agreements are possible, although why a landlord would do that is lost on me.
However, a contractual term which allowed the landlord, simply by not doing something the law required them to do, to invalidate an agreement would almost certainly be an unfair term.
And, to take the example to it's extreme, let's imagine that the agreement was somehow invalid and void.
The tenant would still have possession of a property in change for rent or the promise of rent, so there's still be a tenancy, the only problem would be the terms would be not documented.
The landlord would still have to satisfy their legal obligations or face the appropriate sanctions.
When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).
Comment
-
This is the dilemma, as the tenants never actually physically moved in, as the Gas cert was one of many documents not offered at the start of the tenancy and the tenants lost confidence in the landlord, the property and future financial problems among other repercussions.
But the Landlord ignores these facts and is arguing the AST is still valid and trying to claim rent arrears for thousands for that reason.
Comment
-
Who knows?
If the tenant had taken possession, then the landlord have no obligation to mitigate loss on unpaid rent, and the tenant would unquestionably be liable for the entire term (or till surrender accepted).
But if the tenancy was not by deed, then without the tenant taking possession, there's no tenancy yet. A court may or may not come to a different decision on mitigation for the breach of contract without the tenancy starting.I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.
I do not answer questions through private messages which should be posted publicly on the forum.
Comment
Latest Activity
Collapse
-
by rafdelphineHi
im not sure how to give notice, we are renting this flat since March 22nd March 2018.
Normally our tenancy agreement AST become periodic tenancy (roll out) we should give 1 month notice but on our tenancy agreement is write that
“TERMINATION OF THE AGREEMENT The...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
11-04-2021, 15:19 PM -
-
by jpkeatesThe police shouldn't do anything to help the landlord (or the tenant) unless there's some kind of fight.
There's no crime or public disorder issue - it's a civil matter.-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
11-04-2021, 12:41 PM -
-
Be v grateful for advice. My tenant said she wanted to End her tenancy contract early in month 3 of 6 month contract. I said ok, I ll give deposit back let’s call it s quits. No penalties won t hold her to the rest of the 6 month contract. I then Advised a mum of a friend she could move on...
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
10-04-2021, 03:05 AM -
-
by gamesmanshipGet the tenant to sign a notice to leave on a certain day. If they don't get them to call the police show them you have someone moving in they will act in your favour for them to leave without court action. Use a person that will explain the situation to the police on arrival.
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
11-04-2021, 11:37 AM -
-
by jpkeatesThat wouldn't be valid notice at any point, it's not specific enough - saying what you intend to do isn't the same as doing it.
If you accepted it, that makes it effective, even if, strictly speaking, not valid.
You and the tenant have agreed something between you and that's all that's...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
11-04-2021, 08:57 AM -
-
by jpkeatesIt's called holding over and what happens depends on a number of things.
A tenant's notice ends the tenancy, so the tenant no longer has a right to be in the property.
Shelter confirm that they can be excluded from the property and that they can't come back in.
In practice,...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
11-04-2021, 08:54 AM -
-
Please note s3 notice , if not sorted, is fines and possible criminal conviction, sadly rarely enforced.
s48 notice (often the same, but not always..) if not sorted means no rent due. Was an s48 notice served or otherwise landlord address (not necessarily their home), any address in England...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
11-04-2021, 08:30 AM -
-
by Heidi2016Under Section 3 LLTA 1985 a new landlord has to provide their details within two months. Does this apply to new landlords who inherit a property from a deceased relative? It’s been a year since the landlord died and I want to speak to the new landlord but the agent won’t give the landlord’s details...
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
09-04-2021, 21:50 PM -
-
by landlord-man4am - no place for my friends mom to live
9pm - place sorted for friends mom to live
Housing shortage? - what housing shortage lol-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
11-04-2021, 08:26 AM -
-
by jpkeatesIt’s more than possible that the landlord hasn’t changed in that case.
There can be a huge gap between someone dying and the transfer of ownership of the property, during which time the deceased’s estate remains your landlord. I’ve no experience of the process for a licensed HMO,...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
11-04-2021, 08:21 AM -
Comment