So my delightful tenant (who convinced me a tenant find service is a really stupid idea) moved out several months ago and has just raised an MCOL against me. Amongst other things he's claiming for the cost of artificial grass he laid without permission. Is there a defence that this is a 'fixture and fitting'?
MCOL against me
Collapse
X
-
Defend the case with MCoL with the evidence you have of never agreeing, inventory, photos etc etc. Why do you think it is a fixture & fitting & why did he not take it with him??
He's at liberty to bring a case: You are at liberty to defend.
This might be of use...
https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/la...laims-hearing/I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...
-
He doesn't want it, he just wants money. He's already tried to claim for unprotected deposit through a NWNF solicitor without success. Just thanking my lucky stars he moved out voluntarily, I suspect I'd be out thousands in rent arrears if he'd stayed. Hopefully it will be thrown out because of the elapsed time but I wasn't sure if this was an additional defence.
Comment
-
Originally posted by royw View PostHe doesn't want it, he just wants money. He's already tried to claim for unprotected deposit through a NWNF solicitor without success. Just thanking my lucky stars he moved out voluntarily, I suspect I'd be out thousands in rent arrears if he'd stayed. Hopefully it will be thrown out because of the elapsed time but I wasn't sure if this was an additional defence.
Comment
-
If someone leaves something behind when they move out, the landlord becomes responsible for making reasonable efforts to return it to the tenant.
As long as you can show you have made efforts to return the tenant's items, there's no possible claim.
If you still have the items, simply offer to allow the tenant to collect them.When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).
Comment
-
If I counter claim it costs, I think £35 so not worth it. I gave the washing machine to the new tenant so I could ask for it back but would prefer not to involve her. If I give him back his artificial grass someone will have to reinstate the gravel he moved to the front garden, it can be done but it's a pain. I can't prove I offered them back as this was a conversation. I have texts arranging collection of his post but no mention of property. I'm going to sign up for mediation so could offer them back then. It also asks if I want to attend the hearing. Not much as it's an hour away but it there an advantage to going?
Comment
-
If you've given the tenant's property away, you owe them compensation.
You're not allowed to do that without their permission.
Your conversation is evidence, but it's not guaranteed that they judge will believe you over whatever the tenant asserts (although it's not easy to lie in front of a judge).
If you don't attend the court session and the tenant does, you'll lose - simple as that.When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).
Comment
-
This was a cheap one to start with, 8 years old and rusty. It saved me a trip to the tip which is where it would have gone if she didn't want it. If it was mine I'd have been embarrased to ask for money for it. Though apparently to him it still has the same value as it did when he bought it, he's claiming the purchase price.
Thanks for that though, I'll say I want to attend. Is there a legal distinction between giving away and taking to the tip then?
Comment
-
Originally posted by royw View PostIs there a legal distinction between giving away and taking to the tip then?
I'd say an 8 year old washing machine is essentially worthless.
If the tenant installed artificial grass without your agreement and left it when they moved out and can have it back, they don't really have a claim for that either.
It's hard to be sure that it's a fitting, but I don't think it is.
And if they have a right to remove it, you have a right to a counter claim for the loss to the value of the property that will be caused by its removal. If the existence of the grass means that you're happy for the gravel to have been moved, you will no longer be happy in the absence of the grass, and would require compensation for the mess left behind, which will be way beyond fair wear and tear.
When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).
Comment
Latest Activity
Collapse
-
by PerceThanks Jpkeats. All is clear now that I am stuck for the time being no matter how I twist it....
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
16-04-2021, 16:35 PM -
-
by PerceHello All
I am waiting for an eviction ban to be lifted but as time goes I lose hope that it will happen in the near future or ever. What then are our options to get our property back if the tenant never moves out ? My tenant won’t move out until bailiffs evict him. I have PO based...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
16-04-2021, 10:07 AM -
-
by forest777Thanks very much indeed for all the assistance - it's very much appreciated.
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
16-04-2021, 16:21 PM -
-
by forest777Good afternoon,
We are just about to sign a TA which appears to be a six month fixed term. We say appears but the holding deposit stipulated a 12 month tenancy with a 6 month break clause which is what we wanted.
However the TA which arrived today (one day before move in!)...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
16-04-2021, 15:10 PM -
-
Reply to Use of MCOL.jpkeates I’m not aware that our tenants engaged in any way with the possession process (and they appear unwilling to engage with the council officer who was trying to rehouse them) so I think it’s likely that our tenants would also stick their heads in the sand if we go down the MCOL route.
...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
16-04-2021, 16:18 PM -
-
Hello all.
We got a possession order (and warrant) against our tenants (England) later last year. The findings of the court were:
1) Our tenants should vacate by 8th Dec’20 ( they’re still in situ)
2) The tenants should pay the landlords costs of approx £420.
Obviously...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
16-04-2021, 15:15 PM -
-
Reply to Sink blocked for almost 3 weeksby sushiThanks for everyone's input, however, this isn't something I want to try to fix myself and I suspect it's more serious than just plunging and using a chemical unblocker.
This was confirmed by the plumber my landlord sent last week.
Still waiting for it to be fixed....-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
16-04-2021, 16:14 PM -
-
by sushiMy kitchen sink has been blocked for almost 3 weeks.
The landlord/agent has been dragging his feet getting a plumber out and when someone did come, they confirmed my suspicions that it's something more just needing to pour some unblocker down (this is why I haven't called someone out myself...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
13-04-2021, 18:06 PM -
-
by jpkeatesIn which case I'd ask for it to be resent.
It's probably OK to sign it, and it wouldn't disadvantage you in any way I can think of, but it's better to be right.
Because the tenancy has a fixed term, it just ends when the fixed term does.
So you can actually leave...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
16-04-2021, 15:50 PM -
-
Reply to Section 21 at the momentby DPT57See what happens after 31 May. That's when things are supposed to change.
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
16-04-2021, 15:46 PM -
Comment