Does Section 214(4) apply to a lodger?
Collapse
X
-
You will need to prove they were lodgers by documenting the premises as your actual address where you lived possibly using council tax documents, utility bills, bank statements, DVLA docs etc. If you did not live there then that is a different matter.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
But next time, use a formal signed agreement, suggest shorter notice period. How on earth can you prove the verbal terms that you'd agreed??
Leave a comment:
-
As long as you were living in the same property and sharing living accommodation continuously for the period of their tenure, then there was no requirement for you to protect their deposit in a scheme and provided you have good evidence of reasonable deductions from their deposit you have nothing to fear.
Leave a comment:
-
It depends what they're claiming.
If they're claiming that you had no right to keep their deposit, with the s214 issue as an "as well", they might still have a case, but have no ability to claim the penalty.
If the lack of protection is all of their claim, it's pretty much a non-starter.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm assuming that the case has not yet gone to court, but as it stands, they don't have a leg to stand on.
You are right, that section of the act does not apply to lodgers and there is no requirement to secure the deposit in one of the official schemes.
Leave a comment:
-
Does Section 214(4) apply to a lodger?
Hi folks. I had a couple living as lodgers in a spare room in my house for about 6 months. As usual, I didn't see much use in a contract for such a casual let, and we made a really simple verbal agreement. Just the monthly rent, a calendar month notice either way, and a deposit of one month rent. During their stay it became apparent that one of them had serious anger management issues, and was causing quite a lot of damage. In the end, that amounted to more than the deposit, so I didn't give them their deposit back. Eventually they brought a case to County Court, quoting Section 214(4) Housing Act 2004. I was horrified to find out that this allows the court to not only make me give them their deposit back, but up to 4 x the deposit!
I've had a quick look on the internet, but I can't find out for sure whether this act is applicable to a lodger. Anybody know?
Thanks for looking!Tags: None
Latest Activity
Collapse
-
by MdeBIf you stay there long enough, then you may not have to pay anything (if you are happy to live with it).
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
05-03-2021, 20:57 PM -
-
by A.RenterHello,
I rent a house from a landlord (generally pretty decent and helpful). I did a thorough mopping of the floor a while back, which is made up of interlocking wooden plywood slats. Unfortunately some of the water must have drained below, causing some of the slats to 'bubble' and rise...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
01-03-2021, 21:04 PM -
-
Reply to Voided AST ?by kip22Im a Landlord, and I happily rescind the AST if I had failed to supply a gas cert, EPC, How to rent guide, receipts etc before a tenancy started and after the term start date if the tenant asked due to my mistakes. And return the £4000 (deposit, Months rent and fees) and count myself lucky.
...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
05-03-2021, 20:25 PM -
-
by kip22If a gas certificate was not given to the new tenant at the start of the new tenancy, would it invalidate the AST ???
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
01-03-2021, 18:29 PM -
-
Reply to County court bailiffsjpkeates Wow; that sounds very positive, Thankyou. Just need the end of the stay on evictions, then it shouldn’t take more than a few weeks for bailiffs to act on the PO.👍...
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
05-03-2021, 19:50 PM -
-
by PerceHello All
What county court bailiffs do if they come to evict and the tenants say they are not feeling well?...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
24-02-2021, 13:42 PM -
-
Reply to Tenants claiming damaged clothingErrr surely tenant may have a disrepair claim:
- landlords are liable under one or more of the following:- section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (implied term)
- fitness for human habitation (implied term)
- express contractual term
- liability arising from the torts of
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
05-03-2021, 19:21 PM -
by trevor131067Hi
We bought a house which had an excellent surveyors report with no problems at all. The home report had number one next to all the boxes. The house was in tip top condition.
We stayed in the property from November to march without any problems.
we decided to rent out the property...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
05-03-2021, 16:05 PM -
-
Reply to Voided AST ?by KTCWho knows?
If the tenant had taken possession, then the landlord have no obligation to mitigate loss on unpaid rent, and the tenant would unquestionably be liable for the entire term (or till surrender accepted).
But if the tenancy was not by deed, then without the tenant taking...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
05-03-2021, 19:20 PM -
-
Reply to Voided AST ?So kip, are you agent, tenant housing advisor?? If agent I'd fire him.
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
05-03-2021, 19:13 PM -
Leave a comment: