legal definition or 'renewal' and 'extension'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    legal definition or 'renewal' and 'extension'

    A contract between landlord and letting agent specifies a fee is payable if the tenant's contract is 'renewed or extended'.
    When the fixed term ended, the tenants moved automatically to a SPT, and the agent is demanding a fee from the landlord.
    Does this constitute a tenancy renewal? A tenancy extension? A new tenancy? Something else?

    #2
    When discussing tenancy, and someone say the tenancy was renewed or extended, in practice it generally mean a new tenancy was agreed. Can't really extend a fixed term tenancy. When you're agreeing an extension, you're actually agreeing a new tenancy.

    A SPT is legally a new tenancy, but and everyday language, it's neither a renewal or extension. It's a new tenancy, so it's not an extension of the previous tenancy or contract. Nor can it be a renewal since a new similar fixed term wasn't agreed.

    In any event, the agent hadn't done any work. The SPT arose by virtue of law. The previous fixed term tenancy ended, the tenant remained in residence, the law say a SPT is deemed granted. What is the agent suggesting they are charging for? What work did they actually do to earn the new fee? Such a fee is highly likely to be an unfair term I would suggest.
    I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.

    I do not answer questions through private messages which should be posted publicly on the forum.

    Comment


      #3
      SPT renews every month......

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by AndrewDod View Post
        SPT renews every month......
        Does the intial SPT constitute a renewal too?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by AndrewDod View Post
          SPT renews every month......
          That's not a renewal by sensible definition....
          I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.

          I do not answer questions through private messages which should be posted publicly on the forum.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by AndrewDod View Post
            SPT renews every month......
            Under what definition of "renew"?

            It is not a new tenancy.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by MKMike View Post
              A contract between landlord and letting agent specifies a fee is payable if the tenant's contract is 'renewed or extended'.
              When the fixed term ended, the tenants moved automatically to a SPT, and the agent is demanding a fee from the landlord.
              Does this constitute a tenancy renewal? A tenancy extension? A new tenancy? Something else?
              How does your contract with the agent define "renewed" and "extended"?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by MdeB View Post

                How does your contract with the agent define "renewed" and "extended"?
                It doesn't. That's the problem. I agree with KTC "That's not a renewal by sensible definition" but I'm checking on legal definition (if any) as the agency is threatening legal acion in supporting their claim for a fee.

                My belief is that if a fixed term was 'renewed', a new fixed term would be agreed. If the existing fixed term was 'extended' it would somehow continue, perhaps as a Contractual Periodic...?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by MKMike View Post
                  if the tenant's contract is 'renewed or extended'.
                  Originally posted by MKMike View Post

                  It doesn't. That's the problem. I agree with KTC "That's not a renewal by sensible definition" but I'm checking on legal definition (if any) as the agency is threatening legal acion in supporting their claim for a fee.
                  I would say that the wording from your contract requires that the agent do some work to effect the renewal/extension of the contract. If the contract has not been changed, then I would say they have no claim on the money.

                  The threat of legal action by them suggests to me that this was a tenant-find only contract; if it were a fully-managed contract, then they would be collecting the rent and withholding their fee, meaning that you would be the one that threatened legal action over it.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by MKMike View Post
                    A contract between landlord and letting agent specifies a fee is payable if the tenant's contract is 'renewed or extended'.
                    When the fixed term ended, the tenants moved automatically to a SPT, and the agent is demanding a fee from the landlord.
                    Does this constitute a tenancy renewal? A tenancy extension? A new tenancy? Something else?
                    Does the contract define either term?? If not, stupid contract drafter!
                    I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by KTC View Post

                      That's not a renewal by sensible definition....
                      Well I was being tongue in cheek (that the OP owes the agent £3000 EVERY month). That said there was a considerable bit of jaw wagging around 2017 as to whether and how (with superstrike) the onset of SPT was a "renewal" but each subsequent month was not, and many square pegs were jammed into round holes. We have no idea how the agent defines "tenancy renewal" -- you clearly point out that an SPT is a renewal but that for the purpose of the OP it is not. So really we are not applying any consistent definitions at all based on housing law.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        This has been pretty much settled since 2010 - as part of the Foxtons case decision.

                        The OFT raised concerns about the fairness of agent's terms relating to (amongst other things) "[t]erms which provided that commission shall be paid to Foxtons on renewals, continuations and extensions of a tenancy.". And a decision was arrived at that settled the issue.

                        So while it isn't technically possible to extend a tenancy or it's hard to argue that replacing one tenancy with another actually continues it, the normal English usage is allowed, and a follow on tenancy being granted for the same property to the same tenants is covered by the expressions "renewal", "continuation" or "extension".

                        You could argue that the ruling also found that "The liability to pay the renewal commission, the circumstances in which it is payable and the amount or rate of renewal commission must be clear and ‘actively flagged’ up to consumers. The renewal commission terms should also be written in plain and intelligible language, so that the consumer can understand the nature and extent of his liabilities."

                        And that doesn't seem to be the case here.

                        But the ruling doesn't make any particular reference to SPTs, although it does cover other situations where an agent claims a fee but does no work.
                        When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                        Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                        Comment


                          #13
                          As above, just reference the Foxtons case in your reply and tell them that no fee is therefore payable. They would have to challenge it legally if they don't agree and I would be amazed if they even contemplated it.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            How does the Foxtons case help the OP if that case does not even involve a SPT?

                            Comment

                            Latest Activity

                            Collapse

                            • Reply to Finding a landlords details
                              by alice123
                              I suspect the landlord used to live there and has forgotten to change his address with the land registry , easily done.

                              Quite possible that the landlord didnt put the restrictive covenant in the tenancy agreemnet or they are just ignoring it - is there anywhere else that they could park...
                              22-01-2021, 00:12 AM
                            • Finding a landlords details
                              by dontknowwhattodo
                              We have a house where there are new tenants causing all sorts of problems and I need to contact the landlord.

                              I have checked with the local letting agents and come up with nothing.

                              I have the details from the land registry and the owner is registered to the property address!...
                              21-01-2021, 22:45 PM
                            • Reply to Finding a landlords details
                              by dontknowwhattodo
                              Have tried that. Landlord unknown to neighbours. They have seen her at the property a couple of times and that is it. I have only seen her once.

                              Not had a problem with the previous tenants....
                              21-01-2021, 23:31 PM
                            • Reply to Finding a landlords details
                              by dontknowwhattodo
                              Yes have tried the neighbours. The the tenants are breaching a restrictive covenant by parking in the road blocking access to other properties. The property is on a private road with well defined restrictions and stipulations.

                              I have tried to speak to them as have other neighbours and...
                              21-01-2021, 23:29 PM
                            • Reply to Finding a landlords details
                              by theartfullodger
                              Neighbours, local shops, postman... Social media...

                              He's either very stupid or on the fiddle or both.

                              I do not have googles.
                              21-01-2021, 22:57 PM
                            • Reply to Finding a landlords details
                              by Hudson01
                              Have you knocked on some of the neighbors and asked them ? The landlord is rather foolish if he or she has not got a different correspondence address other than the let property, there have been cases where tenants have attempted to sell the rented house !!!! As all land registry paperwork goes to the...
                              21-01-2021, 22:55 PM
                            • Reply to Are bailiffs actually carrying out evictions now?
                              by KTC
                              It needs to be a possession order originated from a s8 notice, not a s21 for someone who just happens to have more than 6 months unpaid. From another poster here, the bailiffs/HCEOs is asking for the possession order to explicitly state that the court is satisfy that the arrears is more than six months...
                              21-01-2021, 22:43 PM
                            • Are bailiffs actually carrying out evictions now?
                              by nehaven
                              Reputedly they can - but is it happening? Are tenants just claiming Covid for more time?

                              Case has gone through court, and today 21 Jan is day due to give up possession but not sign of them moving! No argument from their side - just not paying, didn't show up in court and totally non-communicative....
                              21-01-2021, 22:06 PM
                            • Reply to Trouble with step mother
                              by Hudson01
                              I can only imagine that should the court do that (which i don't think they will) then it would be on the same basis your father in law lived there, so rent would not come into it. I cannot see how she would have the same right as the father of your husband, its the family relationship that ultimately...
                              21-01-2021, 21:52 PM
                            • Trouble with step mother
                              by Jul
                              Hi my husband was given a property as a deed of gift after his mother passed away in 1991 from his father. My husband put in place through the solicitor that his father could live rent free in the property but had to pay bills and any repairs or updating. His father married later the same year. The...
                              19-01-2021, 09:53 AM
                            Working...
                            X