Post-possession enforcement against guarantor: N244 to vary judgement or new MCOL?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Post-possession enforcement against guarantor: N244 to vary judgement or new MCOL?

    Issued a section 8 against T, and got an order against tenant for arrears of about £3000. T abandoned property before bailiffs could come.

    Tenancy was guaranteed by a guarantor "G". I'm sure the guarantee agreement is valid in contract law (it's not a deed).

    When i issued the S8, I neglected to include the G as a defendant so the court order to pay the arrears is only against T.

    T clearly has no means of paying off this debt and works cash jobs as a labourer.

    I want to take action against G who is employed, and has a property that G owns.

    It seems I have two routes:
    1. Issue N244 form (cost: £250) to the court that handled the S8, asking judge to vary the money order to include G.
    2. Issue separate MCOL claim (cost: £180) against G

    Questions:
    A. Which route should I take?
    B. And are there pros/cons against either approach? I was hoping that going via route 1 would be simpler as the same court, and possibly same judge would understand the background whereas MCOL is an independent action.
    C. The contract specified interest chargeable on the debt. Can I add interest to date, to my claim now?

    thanks,
    Ash

    #2
    A court won't simply add the guarantor to an existing judgement, so MCOL is your only option.

    Unless the guarantor paid for the guarantee or you paid them, I'd suggest that it's not going to be easy to enforce if it's not a deed.

    When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
    Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

    Comment


      #3
      I don't see how you can secure a second judgement for the same debt - that would leave both being enforceable and allow you to recover double the amount.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Ted.E.Bear View Post
        I don't see how you can secure a second judgement for the same debt - that would leave both being enforceable and allow you to recover double the amount.
        An excellent point - so hung up on the guarantor thing, I missed the bigger problem!
        When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
        Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

        Comment


          #5
          Thanks for replies. It doesn't make sense that they'd be no remedy in this case!

          So if I can't have two claims, then it's best to go back to the original court then to vary the original judgement?

          If I just ask the judge (via a general N244), surely he can request a new hearing and ask both T & G to defend the claim and if I win, then issue a new court order naming both?



          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by ashirusnw View Post
            Thanks for replies. It doesn't make sense that they'd be no remedy in this case!
            When you chose to sue the tenant only, a number of potential remedies were closed off.

            You might be able to persuade the judge to reopen a closed case, but I don't think it's very likely.
            For a start, you'd have to argue that your own case (which was successful) was mistaken.
            When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
            Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

            Comment


              #7
              Court won't add the G to your claim.
              Your only choice is MCOL against the G.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by mariner View Post
                Court won't add the G to your claim.
                Your only choice is MCOL against the G.
                I'm quite comfortable taking the MCOL route but in post #3 above Ted.E.Bear claimed this would present a problem as the existing court order (a result of s8) against the T is still actionable so I'd have two actions for the same debt. Is Ted.E.Bear right that this is an issue? And if so what's the remedy?

                Comment


                  #9
                  You may have to take professional legal advice.

                  Personally, I don't think that there is a remedy,

                  You elected to sue the tenant, not the tenant and the guarantor.
                  I don't see any way of suing the guarantor now the case has been decided.
                  When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                  Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                  Comment

                  Latest Activity

                  Collapse

                  • Moving back into a property I rent out rooms in
                    by amy131
                    I moved into rented accommodation after returning to full time study and currently rent out all bedrooms in a house I own that had been my main residence. I have a residential mortgage with a consent to let. The tenants have ASTs which have gone past the fixed terms so are all rolling monthly now. One...
                    10-04-2020, 03:17 AM
                  • Reply to Coronavirus - no rent payments due to self-isolation
                    by Stew
                    As mentioned above reading between the lines the agent may have contacted after yourself and applied some pressure with threat of eviction on behalf of the landlord. This is maybe the reason for the change of attitude.

                    Some RGI companies such as direct line (I believe) are not processing...
                    09-04-2020, 23:29 PM
                  • Coronavirus - no rent payments due to self-isolation
                    by AustralianGuy
                    I have an investment property I have been renting out for five years. I use the services of a letting agent who provides a full management service. This includes vetting prospective tenants and providing a rental guarantee and eviction service if the tenants fail to pay the rent. It is expensive as...
                    08-04-2020, 19:51 PM
                  • Reply to Lodger eviction
                    by Stew
                    Hi I would check your lodger agreement, even if this was a HMO I don't believe she would be entitled to sleep on the sofa. Personally I would class this as unreasonble unless she is ill and cannot climb the stairs but you mention it's a flat.

                    Getting the other documents sent to your partners...
                    09-04-2020, 22:54 PM
                  • Lodger eviction
                    by 2Toasty
                    A lodger moved in to a spare room 2 months ago. I was going to be there 3/4 times a week. I live elsewhere. We share utility bills equally. What she didn't mention at the interview was that she is very asthmatic, convalescing from an op, and prone to chest infections. Aged 66, she is now on the very...
                    08-04-2020, 18:21 PM
                  • Reply to Lodger eviction
                    by 2Toasty
                    Hi Stew Thanks for taking the time to answer, and all the other replies.

                    Yes it is my own place. Council tax paid by me, and all utilities in my name. Other statements go to my partner's place. She is not registered at my address with banks or anything else.

                    We have a...
                    09-04-2020, 22:07 PM
                  • Reply to Changing AST from joint to single
                    by rupert206
                    Thanks for all the responses so far. Appreciated. So the tenant who is currently living at the property has asked me that she wants a new ast in sole name as she is no longer with partner.

                    Do i tell her that i need a written letter from her partner who is no longer at the property? Once...
                    09-04-2020, 21:54 PM
                  • Changing AST from joint to single
                    by rupert206
                    Hi all,

                    I had a periodic AST with my tenants in a joint name. Recently the tenant has split up with her partner and has requested a new tenancy agreement to be drawn up in a single name.

                    Is this necessary or can the existing periodic agreement continue?

                    If it is...
                    09-04-2020, 17:46 PM
                  • Reply to Lodger eviction
                    by Stew
                    Hi 2Toasty

                    So I noticed in your first post you wrote "I was going to be there 3/4 times a week", is this your own house that you bought and previously lived in full time and is the other place you stay a partners house and you have not legal ownership over it? - If this is the...
                    09-04-2020, 21:16 PM
                  • Reply to Lodger eviction
                    by hamilton
                    No good deed goes unpunished!...
                    09-04-2020, 20:44 PM
                  Working...
                  X