More than one period in break clause?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    More than one period in break clause?

    Hi all,

    I wanted to ask if it's legal to have a break clause (for both landlord and tenant) that includes more than one period. I want a clause that says they can break after 6th month but not December (for example). Is this okay?

    Many thanks.

    That would depend on the EXACT wording of all the break clauses (and rest of tenancy..). And how any judge interprets each and all those words. (I could write clauses as you describe that would v v likely fail..)

    e.g. do you mean serve the notice after the 6th month or the notice to expire after the 6th month, ditto not December??

    Best option, simply grant a 6-month initial fixed term then periodic rolling. More control for landlord, more incentive for tenant to comply with contract.

    IMHO people try to make things way way too complex.
    I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...


      The answer to your question is "yes" but you need some careful.

      Apart from the fact that there is a danger of getting the drafting wrong or serving an invalid notice, as suggested in post 2, a fixed term with both landlord and tenant having a right to break does not make a lot of sense really.


        Thank you for the reply. This is the exact wording on my old contract:

        "The Tenant can terminate the Tenancy between 5 August 2019 and 31 November 2019 by giving 1 month written notice prior to the termination date; and between 1 January 2020 to 3 August 2020 by giving 2 months written notice prior to the termination date. The Tenant may not have the termination date of the Tenancy between 1 December 2019 to 31 December 2019 but may still give written notice of 2 months for a termination date after 31 December 2019 during this period."

        Sorry if this seems verbose, at the time I did try to agree the wording with the tenant, to make things clear and to cover different eventualities. In effect, I didn't want the tenant to be moving out during December and the holiday periods as I was not in the country and it would have been difficult to find someone else as replacement.

        It was only today that I wondered about the legality of it. I personally wish tenants to stay on but do not mind if they do decide to leave either if they are not happy with the place. It was just that I wasn't in the country in December so I gave them periods either side of it if they wished to vacate.


          By the way, the date ranges above are all after the 6th month of the contract start date.


            Originally posted by freddycd15 View Post
            Thank you for the reply. This is the exact wording on my old contract: etc.
            If you want anything other than a straightforward right to break the wording is necessarily going to be verbose. Just to repeat, when it comes to legal drafting the rule of thumb is not to complicate things unnecessarily. The reason for the rule is that once you start to introduce complications you run the risk of going astray with your drafting. Unless there is a very good reason no sort of complication should be introduced into any aspect of arms length short term residential tenancies. Break clause are tricky to get right in any event.

            As to your break clause:

            1.It is possible to interpret the first sentence up to the semi-colon taken on its own as meaning that notice can be served between 5 August 2019 and 31 (!) November 2019 to expire after the end of November. Whilst the last sentence says that is not possible, you cannot rule out a judge saying that the last sentence is separated by too much text from the first sentence up to the semi-colon.

            2. "Prior to the termination date" is superfluous. Whilst it does no harm, unnecessary words can get in the way. Another rule of drafting is to use as few words as possible but not so as to risk obscurity - clarity has to be the prime objective.

            3. It requires an exact period of notice - better to say: Not less than x month's notice.

            4. There are different periods of notice according to when it is to expire and that may lead to confusion.

            5. It does not say to whom notice is to be given. I think it has to be implicit, but there may be an argument if the landlord employs an agent.

            6. Whilst probably implicit, the clause does not actually say that the notice brings the tenancy to an end.


            Latest Activity


            • Reply to Aftermath
              by jpkeates
              I think there'll be a dip in property prices post event.
              There'll be a lot of dead, grieving and damaged people and lots of businesses and jobs will be gone forever.

              Which will keep landlords in the rental business, because it won't be the best time to sell up.

              The government...
              30-03-2020, 15:41 PM
            • Aftermath
              by jase222
              I've been reading all the chat on this forum and was thinking about what it's going to be like after, will landlords be more weary of self employed tenants, have more uc or pack in all together ? Interesting times and the tenants are going to struggle even more as landlords try to doubley make sure...
              30-03-2020, 14:15 PM
            • Reply to My Lodger is not Leaving - Please help with legal advice.
              by jpkeates
              Honestly, you need proper legal advice.
              This is a huge mess and it's getting worse with everything you do.

              Legal advice only seems expensive when you compare it with nothing.
              When you compare it with the costs of getting this wrong, it'd cheap.

              If the person is...
              30-03-2020, 15:37 PM
            • My Lodger is not Leaving - Please help with legal advice.
              by kuwi

              I have rented my mother’s house out to 2 x lodgers on my mother’s behalf as she has been hospitalised due to mental medical condition. A lodger agreement was given to them as she was expected to return back in few weeks’ time. However situation had changed and she had to live out...
              27-03-2020, 18:38 PM
            • Reply to Filthy neighbors
              by Manager
              Thanks for replies. The only reason I am serious over this matter is because apart of CVD19 outbreak I might be accused of causing this mess despite I don't smoke. But there is a little obstacle in actually ascertaining as who is the real culprit because upward there are two more flats (1st & 2nd...
              30-03-2020, 15:25 PM
            • Filthy neighbors
              by Manager

              During current crisis where every enforcement/complaint department is shut so don't know what should be done. Actually I moved into a ground flat couple of months ago and don't know any of my neighbour except can only assesses them through voices and movement. I have got noisy tenants...
              29-03-2020, 18:44 PM
            • Reply to Notice expires this week tenant desperate
              by Propertygoesup
              After some thought I am considering including a one time offer with my letter and statement. I know that the tenant could potentially move into her dad's house. With the arrears statement I am thinking to make an offer " without prejudice " that if tenant vacates the property within 14 days...
              30-03-2020, 15:17 PM
            • Notice expires this week tenant desperate
              by Propertygoesup
              Had a long message from tenant who is supposed to leave this week.
              obviously has realised time is running out and hasn't found anywhere else.
              Advised her to take s21 to council and ask them.
              Basically is asking to stay another 2 weeks.
              if I proceed with court order I have to...
              02-02-2020, 14:06 PM
            • Reply to My Lodger is not Leaving - Please help with legal advice.
              by Snorkerz
              I will ask for others opinions because I am not an expert on resident landlords / lodgers, but I don't believe any of them could have been lodgers if there were 3 of them occupying all 3 bedrooms - ie, no where for a resident landlord to reside. And if they were't lodgers, they were tenants. As your...
              30-03-2020, 14:53 PM
            • Reply to Aftermath
              by JK0
              I'm weary already. ...
              30-03-2020, 14:46 PM