Are you able to write fines into a lodger contract for lost time?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by jpkeates View Post
    parking firms lose pretty much every claim someone contests properly. There's even a web site to process parking fine contests.
    "Landowners have a right to charge for and enforce parking, so pay up if you've broken the rules... The issue hit the headlines November 2015 when parking fines issued by private companies were ruled as fair and proportionate by the Supreme Court."
    Source: https://www.saga.co.uk/magazine/moto...n-private-land
    Scroll to 2/3 the way down the page to see the above quotes, or do a word search for it.

    Comment


      #32
      I see this somewhat different, i can see no real practical advantage to investigate if legally it is ok or not to charge........ these lodgers are by nature transient and as such will simply move on with no forwarding address or ways to contact them, it would be a total waste of the landladies time and effort (i.e even more than she already does), i agree with one of the first posts about picking the lodgers better, if she is not able to do this then i would be looking at a different model to pay her mortgage as lodgers may not be for her. Its something i would never consider as the tenants i have are often a pain in the backside, but at least i am not living with them !!! I would say pick better or get out of the lodger game.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by bobwilson54 View Post
        In which case, why can't the landlady do the same thing by putting signs up & and invoice for her time & losses caused by anyone who breaks the rules?
        The car parking is analysed as a contract to park a car. If the terms are clear the price cannot be challenged.

        Charging for a breach of contract is a penalty if the charge exceeds the actual loss.

        Letting is a business. Some customers are more difficult than others. You have to put up with it.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by bobwilson54 View Post
          what about losses for her time? Each rule broken might sound small but when there's a large quantity of them the time she spends rectifying the problem and warning the lodger can easily rack up.
          The landlord's time spent working on their business is paid for from the rent.
          If it isn't compensating for the time spent working on the task, increase the rent.
          When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
          Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by bobwilson54 View Post
            "Landowners have a right to charge for and enforce parking, so pay up if you've broken the rules... The issue hit the headlines November 2015 when parking fines issued by private companies were ruled as fair and proportionate by the Supreme Court."
            Source: https://www.saga.co.uk/magazine/moto...n-private-land
            Scroll to 2/3 the way down the page to see the above quotes, or do a word search for it.
            But almost no one does it properly and almost every proper challenge is successful.
            I've challenged a couple myself.

            When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
            Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by jpkeates View Post
              But almost no one does it properly and almost every proper challenge is successful.
              I've challenged a couple myself.
              Doesn't change the fact that it isn't as "illegal" as you mentioned since it was "ruled as fair and proportionate by the Supreme Court.".

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by jpkeates View Post
                The landlord's time spent working on their business is paid for from the rent.
                If it isn't compensating for the time spent working on the task, increase the rent.
                The maximum rent you can charge is dictated by area and suggesting an increase beyond that wouldn't work.

                It could be argued that the rent covers the landlord's time for repairs, finding new lodgers at the end of each contract & general maintenance, but not for almost 100% of her time to be taken up rectifying damage & problems caused by ongoing rule breaking every week & finding new lodgers every couple of weeks. A reasonable amount could be deemed included with rent, but not to deal with illegal rule breaking every day.

                Say for example a lodger starts doing drugs, sets up a brothel, or is slamming doors with excessive force 10 times a day making the apartment vibrate each time & causing damage. Neighbours start to complain, and after another lodgers starts copying this behaviour, it multiplies quickly, cracks appear in plaster around doors, seals get damaged or worse the glass of the front door cracks after it's been slammed with sheer force so many times. This kind of behaviour is unacceptable & if she has to remove them from the property for breaking the "no drugs, not to use the home as a sex business, not to slam doors or cause damage" clauses, before the end of their contract, the lost rent could be £500, damage £600, and it could cost her over 100 hours to oversee the repairs & find a replacement lodger part way through the lodgers' contract.

                Particularly things like this happens every couple of weeks with different lodgers, it can't be included in the rent because no rent would ever cover that.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by bobwilson54 View Post
                  Doesn't change the fact that it isn't as "illegal" as you mentioned since it was "ruled as fair and proportionate by the Supreme Court.".
                  But most of the schemes that issue parking tickets aren't legal.
                  There are rules that they have to follow to create the contract that they're invoicing for and most don't.
                  I used to supply data to them, for which I feel some guilt!

                  The supreme court decision was about whether a charge of £85 was justified for overstaying in a car park by 56 minutes (which was an odd choice of defence).
                  It was the £85 that the court decided was fair and proportional, not parking invoices generally.

                  When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                  Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by bobwilson54 View Post

                    The maximum rent you can charge is dictated by area and suggesting an increase beyond that wouldn't work.

                    It could be argued that the rent covers the landlord's time for repairs, finding new lodgers at the end of each contract & general maintenance, but not for almost 100% of her time to be taken up rectifying damage & problems caused by ongoing rule breaking every week & finding new lodgers every couple of weeks. A reasonable amount could be deemed included with rent, but not to deal with illegal rule breaking every day.

                    Say for example a lodger starts doing drugs, sets up a brothel, or is slamming doors with excessive force 10 times a day making the apartment vibrate each time & causing damage. Neighbours start to complain, and after another lodgers starts copying this behaviour, it multiplies quickly, cracks appear in plaster around doors, seals get damaged or worse the glass of the front door cracks after it's been slammed with sheer force so many times. This kind of behaviour is unacceptable & if she has to remove them from the property for breaking the "no drugs, not to use the home as a sex business, not to slam doors or cause damage" clauses, before the end of their contract, the lost rent could be £500, damage £600, and it could cost her over 100 hours to oversee the repairs & find a replacement lodger part way through the lodgers' contract.

                    Particularly things like this happens every couple of weeks with different lodgers, it can't be included in the rent because no rent would ever cover that.
                    You evict such lodgers for breaching the terms of their licence.
                    If there is a loss beyond fair wear and tear, the landlord can recover it from the lodger.

                    You can't charge for your time beyond the rent.
                    You can't charge for replacing a tenant that you have chosen to evict.

                    If your friend can't run their business and make money for the rent they charge, they need to improve their lodger selection or change business.

                    And, being realistic, a lodger can't set up a brothel, it would need more than one of them.

                    When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                    Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by jpkeates View Post
                      The supreme court decision was about whether a charge of £85 was justified for overstaying in a car park by 56 minutes (which was an odd choice of defence).
                      The point is that a private company fined an individual & it was accepted in court, so why can't the same thing be done in by a private landlord?

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Originally posted by jpkeates View Post
                        If your friend can't run their business and make money for the rent they charge, they need to improve their lodger selection or change business.
                        Not all home owners become landlords by choice, can improve lodger selection beyond what's available or change business. There are many legitimate reasons why a landlady could be forced into having lodgers. Health issues, salary drop, loss of her job, negative equity, inability to sell due to being in an area unpopular among buyers, savings stolen... I'm sure if you're creative enough you can think of others. Just because you chose to be a landlord as a business decision doesn't mean everyone was so lucky. Some people are forced into it to make ends meet.

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Does the LL ask in her tenancy agreement for an address for correspondence in an emergency and for at the end of the tenancy (where the T can be contacted if they 'forget' to leave a forwarding address)? She could then sue for damages, if she can prove it was that T that did the damage.

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by bobwilson54 View Post
                            The point is that a private company fined an individual & it was accepted in court, so why can't the same thing be done in by a private landlord?
                            No they didn't fine anyone.
                            They invoiced them for a service that the court decided that the driver had agreed to by parking in a car park.
                            When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                            Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by bobwilson54 View Post
                              Just because you chose to be a landlord as a business decision doesn't mean everyone was so lucky. Some people are forced into it to make ends meet.
                              That's a fair point.
                              But, it doesn't change the answer to the original question.
                              No, you can't put penalty clauses into an lodgers agreement or charge for admin time.
                              When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                              Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Originally posted by jpkeates View Post
                                They invoiced them for a service that the court decided that the driver had agreed to by parking in a car park.
                                So why can't a landlord invoice them for a service that the court decided a lodger had agreed to pay by breaking the rules?

                                Comment

                                Latest Activity

                                Collapse

                                • Reply to Washing Machine/Rent arrears
                                  by jpkeates
                                  Revisit the repayment plan.

                                  You know you owe the money, but, right now, can't pay what you thought you could.
                                  That's fair enough.

                                  Offer the agent/landlord a revised plan based on your new circumstances....
                                  08-04-2020, 08:39 AM
                                • Washing Machine/Rent arrears
                                  by Washingmachine44
                                  Hi Everyone,

                                  I'm a former tenant of a property and I'm looking for some advice. I rented a property in London for 7 years with my GF and moved out in February of this year. I still owe 2 months rent arrears and this is being paid of in agreed installments through the estate agent. ...
                                  07-04-2020, 17:54 PM
                                • Reply to Properties for sale AND Let?
                                  by theartfullodger
                                  If tenanted and then sold, the sale does not end the tenancy nor require tenant to leave.

                                  New owner becomes new landlord, even if outside with removals van and screaming kids. Normal eviction processes apply .
                                  08-04-2020, 07:47 AM
                                • Properties for sale AND Let?
                                  by Questioningtenant
                                  HI! Apologies if this is a stupid question; I am rather ignorant in terms of a property being offered for sale and for let at the same time.

                                  I'm a tenant currently looking for a larger rental property and I've noticed a trend in my area in recent times to place a property both for sale...
                                  07-04-2020, 21:27 PM
                                • Reply to Washing Machine/Rent arrears
                                  by boletus
                                  You have to look at yourself in the mirror every morning?
                                  Karma?


                                  Or on a practical level;

                                  The stress finishes off the landlord. The grandson then takes over the estate and is not such a good man. He is very upset at the tenant's low behaviour after the old man
                                  ...
                                  08-04-2020, 07:27 AM
                                • Reply to Washing Machine/Rent arrears
                                  by boletus
                                  I have low quality machines still going strong more than 20 years old. I've also replaced one that was 2 years and 2 months old (I remember looking up the just out of date warranty- bearings had gone)

                                  https://www.tenancydepositscheme.com...sing-items.pdf

                                  It is reasonable to...
                                  08-04-2020, 06:59 AM
                                • Reply to Properties for sale AND Let?
                                  by BTL investor
                                  Only reason I can think of is that whilst the property is untenanted the owner puts it up for rent but also puts it up for sale at a high price just in case a buyer willing to pay the high price comes along.
                                  07-04-2020, 23:31 PM
                                • Reply to Restrictions on rental agent
                                  by Mike_H
                                  Here in Aus, agents are allowed to do individual viewings, auctions are going ahead (albeit online) and you still see removal vans moving people in and out of places etc Sounds like we're a little less restricted than the UK at the moment.

                                  Hopefully we get over all this sooner rather than...
                                  07-04-2020, 23:28 PM
                                • Restrictions on rental agent
                                  by Mike_H
                                  I'm currently living abroad so am not up on the restrictions currently in place in the UK.

                                  The tenant in my house (in the UK) is leaving at the end of the month. My rental agent has advertised the property and has had plenty of interest, but is telling me that there is nothing they can...
                                  07-04-2020, 21:28 PM
                                • Reply to Restrictions on rental agent
                                  by Questioningtenant
                                  Some letting agents are offering 'virtual viewings' although in my area, these seem few and far between. I have also send a couple of properties switch to 'Let Agreed' in the past couple of days and many agents are processing everything digitally - I think it depends largely on the agent in terms of...
                                  07-04-2020, 22:17 PM
                                Working...
                                X