Need possession advice please

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Need possession advice please

    My tenants are in arrears with their rent (always just not quite 2 full months) and I am in the process of trying to get possession of the property back.

    The AST is due to finish at the end of this month.

    The rent is partly paid by the DSS and they are meant to top it up to the full amount - but they have been out of work and unable to pay anything other than the DSS money since November.

    I took a deposit from them at the beginning of the tenancy, which I deposited in a bank account and have not touched the money since. (I have proof of this). At the time I didnt fully understand the implications of the tenancy deposit scheme and thought that as long as I had proof that I hadnt touched the money it would be ok.

    The tenant may come to some mutual agreement to pay back the arrears without me persuing it via the court, but I think that it may be difficult for them to get council accommodation unless I actually present them with a court eviction notice - is this true and if so how do I do this without ruining the relationship, which is at present good but tentative..!

    Also which route is the best to take - 21 or 8, as I now know that the deposit may affect the proceedings..?

    Any suggestions or advice please.

  • #2
    I suggest you read through sections 213 - 215 of the Housing Act 2004. Here's the link

    You need to comply with the protecting and notifying parts in order that you may use a section 21 notice.

    You could try and use grounds 8, 10 and 11. These may or may not be successful depending on the level of arrears for 8 and the level of arrears and a number of other factors for 10 and 11.

    Unfortunately some Local Authorities advise tenants they are not 'homeless' in respect to the Housing Act 1996 Part VII until they are evicted by the Court Bailiff.


    • #3
      I've been in a similar situation, though not as bad as yours. My dealings with the Housing Office about rehousing my tenants were annoying to say the least. The top and bottom of it is that legally they don't have to rehouse your tenants until you have gone through the eviction process and your tenants have actually recieved the bailiffs notice.
      The Housing Office promised me that if I didn't take the legal action for posession, they would house them quicker - they were lying and just saying this to buy more time for them.
      I wouldn't waste anymore time. Commence proceedings and get them out.


      • #4
        Seems like Im stuck between a rock and a hard place.....
        I cant use S21 because I didnt register the deposit in a scheme, and I may not be successful with a S8 because the level of arrears is never quite 2 full months (Due to the intervals at which the DSS pays the rent).

        Ive calculated that by the end of May I will be in a Break-even situation, whereby the deposit they gave me will be exactly the amount of the expected arrears.

        It seems the easiest and cheapest option may be to give them a completely new AST, register the deposit in the scheme and then in 4 months time I should be able to give a valid S21 to get possession at the end of the 6 months......??
        It would seem an ironic way of having to go about it but it looks like the cheapest and most guaranteed way to get possession without a legal fight...! Any other suggestions welcome....?


        • #5
          Why not start s.8 procedure and see if Court grants- in its discretion- the desired Possession Order?
          JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
          1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
          2. Telephone advice: see
          3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
          4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).


          Latest Activity


          • if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
            Our 6 month short term assured tenancy agreement ended on the 2nd August. We are with a reputable agency. We were invited to renew for a further 6 months back in July and were asked to email our confirmation that we wish to renew in writing. This I did. We were sent the renewal tenancy to sign. We have...
            22-08-2017, 14:00 PM
          • Reply to if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
            I would say your original AST continues as SPT.
            If now a new verbal AST, you may have a new fixed term and you cannot serve NTQ during fixed term (6 months?).
            Talk to LL directly, rather than LA.
            Why did you agree to a new AST, rather than request rolling over to SPT....
            23-08-2017, 00:30 AM
          • 6 year deposit claim
            Hi guys, I know that a tenant can claim a penalty on an unprotected deposit but I just wondered when the 6 year clock starts ticking.
            22-08-2017, 16:43 PM
          • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
            As memory fades over time, can someone provide a 'sticky' for dates when key elements of LL&T Legislation changed? I believe Apr 2012 predates later deposit timescales.
            23-08-2017, 00:08 AM
          • NTQ during fixed term?
            Can a LL issue a valid NTQ during the six-month fixed term of an AST agreement?
            (A residential let in England.)
            11-08-2017, 14:53 PM
          • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
            It's worth noting that guidance is under part 4 where tenant obviously is given notice to end of a period and therefore apportionment would not be applicable.

            The reference to the notice to quit ending the tenancy on the notice date does not change the fact that it obviously does however,...
            22-08-2017, 23:24 PM
          • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
            I think thats exactly what the section I have just quoted confirms.

            And thereafter, if you choose not to accept they are leaving as a result of the section 21 you must insist on a notice to quit or await a court ordering possession (where you will be ordered to apportion anyway)
            22-08-2017, 23:13 PM
          • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
            A lot of energy has been expended in this debate. It has been suggested a LL has no need to take Court action if T apparently vacates after receiving a s21 but with no Notice. LL cannot safely assume has vacated without Court confirmation, to avoid a T allegation of 'illegal eviction'. Equally I would...
            22-08-2017, 23:00 PM
          • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
            If someone could copy and paste section 21 (4) a and b (I'm really not technical!), the law seems to recognise that a tenancy CAN end as a result of a section 21 and before a possession hearing.

            21(4)b........the tenancy could be brought to an end by notice to quit given by the landlord...
            22-08-2017, 22:38 PM
          • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
            Assuming that the money originally paid had been used as a deposit for the single tenant tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days from when the 2012 tenancy started. And... if that was a fixed term tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days for any subseqent renwal and likewise from when it went periodic.
            22-08-2017, 22:22 PM