Agent holding rent paid in advance

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Agent holding rent paid in advance

    Not a big issue but before I talk with my agent further Id just like to get some feedback if possible from the collective here. For reasons not worth going into, my new tenant is going to pay for 12 months rent up front. I asked my agent if there was a choice as to whether they or I could hold this balance and they didn't answer directly but said it was best if they hold it. At then end of the day if they do it's no big deal but I just wondered that if I insisted I wanted to hold it then would I have any wood to stand on so to speak?

    Many thanks

    Why on earth would you let the agent hold it? Let them deduct whatever % of management fee from it, and pay it over immediately.

    If your agent fold in that 12 months, your tenant isn't going to be paying you rent again as they've already paid it.
    I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.

    I do not answer questions through private messages which should be posted publicly on the forum.


      Of course you hold it. It is your money and the agent is not an escrow service. If they go bankrupt you are down the creek.


        Agree with the above. From experience I find it prudent to consider what would happen if a company becomes insolvent.

        Bear in mind though that if all rent has been paid to you (and assuming that the agent is managing the property for the forseeable) there will be nothing to deduct expenses from. Either you will need to settle any bills yourself, or reimburse agent for them, or you could leave a small balance with them for this purpose.
        There is a fine line between irony and stupidity. If I say something absurd please assume that I am being facetious.


          If the tenant is going to pay 12 months up front you need to be careful how the tenancy agreement is worded to avoid (a) a yearly tenancy arising when the fixed term ends (b) any money paid being deemed to be a despoit which needs protecting.


            Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
            to avoid (a) a yearly tenancy arising when the fixed term ends
            Are there any negative consequences for a LL of having a spt with a period of a year?

            There used to be before it was ruled that S21(1) can be used to end a spt at any time.


              Originally posted by MdeB View Post

              Are there any negative consequences for a LL of having a spt with a period of a year?

              There used to be before it was ruled that S21(1) can be used to end a spt at any time.
              I confess that decision puzzled me. The downside is that the tenancy may cease to be an assured tenancy (and therefore an assured shorthold tenancy) for example if the property ceases to be the tenant's main residence. If the tenancy is not an AST obviously section 21 cannot be used and you have to give notice to quit. Absent any agreement to the contrary, a yearly tenancy can only be terminated on an anniversary of its start date and by giving not less than half a year's notice.


              Latest Activity


              • Reply to arrears and damage
                by Hudson01
                I applaud you on your forward thinking in regards '' tailing '' them, very smart. I agree with the above comments, i feel for the new landlord...... and in my opinion if you had, had the opportunity to evict them and their two children it is not you who is responsible but the adult who has decided not...
                11-07-2020, 18:16 PM
              • arrears and damage
                by Dougie99
                Hi, I have recently had 2 tenants leave Mother and daughter and 2 kids. They had been in arrears since Feb and left owing £2130.

                I had £1040 deposit signed to me and they signed an agreement to pay arrears over 12 months, they moved out a day before they said they were going to and moved...
                11-07-2020, 08:10 AM
              • Reply to Rent Guarantee Insurance
                by AndrewDod
                I guess the only point ever to insure is if

                a) You think they have calculated a too-low premiums based on the (correct) information you gave (extremely rare) so that you will statistically "win"

                b) If the event (if it occurs) will be life changing. Like medical travel...
                11-07-2020, 18:14 PM
              • Rent Guarantee Insurance
                by oi2004as

                I would be interested in your view on the following

                I received a renewal Legal & Rent Guarantee Insurance documents from Rentguard (which initiallyy I purchased through Openrent)

                There is the following condition in their 'statement of fact':
                11-07-2020, 11:59 AM
              • Reply to Rent Guarantee Insurance
                by Section20z
                Insurance can never pay out more than it takes in premiums so you're on a hiding to nothing. The only way you'll ever win on insurance is if you have below average luck, but in that case you'd probably also find you'd forgotten to pay the premium 🤔
                11-07-2020, 18:04 PM
              • Reply to Rent Guarantee Insurance
                by AndrewDod
                Yes, RG insurance is pretty much a waste of time. And this is a ludicrous clause at so many levels. I'd drop the policy....
                11-07-2020, 17:56 PM
              • Reply to Break Clause in AST - Recommendations Please
                by AndrewDod
                I think closer to 10 to 14 months in many places - pre virus. 4 months almost never happens anywhere with a tenant who resists in any way. In that time they can basically steal £15K.

                This average of 4 months will include the 90%+ of tenants who leave voluntarily having been served no...
                11-07-2020, 17:52 PM
              • Break Clause in AST - Recommendations Please
                by landlord-man
                I wish to add a Break Clause into our ASTs - actually, I'd like to put two in there if possible................


                To allow either the Tenant or the Landlord to exit the Tenancy after 4 months.


                To allow the Tenant (not the Landlord) to exit...
                11-07-2020, 15:54 PM
              • Reply to Break Clause in AST - Recommendations Please
                by KTC
                Well yeah, but whether it's wise, and whether it has the effect you intended are different questions.

                A landlord cannot legally evict their tenant except through the courts obtaining an order for possesion and then having that order executed by bailiffs or High Court enforcement officers....
                11-07-2020, 16:56 PM
              • Reply to Break Clause in AST - Recommendations Please
                by theartfullodger
                General advice is to avoid break clauses as they are notorius for being difficult to get valid (only way to find out if they are valid would be in court if tenant and/or landlord sues the other one).

                First doesn;t need a break clause: Simply make initial fixed term of AST only 4 months:...
                11-07-2020, 16:47 PM