Problem with Prescribed information and Section 21.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • JK0
    replied
    Oh, well it was effectively 'find only'. Landlords need to make sure they acquire all documents from agents at the start in cases like that. They also need some sort of statement about when things were served.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stef Cooke
    replied
    Originally posted by DPT57 View Post

    If your Agent is wilfully destroying documents for a live tenancy then I wouldn't be tempted to use them again if I were you.
    That was what jumped out at me, too! That seems ridiculously cavalier, leaves them open to all sorts of issues, as OP is now finding out.

    Leave a comment:


  • DPT57
    replied
    Originally posted by MiniCooper View Post
    The Lettings Agency do not have a copy as it is 7 years ago and do not keep records for this long.
    If your Agent is wilfully destroying documents for a live tenancy then I wouldn't be tempted to use them again if I were you.

    Leave a comment:


  • tatemono
    replied
    yes that would be the case even if you were still using a letting agent. The agent registers the deposit on behalf of the LL and in the LL's name, not the agent's.

    Leave a comment:


  • MiniCooper
    replied
    tatemono

    Thank you for your post. I didn't issue Prescribed Information when the Deposit was transferred into our name in January 2013. I realise now that this was an error. I hope that as it is now six and a half years ago, the tenant can't pursue me for compensation with regard to this omission

    When I login to the Deposit Protection Service website, I am registered as having received the deposit in March 2012. The involvement of the Lettings Agent who originally lodged the tenant's deposit with the DPS is not referred to.Not sure if this is what usually happens when the tenant's deposit is transferred from one name to another or not?

    Leave a comment:


  • tatemono
    replied
    In Jan 2013, the deposit was transferred into your name from the letting agency. At that point, you were required to reissue the PI to the tenants because details of the deposit changed at that point. Therefore, it isn't the letting agency that you need to be chasing for that. Their responsibility ended when you received the deposit.

    If the deposit has remained in a scheme all this time, you will be able to issue the PI now to make your section 21 valid. Simply compile the necessary paperwork from the deposit scheme's website.

    If you did not issue PI in Jan 2013, then although you as deposit holder were liable for a penalty, I believe the 6 year window will just have expired for the tenant to claim as the timer starts when you receive it. I believe you will be in the clear for this now, but others can clarify.

    Leave a comment:


  • MiniCooper
    replied
    JK0 I am not particularly worried about the penalties if she says Prescribed Information not given. As it is 7 and a Half years ago, I think that she has missed the six year window of opportunity to claim. Of course, she wouldn't have thought to make a claim as the Prescribed Information was actually given to her by the Lettings Agent. It's just that I don't have a copy and therefore have no proof of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • MiniCooper
    replied
    Thank you both JK0 and JPkeates for your good advice.

    Leave a comment:


  • jpkeates
    replied
    If you want to sell the property, the most sensible thing is, before serving notice, talk to the tenant.
    Explain what you're doing and try and work out a sensible time scale together.

    The problem with serving notice for a tenant is that the required notice of two months puts a deadline on the tenant, which isn't usually intended.
    2 months isn't long to find somewhere new to live, get approved and move in.
    Given a longer period, most of the problems with notice just don't arise.

    Leave a comment:


  • JK0
    replied
    Fair enough. Just beware of giving tenant a hint that you did not do things by the book. (I'm sure you know about the penalties for not supplying the PI on time.)

    Leave a comment:


  • MiniCooper
    replied
    Thank you both for your advice. I may just refund the deposit before serving Section 21 as suggested. I don't think tenant will be keen to move out, so may contest eviction. Probably not worth risking S21 being thrown out if she disputes she received Prescribed information and I can't prove that she had it.

    Leave a comment:


  • JK0
    replied
    The N5B doesn't ask for a copy of the PI. It just asks on what date you served it. There's not a problem unless someone makes it one.

    Leave a comment:


  • jpkeates
    replied
    You can issue the prescribed information now.

    If the tenant's mother paid the deposit, the agent should have given her the Prescribed Information as well.
    It's quite possible they didn't.

    You could eliminate any issue by returning the deposit to the tenant (and this would help them find somewhere else).

    The issue will only arise if the tenant doesn't want to move out and defends the notice in court.
    Which should only arise as a last resort, unless you're in a huge rush to sell.

    Leave a comment:


  • Problem with Prescribed information and Section 21.

    Basic History:

    Property in England. Tenant moved in March 2012. 6 month AST signed. Property managed by Lettings Agency who issued Gas Certificate, EPC. Deposit lodged with DPS within the required 30 day time period and Prescribed information re Deposit given to tenant.

    October 2012, Lettings Agent got tenant to sign another 12 month AST (to end October 2013).
    January 2013, we started managing property ourselves We notified DPS of this and they transferred deposit into our name on their website
    October 2013: AST finished and tenant has lived there ever since, on Statutory Periodic Rolling basis.

    We now wish to issue tenant with Section 21 as would like property back to sell it. We have copies of the Gas Certificates and EPC given to tenant when tenancy started (supplied by Lettings Agency at start of tenancy in 2012). We also have copies of all Gas Certificates done annually since start of tenancy. I can download a copy of the Certificate from DPS that was issued to the tenant.

    What I don't have however, is the copy of the Prescribed Information the Lettings Agency gave the tenant when they took her deposit and placed it with DPS. The Lettings Agency do not have a copy as it is 7 years ago and do not keep records for this long.

    As I can't prove that Prescribed information with regard to the deposit was given to tenant, does this mean I can't issue Section 21?

    Can I just issue another Prescribed Information now prior to issuing Section 21? I believe that the tenant's mother paid the original deposit, so would I have to send the Mother Prescribed Information re deposit as well?

    Any advice appreciated.

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Reply to I'm fuming!
    by Berlingogirl
    It's a 6 months AST. They've only been in 10 days. They couldn't work the electric shower - it's a Triton and easy to use. I think they'd been turning the temperature dial up and down without giving the water time to run through the hose.They couldn't get hot water from the bath tap. I had to show them...
    27-02-2020, 08:36 AM
  • I'm fuming!
    by Berlingogirl
    Just got to vent here!

    I've just got a text from the tenant to say that the (newly decorated and cleaned house) took him a week to clean to a reasonable standard and can I refund him a week's rent!

    That house is spotless!

    They only got the tenancy 10 days ago....
    27-02-2020, 07:34 AM
  • Reply to I'm fuming!
    by JK0
    When anyone tries that on with me BG, I point out that the place is exactly as they saw it (and accepted) at the viewing.

    I'm sure you didn't show it in a dirty state, did you?
    27-02-2020, 08:35 AM
  • Reply to I'm fuming!
    by Berlingogirl
    She said she's OCD ...
    27-02-2020, 08:32 AM
  • Reply to Returning Tenants deposit
    by Interlaken
    There is a lot of difference between taking a lodger into your own home (on a lodger agreement) and giving a 12 month tenancy (AST) on a flat or house where you do not reside.

    I think you should read up on the 2. They don't mix and match.
    27-02-2020, 08:27 AM
  • Returning Tenants deposit
    by daisydee
    Hi, This is my first time posting so forgive any mistakes I make!

    Our lodger signed a lodger agreement when he moved in 6 months ago. The contract clearly states that the 'tenancy' is for the duration of 12 months and that only us (the landlords) can terminate the agreement by giving him...
    27-02-2020, 02:01 AM
  • Reply to I'm fuming!
    by Interlaken
    Mmmm I see trouble ahead too. Nit picking type who will want constant attention and money refunds. They are a breed apart.

    Hope he is a lodger and not on an AST.
    27-02-2020, 08:23 AM
  • Reply to I'm fuming!
    by Mrs Mug
    Maybe he's OCD. And at the end of the tenancy, you'll get back the cleanest house you've ever seen.
    27-02-2020, 07:43 AM
  • Reply to Capital Gains Tax Change April 2020
    by jpucng62
    This has been in the news for sometime so should not really come as a shock. It is our duty as LLs to remain abreast of the changes in law so make sure you read articles on sites such as this, regularly, to keep up to date.

    If you missed this piece of legislation are you aware of the changes...
    27-02-2020, 07:22 AM
  • Capital Gains Tax Change April 2020
    by TREK
    As from April 6th 2020 any capital gains tax due on property sales has to be paid within 30 days of the sale of the property, only found this out yesterday on the news section on landlord zone.
    26-02-2020, 18:47 PM
Working...
X