Proving viewers saw EPC

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • JK0
    replied
    I wouldn't want to be in court trying to get an eviction, with my tenant pointing out the act I quoted to the judge though.

    Leave a comment:


  • jpkeates
    replied
    Originally posted by KTC View Post
    It's the current accepted view with housing lawyers etc.
    Right up until a new Superstrike makes us all look like idiots and renders government efforts to end s21 redundant.

    Leave a comment:


  • jpkeates
    replied
    Originally posted by leaseholder64 View Post
    Trading Standards can impose civil penalties based on failing to provide on time, even though the section 21 may not be blocked.
    Trading standards won't do that in practice.

    It costs so much for a local authority (or associated organisation) to commence legal action that they only do so after a huge internal approval process and for serious cases only.
    It might be an "add on" charge for some more serious offender.

    It's a serious problem with all aspects of local authority enforcement.
    Central government cuts mean that the local authorities simply can't afford to enforce the regulations they're meant to.

    Leave a comment:


  • leaseholder64
    replied
    Trading Standards can impose civil penalties based on failing to provide on time, even though the section 21 may not be blocked.

    Leave a comment:


  • KTC
    replied
    Originally posted by JK0 View Post
    That act goes on to say:
    The Assured Shorthold Tenancy Notices and Prescribed Requirements (England) Regulations 2015 only cares about reg. 6(5), i.e. just the bit I quoted, hence my question whether your concern is limited to s21, or the EPC regs in general.

    Originally posted by jpkeates View Post
    That's an optimistic view.
    It's the current accepted view with housing lawyers etc.

    If you don't want to risk that changing, including a copy with the contract etc. should be sufficient. I've seen tenancy agreement paperwork (which the tenant is required to signed) that explicitly state that a copy of the EPC have been given.

    Leave a comment:


  • jpkeates
    replied
    Originally posted by KTC View Post
    You don't need to show that it was seen by viewing, or even given before tenancy. No valid s21 penalty only applies if it still haven't be given by the time of s21.
    That's an optimistic view.

    A less optimistic reading would be that "the person who ultimately becomes the buyer or tenant" can't be validly given the certificate once they are the buyer or the tenant. Because by then that person can't "become" a tenant, they already are one.

    And that's consistent with the intention of the legislation, to make energy efficiency part of the buying decision making process.

    Leave a comment:


  • sam_cat
    replied
    I include a copy in the itemised pack (contract, PI, inventory etc etc) that both parties sign. I have a copy with their signature on and the 'contents and confirmation of receipt' document that we both signed and dated before move in.

    Looking back we included it on the photos for the advert, and a link to the EPC in the text.

    Leave a comment:


  • jpkeates
    replied
    Include it with the other pictures (if you can).

    I also include a copy with the deposit PI.

    Leave a comment:


  • JK0
    replied
    Thanks JPK. When you say include it, do you mean a link, or just the little rainbow diagram that appears on Rightmove listings? (Frankly I don't think Rightmove are compliant.)

    Leave a comment:


  • jpkeates
    replied
    Include it in any online adverts for the property.

    Leave a comment:


  • JK0
    replied
    What risk am I mitigating?

    The risk that the requirement for it becomes another reason for refusing a s21, (similar to gas certificates.)

    That act goes on to say:

    Energy performance certificates on sale and rent

    6.—(1) Subject to regulation 8, this regulation applies where a building is to be sold or rented out.

    (2) The relevant person shall make available free of charge a valid energy performance certificate to any prospective buyer or tenant—

    (a)at the earliest opportunity; and

    (b)in any event no later than whichever is the earlier of—

    (i)in the case of a person who requests information about the building, the time at which the relevant person first makes available any information in writing about the building to the person; or

    (ii)in the case of a person who makes a request to view the building, the time at which the person views the building.

    Leave a comment:


  • KTC
    replied
    What risk are you mitigating here? A penalty charge notice for breach of The Energy Performance of Buildings (England and Wales) Regulations 2012, or no s21 for non-compliance of The Assured Shorthold Tenancy Notices and Prescribed Requirements (England) Regulations 2015?

    In the latter case, the requirement is only:
    The relevant person must ensure that a valid energy performance certificate has been given free of charge to the person who ultimately becomes the buyer or tenant.
    You don't need to show that it was seen by viewing, or even given before tenancy. No valid s21 penalty only applies if it still haven't be given by the time of s21.

    Leave a comment:


  • JK0
    started a topic Proving viewers saw EPC

    Proving viewers saw EPC

    What steps are other landlords taking to prove viewers (who become tenants) have seen the EPC before viewing? My friend is showing my property to some people today. In view of this, I gave him two copies of the EPC, and asked him to get them to sign both copies, and return one to me.

    (Of course the F***wit forgot, so those viewers will not be renting the place.)

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Reply to Extrication from garage let
    by Lawcruncher
    Just because something works does not mean it is justifed. It comes down to how much you consider you should follow the rule of law. If you allow yourself the luxury of bending the law a little in a way you consider does no real harm or you feel is justified because of the other person's conduct, then...
    26-02-2020, 10:56 AM
  • Extrication from garage let
    by AndrewDod
    Some advice would be useful. One of my properties has a detached garage which is specifically excluded from AST. Someone has been letting this with a formal agreement for about 6 years, and paying rent monthly. Suddenly the rent stopped 4 months ago. I had a peep through the door crack and there seems...
    24-02-2020, 18:14 PM
  • Reply to EPC and S21
    by theartfullodger
    I know what you mean but actually Form 6a does require tenant to leave: See....
    https://assets.publishing.service.go...ACTIVE__1_.pdf


    - - which is why I describe s21 as not compelling tenant to leave.

    Perhaps a landlord-friendly form drafter had a hand in the ...
    26-02-2020, 10:38 AM
  • EPC and S21
    by Slackjawedyokel
    Hi, I’ve been trying to move tenants on from one property, without success, for around four months (two S21 notices because the first, issued by my letting agent, was due to expire between Christmas and new year, and I’m basically soft). The 2 month term of the second s21 expired on 22/2/20. They...
    25-02-2020, 11:38 AM
  • Reply to How can I cover myself?
    by jpkeates
    Without a check in inventory, it will be difficult/impossible for anything that the landlord claims to overcome a challenge.

    I third party condition report is the gold standard, if you can afford one, that's pretty bullet proof.

    Otherwise lots of photos and video (with that...
    26-02-2020, 10:19 AM
  • How can I cover myself?
    by Reallyfeduptenant
    Hello,

    I am due to leave a property, it has been a nightmare from day one so I am really looking forward to it however, the LL has proved to be very dishonest. My question is because there was no inventory upon moving in how can I cover myself when leaving? I do not trust the LL won't make...
    26-02-2020, 09:59 AM
  • Landlord's Rent Guarantee insurance - defaults
    by markotsg
    Hello

    Would you recommend the Landlord's Rent Guarantee insurance provider?


    Please PM me

    thanks

    Marko
    26-02-2020, 10:13 AM
  • Reply to Extrication from garage let
    by jpkeates
    If you do offset the debt from the sales proceeds, the tenant could claim the money back.
    The amount of the debt would be a counterclaim, making the tenant's claim pointless.

    They're much more likely to claim that you undervalued the goods and try and claim for consequential loss...
    26-02-2020, 09:39 AM
  • Reply to Extrication from garage let
    by islandgirl
    Lawcruncher - you may be right legally (sure you are) but the letter I send always says the goods will be sold and outstanding debts plus cost of sale deducted. It works....
    26-02-2020, 09:23 AM
  • Reply to EPC and S21
    by jpkeates
    There are specialist eviction companies (some of whom advertise on this site in the directory section) as an alternative to solicitors.

    If you don't know what you're doing or are not confident in your knowledge, repossession can be stressful.
    26-02-2020, 09:06 AM
Working...
X