s21 and AST renewal..is it going to be worth the paper its written on?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • s21 and AST renewal..is it going to be worth the paper its written on?

    Just about to renew an AST rather than going to a statutory periodic. Being a contract with an end date, surely it is just that, a contract!

    Surely if I have an end date and it is a 2 way contract the tenant will have to go once served with 2 months notice/S21, but it appears LLs are talking about jumping ship as will be losing the right to evict. If all this is as appears then the break clause will be either one way or have to be omitted.

    Pointless having an end date if you cant evict. Am I missing something here.

    All parties across the board are up for this change in law so it WILL happen.

    Up to this point I have happily gone to a periodic as I fear maybe missing off a vital piece of paperwork and having it all blow up in my face.

    Thanks in advance


  • theartfullodger
    replied
    It's just the Tories realising younger people hate them & thinking abolish s21 will help.

    They (tories...) ain't very bright are they.

    Leave a comment:


  • lordluvus
    replied
    So the days of a polite and blameless eviction are over. Just as I wanted to start selling off.

    In 4 years I Need to sell one to pay off the mortgages. I will have to try the owner occupancy route. It seems lovely tenants that pay and want to stay will be as much a burden as those who don't.

    The govt has forgotten that most "amateur " landlords, only went into this to create their own pensions. I don't have family so had planned on spending the capital rather than living off the rents.

    Think on the bright side, they will probably raise capital gains next, to such heights that I wont want to sell anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • JK0
    replied
    Sounds like Mr Rachman's 'heavy mob' might find employment again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Morton579
    replied
    Originally posted by lordluvus View Post
    so 2 months before the end of the AST, I can't evict if they are paying rent?! Every AST has an end date.
    I believe that is true. If section 21 is scrapped, then you can not evict the tenants at all if they do not break the mandatory grounds in section 8 (not leaving at the end of the tenancy is not one of the mandatory grounds). So basically the end date that is written in the AST will not matter anymore, you tenants can stay as long as they like given that they do not violate the mandatory grounds in sections 8.

    However, in theory, you could try evicting your tenants using various discretionary grounds in section 8. But it is strongly advised against to do so. As it is completely hopeless, the judge will always favor the tenant, and you will end up losing your money and your property. The judge have the power to let the tenants stay in your property indefinitely if you use section 8 discretionary grounds for eviction (however, the judge do not have that power if you use section 8 mandatory grounds for eviction).

    Leave a comment:


  • KeepTheFaith
    replied
    Originally posted by theartfullodger View Post

    There's been no s21 equivalent in Scotland for some time:
    What do u do about your ASB tenants in Scotland now? Have they made them any easier to evict using grounds since the law changes?

    Leave a comment:


  • spiritdreams
    replied
    Originally posted by theartfullodger View Post
    You may take tenant to court to evict under a s8 notice with any of these 21 grounds (1-17 plus 7a + 7B + 14A + 14Zaz). See
    https://england.shelter.org.uk/legal...ured_tenancies

    There's been no s21 equivalent in Scotland for some time: As a Scottish landlord I'm extremely relaxed about this. Ditto the Tory plans to abolish s21 in England; Gosh there appear to be some somewhat sno-flake-y landlords about...

    Best wishes to all, including those who disagree with me.
    The only viable ground for repossession under section 8 is owner occupy, you would have a hard time getting tenant out if you e.g. want to sell the property.

    The main issue with S21 being abolished is that it would put even more pressure for courts in S8, I would envision a longer wait time for any eviction types.

    Leave a comment:


  • JK0
    replied
    Originally posted by theartfullodger View Post

    There's been no s21 equivalent in Scotland for some time: As a Scottish landlord I'm extremely relaxed about this. Ditto the Tory plans to abolish s21 in England; Gosh there appear to be some somewhat sno-flake-y landlords about...
    Presumably most of your tenancies can still be ended if the tenants misbehave?

    You'd be pretty unlucky to have let to Rab C Nesbitt already. I'm going to have such schadenfreude if you do get one.

    Leave a comment:


  • boletus
    replied
    I doubt this will come into effect in the next 6 months (or 12 months for that matter) even if it was top of the agenda. And it's probably unlikely to apply to existing tenancies anyway.

    I think it's a daft idea but I'll work round it and look forward to the increased rent.

    Leave a comment:


  • leaseholder64
    replied
    You can't get them out that quickly even under the current rules. At that point, you then request possession from the court, but the you will have to wait for a court date. Even if given possession, you cannot re-enter until the tenant surrenders, your you have brought the bailiffs in.

    Leave a comment:


  • theartfullodger
    replied
    Originally posted by lordluvus View Post
    ..................

    Pointless having an end date if you cant evict. Am I missing something here.

    ......
    You may take tenant to court to evict under a s8 notice with any of these 21 grounds (1-17 plus 7a + 7B + 14A + 14Zaz). See
    https://england.shelter.org.uk/legal...ured_tenancies

    There's been no s21 equivalent in Scotland for some time: As a Scottish landlord I'm extremely relaxed about this. Ditto the Tory plans to abolish s21 in England; Gosh there appear to be some somewhat sno-flake-y landlords about...

    Best wishes to all, including those who disagree with me.

    Leave a comment:


  • lordluvus
    replied
    so 2 months before the end of the AST, I can't evict if they are paying rent?! Every AST has an end date.

    I was meaning if neither tenant or myself are in breach can I not serve the s21 to say the end of the AST is in 2 months and I want them out.
    It seems I am hearing that I cant under the new rules

    LLs sometimes want the property back to renovate, sell or for the want of giving no reason at all, because such freedom of will was one of the joys of owning.

    Cant believe these changes if its all true

    Leave a comment:


  • leaseholder64
    replied
    Originally posted by lordluvus View Post
    Just about to renew an AST rather than going to a statutory periodic. Being a contract with an end date, surely it is just that, a contract!
    The only compensation I could see you getting for breach of that contract would be the rent, so if they continue to pay the rent you would have no basis on which to claim compensation.

    In any case, the Housing Acts remove some terms about termination from ASTs anyway, so, subject to checking the details, such terms may not actually be insertable in an AST.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • New Tenancy Issues
    AXY
    Good Evening All,

    I found this forum by a happy accident and would like advice on a tenancy issues on which I am not an well versed in.

    I have recently moved into a property which has a few issues that are making my stay as a tenant quite uncomfortable. The landlord was being...
    25-05-2019, 18:22 PM
  • Reply to New Tenancy Issues
    DPT57
    Just deal with the letting agent.
    26-05-2019, 14:16 PM
  • Renewing A Tenancy
    ABC123
    The tenant wants to renew the tenancy for a further fixed term of 3 years (with a break-clause). The current tenancy agreement has some special terms (e.g. the T can remove certain items of furniture but will have to replace them with like-for-like furniture at the end of the tenancy).

    ...
    24-05-2019, 13:31 PM
  • Reply to Renewing A Tenancy
    DPT57
    Otherwise serve a s13 notice of rent increase....
    26-05-2019, 14:13 PM
  • Lettings Agent increasing the rent without asking the landlord
    Jimmy Bean
    I'm an independent landlord and have a happy tenant coming to the end of a 12 month rental agreement. The property was advertised and let with the help of a lettings agent on a let only agreement (not managed). I have found out from the tenant that he received a letter from the estate agency a month...
    26-05-2019, 14:11 PM
  • Neighbour turning our applicants away
    tatemono
    So we have a terraced property we're finding hard to let. Twice we've had applicants pass referencing and give us a move in date. However, before they could sign the AST, in the process of going back to check out the street, they've been approached by a neighbour who has persuaded them not to take up...
    24-05-2019, 13:52 PM
  • Reply to Neighbour turning our applicants away
    tatemono
    seriously boletus.... back off. You partly, not wholly, misjudged the situation and I explained so you could get a fuller picture. We've got other properties similar spec same area all let fine. I didn't come here asking for abuse. And yeah, if the neighbour hadn't spoken to the last two tenants, one...
    26-05-2019, 14:08 PM
  • Reply to New Tenancy Issues
    leaseholder64
    There doesn't have to be a written agreement, even if they are not related
    26-05-2019, 13:30 PM
  • Reply to New Tenancy Issues
    leaseholder64
    Are there any owner occupiers who share the fan?

    Do you know who is responsible for managing the communal areas (not just the managing agent, but who instructs them)?

    Is there a managing agent?

    You should have been notified for an England or Wales address for contacting...
    26-05-2019, 13:23 PM
  • Reply to New Tenancy Issues
    AXY
    Your points are well taken. But how do I ascertain that B is acting as agent for A and has relevant authority to do so?
    Am I correct in assuming that if this is the case - then there should be some sort of paperwork confirming the same?
    Or because of their blood relationship B can act on...
    26-05-2019, 13:17 PM
Working...
X