Removing joint tenant from rolling AST

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Removing joint tenant from rolling AST

    Hi. Hope you can help me.

    I live with my wife, child and disabled adult brother in law (A).

    A and myself are in a joint AST. The fixed term has ended and it is rolling.

    My wife is not on the lease (as she has poor credit history and does not have an income and it would have affected our ability to obtain the tenancy). She is a permitted occupier.

    Due to A's condition he is having to move out and we need to remove A from the joint tenancy so that he can take up a new tenancy.

    I wish to remain in the property and carry on the tenancy as normal.

    I am a professional with decent credit history and sufficient salary to cover the rent. I still have the same job that I had when I started the tenancy. Nothing has changed.

    First issue is that my letting agent wants to charge A a £25 fee for providing a reference to his new landlord? Is this fair and reasonable?

    Secondly, the letting agent wants me, and my wife, to start a brand new tenancy and for us both to go through the whole referencing process again- with all the fees that go with it!

    Is this correct?

    What is the most efficient and cheapest way to remove A from the joint tenancy?

    I appreciate your time and help.


    #2
    What the agent is proposing (ignoring the fee element) is the best solution.
    The current joint tenancy ends and a completely new one begins - with any issues with the "old" deposit sorted and the deposit returned and a new deposit protected.
    There isn't really any other way to remove a joint tenant other than ending the tenancy.

    Your wife doesn't have to be on the AST necessarily, she could presumably continue to be an occupant as now.
    Which would mean you would be the only tenant.

    Fees for providing a reference, at £25 that sounds not as bad as it could be.
    The fees for the referencing and creation of a new tenancy would be in line with the amount of work for any new tenancy (i.e. probably outrageous and they'll charge the landlord too).
    But inevitable until June 1st, when they're banned.
    When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
    Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

    Comment


      #3
      It is correct that you really need a new tenancy. The advice, given here, is that any attempt to remove or replace a tenant in a joint tenancy is inadvisable.

      It is really up to the landlord as to the referencing process, although I can't see why they want new references. They may well want a new credit check.

      Except under some council licensing schemes, landlords are not obliged to give references, so it seems to me that they can charge someone for them. It will soon be illegal to charge the prospective tenant, but isn't illegal yet.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by leaseholder64 View Post
        It is correct that you really need a new tenancy.
        Not necessarily so. You could just continue on the periodic tenancy with you and A as named tenants.

        Originally posted by leaseholder64 View Post
        landlords are not obliged to give references, so it seems to me that they can charge someone for them. It will soon be illegal to charge the prospective tenant, but isn't illegal yet.
        I think that charging to write a reference for a new agency/landlord will not be illegal under the Tenant Fees Act, as it is not to do with the tenancy provided by the LL/agent that is charging.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by MdeB View Post
          Not necessarily so. You could just continue on the periodic tenancy with you and A as named tenants.
          It would have issues with any benefits though.
          I think that charging to write a reference for a new agency/landlord will not be illegal under the Tenant Fees Act, as it is not to do with the tenancy provided by the LL/agent that is charging.[/QUOTE]
          It's not a permitted payment, so it will be banned.
          They could charge the new landlord/agent, though.
          When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
          Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by jpkeates View Post
            It's not a permitted payment, so it will be banned.
            Oh yes, S1.(6)(f) and S 2.(5)(e)

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • Reply to Advice Needed
              by Hudson01
              I am very sorry to hear about the issue, i can add little more to what has already been said above, I am one of those lanldords spoken about in terms of about to sell up........ all that has been pointed out as to why we are all leaving is totally true, it has simply become too much hassle and with...
              16-05-2022, 20:53 PM
            • Advice Needed
              by Confused2022
              Hello!


              I an trying to get as much information and advice for someone whom is very vulnerable and has many health problems.

              The issue is they have lived at a property which they’ve rented now for 2 years just over, never missed a rental payment and never had any issues,...
              15-05-2022, 15:45 PM
            • Reply to Invoice for work - am I being unreasonable?
              by Hudson01
              I agree with one of the other posts, Company A should have sorted the whole job, it sounds like a 10 mins job with maybe a collar for the pipework being tightened up and then some basthroom sealant ...........you are right.......... just under a ' monkey'' (Arthur Daley speak) for what is a simple pipe...
              16-05-2022, 18:46 PM
            • Invoice for work - am I being unreasonable?
              by Laurasplog
              We have a London flat managed by an agent (full management service).

              My husband and I were abroad, and got a call from the council saying the property was leaking sewage into the flat below. We contacted our agent immediately who sent someone around the same day (Company A).

              ...
              16-05-2022, 12:58 PM
            • Reply to Invoice for work - am I being unreasonable?
              by theartfullodger
              What does your agreement (or terms & conditions sent) with this say about such queries, please? I'd start there first & then probably their complaints process (if they have one)

              Is this the lettings agent on the block (of flats) management agent please?

              I humbly note...
              16-05-2022, 16:15 PM
            • Reply to Invoice for work - am I being unreasonable?
              by Laurasplog
              The pipework was found to be sound. I think Company A were there as an emergency "see if it's sewage and shut off the water if necessary". They said it was a pipework problem and a sealant problem. Company B carried out a full audit on the pipes and found it was only a sealant problem....
              16-05-2022, 14:59 PM
            • Reply to Invoice for work - am I being unreasonable?
              by Laurasplog
              The letting agent engaged all of them. We gave them an instruction to fix whatever the problem was after the notification from the council there was a problem - we pay for a full management service.

              I doubt the agency will give us money back because they've paid it out directly to the contractor,...
              16-05-2022, 14:58 PM
            • Reply to Buying a tenanted residential property
              by theartfullodger
              In November 1979 BoE base rate hit 17% under Thatcher's government. My building society was kind by only raising their rates to 15%.....

              IMHO rates will continue to rise. Sorry.

              What you are proposing would breach your mortgage terms and possibly result in place being repo'd....
              16-05-2022, 14:30 PM
            Working...
            X