Contractual term in fixed-term and periodic tenancy

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Contractual term in fixed-term and periodic tenancy

    Dear all,

    I have just finished a 2 year tenancy (Dec 2016 to Nov 2018).
    Specifically, the fixed-term period was the initial three months from Dec 2016 to Feb 2017 (one tenancy agreement for three months). Then, from Feb 2017 onwards, the tenancy changed to a monthly rolling contract, in which I signed a new tenancy agreement every month.

    Specifically, the fixed-term tenancy agreement was slightly more detailed than the monthly rolling tenancy agreement. My question, is therefore, whether clauses in the fixed-term still apply to that of the rolling period, as I've actually signed a new less-detailed tenancy agreement every month, with dates clearly specified for that particular month, during the rolling period.

    One of the miscellaneous provision in the monthly rolling contract, read as follows: "This document constitutes the entirely of the agreement between the parties and the terms of the Short-Term Let. It supersedes any prior representations which may have been made, whether orally or in writing. Any modification to this Agreement or the Terms of the Short Term let must be made in writing and signed by both the Property Owner and the guest"

    Therefore, it seems that the any clauses in the fixed-term period do not apply anymore, as I signed a new agreement every month during the rolling period, with the clause stated above.

    I would be grateful for your insight.

    #2
    I think you're right.

    What's the underlying reason for the question?
    I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.

    I do not answer questions through private messages which should be posted publicly on the forum.

    Comment


      #3
      Hmm. Sounds like a dodgy LL or agent.

      From the given wording, it would appear that no prior agreement has any standing.

      If a new tenancy agreement was signed each month, then that created a new tenancy.
      That may have given the LL issues with deposit protection rules.

      What is the reason for your enquiry?

      Comment


        #4
        I can't think of any upside for the landlord in doing this and potentially its incredibly stupid for reasons of notice period, service of documents, deposit requirements etc. If this is for a failure to correctly protect the original deposit then please keep us posted on the eventual outcome as I am sure we would all like to know whether the judge awards a penalty for each new tenancy!

        Comment


          #5
          Can you even have a one month ast? Surely the minimum term has to be 2 months?

          Comment


            #6
            There's no minimum length for AST since January 1997.
            I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.

            I do not answer questions through private messages which should be posted publicly on the forum.

            Comment


              #7
              I doubt OP signed a new AST each month after end of 3 month fixed term!

              Comment


                #8
                Thank you very much for all your answers.

                To clarify with 'mariner' specifically, yes, I signed a new contract every month after the initial three months fixed-term contract; I am not sure what confusion is?

                Comment


                  #9
                  It's not so much confusion as suprise. Signing a new agreement every month is not a usual thing to happen with tenancy.
                  I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.

                  I do not answer questions through private messages which should be posted publicly on the forum.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Whoever came up with the idea of signing a new agreement every month is either a complete duffer or has spotted something the rest of us have missed.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Whilst a one month AST is legal , one item has been overlooked if the actual property is in Mortgage; Lenders require a minimum of 6 months to be put in place and if deemed appropriate allow it to revert to a Periodic agreement, if subsequently a new AST is required by the Landlord then this must be for a minimum of 6 months.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
                        Whoever came up with the idea of signing a new agreement every month is either a complete duffer or has spotted something the rest of us have missed.
                        I read a post on another site where a LL thought that by signing a new agreement every month meant that the tenancy could be ended with one month's notice.

                        Comment

                        Latest Activity

                        Collapse

                        • Pets causing eviction
                          Wiffle
                          Hi everyone,

                          Bit of background to start with.

                          We are new tenants of a rental property and told not only our letting agent but our landlord that we were the owners of two dogs.

                          The letting agent checked with the landlord that dogs were ok and they agreed as long...
                          17-06-2019, 17:15 PM
                        • Reply to Pets causing eviction
                          Wiffle
                          Thanks for the reply.

                          The tenancy agreement does state no pets without permission from the landlord and as I previously stated we asked and were given that permission. We didn't have to sign anything to state the dogs were involved in the tenancy but after speaking to the letting agent...
                          17-06-2019, 17:33 PM
                        • Reply to Pets causing eviction
                          Macromia
                          What does your lease say?
                          If your lease says that no pets are allowed, do you have anything in writing to say that it has been agreed that you can have the dogs at the property - and, if so, exactly what does that say?
                          17-06-2019, 17:26 PM
                        • Company lets
                          paulamis
                          My company are bringing in some Indian nationals for a few months training.

                          Secretary went and asked local agents and was fobbed off with nonsense like, "has to be an AST and the law says min 1 yr", I guess the agents don't need the complication.
                          ...
                          17-06-2019, 11:41 AM
                        • Reply to Company lets
                          JK0
                          I suggest your company buys some properties for this purpose.
                          17-06-2019, 17:22 PM
                        • licensee vs tenant
                          imjustbait
                          i have been given 14 days notice -

                          i asked my friend for help and to sort things out if possible, as he works in lettings etc -

                          he said to be this is a licensee contract not an (AST) one - (i didnt know)


                          basically, i want to know what rights i have to...
                          07-02-2019, 20:58 PM
                        • Reply to licensee vs tenant
                          tenant83
                          I don't get why you wouldn't have applied for Universal Credit and got a loan from them to cover your rent. You may have fell behind 5 or 6 weeks, but the loan would have covered that. I don't get the reason for not paying the rent at all for so many months. You've basically shot yourself in the foot....
                          17-06-2019, 17:12 PM
                        • Reply to Company lets
                          Wainwright
                          On the other hand, my brother has let (via agent) his property to a company (a well known technological giant) for the past few years with no problems whatsoever! He's found the tenants (foreign nationals) much better than former ones. Rent is always paid on time....
                          17-06-2019, 16:58 PM
                        • Damage not recorded in inventory
                          rosieflowers
                          Hi,

                          We recently went in to do some (legitimate, reasonable) repairs on our let property and saw that the tenant has melted some of the UPVC window sill which is directly above the electric hob. It's an area of about one inch wide and six inches long and the burn is partly superficial but...
                          17-06-2019, 08:18 AM
                        • Reply to Damage not recorded in inventory
                          Stef Cooke
                          Having read your description and seen the picture I would assign that to the landlord if I were the clerk, much as I do heat warped doors around built in cookers.

                          As nukecad said, you could trim it back flush to the wall and line the width of the hob with tiles, stainless steel etc. But...
                          17-06-2019, 16:41 PM
                        Working...
                        X