Bicycle Question

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Bicycle Question


    I live in a building that has 2 flats. The entrance to our building has a barred gate. My neighbour rents out her flat through a letting agency. My neighbour's tenant started chaining her bike to the gate outside and I wonder whether anyone knows whether this is a health and safety issue? She says the agency told her to do it. Of course I am also aggrieved that it is ugly at my entrance. In addition, the bike sticks out over the road (which is a private road) that is little more than one vehicle in width. So she is blocking vehicle access down the Mews.

    I have approached the agency who have done precisely nothing. I am just wondering whether there is a health and safety issue here, whether it is a trip hazard and whether it would be worth even asking the police to come and take a look?

    Thank you.
    Attached Files

    It;s not possible to know whether it is a health and safety issue just from the photograph, as we cannot see whether or not you would already have reached a place of safety on the far side of the gate.

    It is a trespass against the owner of the gate and against the owner of the road, and violates the right of way of anyone who has a right to drive over the road.

    The dustbin may be trespassing as well.

    This assumes there are no easements permitting bicycles/dustbins, in the relevant title documents.


      From what I see, this is an obstruction to your "Right to free and unobstructed access to your property"
      If it was me, I would pivot the bike ( as it's chained to the rails, ) so that the bike is behind the dustbin.
      Dust bin Hard against the bike.
      It's your right to remove the obstruction.


        Wow, that's an old-fashioned bin! No wheelie bins for you then?

        H&S or not you should handle this as a neighbour dispute initially without getting a letting agency to do it, although I'd be surprised they have the authority to tell your neighbour to chain to a freeholder-owned (yes?) gate . See excellent advice here..

        If the building with two flats has a freeholder, (? you a shareholder) that owns the gate, have you raised the matter with the freeholder?
        You say private road: What did the owner of the private road say/do when you raised the matter with them? (Presumably a freeholder, jointly owned by adjoining property owners?)
        I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...


          Thank you all for your comments. I have previously spoken to the tenant who says the agency told her to do that. It seems to me she is hiding behind the agency but it is difficult to continue a conversation when that is said - hence my approach to the agency. The interaction between the two of us has deteriorated in any case. I offered to show her the land registry documents that would indicate that a) that particular piece of land belongs to our immediate neighbour and b) we all have rights to vehicle access. It is written into my lease also that I am not allowed to park a vehicle where it might block access.

          I have asked my neighbour who also lets her property to assist me in this as it is attached to the freehold of her property, but she has not been forthcoming about it. The road is effectively parcelled up between a number of different properties.

          I have also spoken to the owner of the flat downstairs who agrees it is poorly parked but really wants me to find somewhere else for her to put it - which I think is her job and in any case, I'm not sure where else it could go.

          Moving the bike behind the dustbin would be fine but unfortunately there is a door immediately to the side of that dustbin which would be blocked. I think our freeholder is unlikely to respond - they live abroad anyway. This is why I was hoping I could insist on health and safety grounds that it be removed.


            The freeholder would be responsible for any safety issue, wherever they actually live.


              Seems to me that it is a safety issue, at it is obstructing a fire-escape route.


                Originally posted by MdeB View Post
                Seems to me that it is a safety issue, at it is obstructing a fire-escape route.
                As I said before, it is difficult to be sure just from the photograph. This sort of passage can open into another safe area.

                However, it is the wrong side of a place of safety, the freeholder needs to do a proper fire risk assessment, as it is missing a "Fire Exit Keep Clear" sign, which it would need in that case.


                  Thank you all for your help which has been really useful. I will pursue the fire/safety route.


                  Latest Activity


                  • Eviction notice s21
                    I refer to the checklist here:
                    ​​​​​​The AST began in July 2015 and was 12 months. Nothing has been signed since.
                    On question 6 I am not sure which answer to follow.
                    There is a mention...
                    18-09-2019, 21:32 PM
                  • Reply to Eviction notice s21
                    It refers to 'The tenancy'. If it meant 'when did periodic tenancy start' it would have said so.
                    19-09-2019, 10:05 AM
                  • Reply to Eviction notice s21
                    The AST began before the October 15 date but the spt began after (July 16) so not sure which option to choose on the flowchart
                    19-09-2019, 10:02 AM
                  • licensee vs tenant
                    i have been given 14 days notice -

                    i asked my friend for help and to sort things out if possible, as he works in lettings etc -

                    he said to be this is a licensee contract not an (AST) one - (i didnt know)

                    basically, i want to know what rights i have to...
                    07-02-2019, 20:58 PM
                  • Reply to licensee vs tenant
                    You need to avoid this way of thinking.
                    There is zero possibility of a set of circumstances arising where you don't owe rent while you are living in this property.

                    In fact your argument that it's a tenancy depends on it, because if rent wasn't due, it's not a tenancy.

                    19-09-2019, 09:51 AM
                  • Reply to Eviction notice s21
                    Unless your tenancy agreement contains terms that indicate that the tenancy has no fixed term that ends, but has an initial term of 12 months that then continues, after the 12 months fixed term, a new periodic tenancy began.

                    That's the statutory periodic tenancy....
                    19-09-2019, 09:38 AM
                  • Gov allowing tenants to buy PRS housing
                    I've just heard on the Andrew Marr show that if somebody gets in (I wasn't listening fully so I don't know who it was, I've no doubt somebody on here can name that person), they will allow tenants to buy their PRS property at a price that means the landlord will not lose out.

                    Surely this...
                    08-09-2019, 08:25 AM
                  • Reply to Gov allowing tenants to buy PRS housing
                    That's a fallacy.

                    In some sense, it's possible to argue that nothing is knowable.
                    But that's not a viable way of going through life.
                    There's no 100% certainty that the sun will rise tomorrow, but it almost certainly will, so you'd better be prepared to get up and go to work....
                    19-09-2019, 09:26 AM
                  • WITHOUT PREJUDICE email
                    Hi, I proposed to settle pre trial in a WITHOUT PREJUDICE headed email to the other party. They refused to settle.

                    Am I permitted to make the judge aware that I tried to settle in a WITHOUT PREJUDICE email, but this wasn’t agreed to? Or is it the case that because my email was headed...
                    18-09-2019, 22:57 PM
                  • Reply to WITHOUT PREJUDICE email
                    What sort of case is this. If a "small claims case" that you are dealing with yourself (and so is the other side) whether you tried to mediate/settle etc is not that relevant. Normally you might bring it up where costs are discussed.

                    If you win then you win -- what you agreed...
                    19-09-2019, 09:22 AM