Blockage responsibility

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Blockage responsibility

    Hi all

    if there is a sink or toilet blockage caused by the tenants. Who is responsible for payment to resolve this

    many thanks

    #2
    This is one of those grey areas, if you want a maintain a good relationship with the tenant, then pay for it to be done, or negotiate 50/50. If it happens again then charge them. Also if the property is a HMO it will be hard to identify which tenant caused it.

    If you hire someone to sort it out and they find out the root cause is, then you may have a chance to claim the money from the tenant for it.

    Comment


      #3
      If caused by the tenants and not due to an integral fault with the plumbing then clearance of the blockage is down to the tenant. However I normally attend as ll as well and advise about avoiding disposal of tampons and sanitary towels, cotton buds and wipes down the toilet. All big culprits of blockages.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by hsa1 View Post
        if there is a sink or toilet blockage caused by the tenants. Who is responsible for payment to resolve this
        Lord Denning no less answered that very question: The tenant must take proper care of the place. He must, if he is going away for the winter, turn off the water and empty the boiler. He must clean the chimneys, where necessary, and also the windows. He must mend the electric light when it fuses. He must unstop the sink when it is blocked by his waste. In short, he must do the little jobs about the place which a reasonable tenant would do.

        Note that it says "his" waste. There is no obligation to unblock a sink blocked by the previous occupier's waste. Further, as Jonn66 suggests, it is implicit that the rule only applies if the plumbing is sound. The rule is of course negated if the terms of the tenancy impose the obligation on the landlord.

        Comment


          #5
          I would argue that if the blockage occurs through normal use then the landlord should pay as he has a responsibility to maintain the sewage system. If the blockage is due to unreasonable use by the tenant then he should pay.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by davett View Post
            I would argue that if the blockage occurs through normal use then the landlord should pay as he has a responsibility to maintain the sewage system. If the blockage is due to unreasonable use by the tenant then he should pay.
            A counter argument to that is that a prudent tenant, rather than waiting for the sink to become blocked, takes steps to ensure it does not become blocked by using a drain cleaning preparation at regular intervals.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by davett View Post
              I would argue that if the blockage occurs through normal use then the landlord should pay as he has a responsibility to maintain the sewage system. If the blockage is due to unreasonable use by the tenant then he should pay.
              If the blockage is in the underground sewage system it can be caused by roots or some damage to the sewer. But that kind of blockage is usually downstream.

              A sink drain or toilet is almost impossible to block with "normal" use.
              When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
              Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by jpkeates View Post

                A sink drain or toilet is almost impossible to block with "normal" use.
                I owned a house where in the downstairs loo the idiot builder had made the flow need to turn through 270 degrees over a sharp bend. It would regularly block from normal use.


                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by davett View Post

                  I owned a house where in the downstairs loo the idiot builder had made the flow need to turn through 270 degrees over a sharp bend. It would regularly block from normal use.

                  Jon66 has already covered that circumstance when he said "...and not due to an integral fault with the plumbing"

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by davett View Post
                    I owned a house where in the downstairs loo the idiot builder had made the flow need to turn through 270 degrees over a sharp bend. It would regularly block from normal use.
                    That blockage was caused by a design fault, not by normal use.
                    In the same way that roots growing into a sewer would be the cause of a blockage, not the stuff that actually formed the blockage.

                    If you were letting your property with the sharp turn in the pipes, there wouldn't be a dispute about who would pay for the drains to be cleared.
                    When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                    Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                    Comment


                      #11
                      My point was that from the tenant's point of view, normal use in that house would result in a blockage. Given that most builders these days use the cheapest rubbish they can get away with, as a tenant if the drains repeatedly block through what I consider to be normal use, I'd be looking to see what is wrong with them.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        So would I.
                        But, that requires inferring a recurring issue into the original question.

                        I've can only recall one time a tenant's drain block (that I was involved in) wasn't caused by flushing something inappropriate and that was caused by a neighbour doing the flushing.
                        When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                        Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                        Comment

                        Latest Activity

                        Collapse

                        • Landlord ending tenancy
                          Ceejay5
                          I have interest from a prospective new tenant whose current landlord gave her two months' notice on 25 October (he wants to sell the property). Her rental period is monthly and runs from the 25th of each month so, as she has not yet given a month's notice, she feels obliged to pay the rent right up...
                          11-11-2018, 10:50 AM
                        • Reply to Landlord ending tenancy
                          StuartH
                          I had not actively considered coming to a different conclusion based on whether there had been any communication of the tenant's intention prior to his departure, and have no difficulty in agreeing with you that there is a surrender where, for example, the parties have arranged to handover keys and...
                          16-11-2018, 14:18 PM
                        • Section 21 notice
                          Landlord183
                          I have a housing benefit tenant who tops up since 2013. Since than we have renewed her contract twice as council were giving her trouble. Her last contract was issued on 9/4/2015, so as I understand it is now a periodic tenancy. The contract states that rent is monthly but the housing benefit pays 4...
                          16-11-2018, 12:24 PM
                        • Reply to Section 21 notice
                          Landlord183
                          Thank you KTC and jpkeates. You have helped me to think more clearly. using form 6A and giving 2 months notice.. very grateful for advise
                          16-11-2018, 14:10 PM
                        • Reply to Section 21 notice
                          KTC
                          You can use Form 6A. In fact, you may have to use Form 6A depending on how legislative amendment and commencement is interpreted. It's not something worth taking a risk over, just use the prescribed form.

                          EPC, GSC, and How to Rent is not required before s21 given the date of the tenancy....
                          16-11-2018, 13:58 PM
                        • Reply to Landlord ending tenancy
                          Lawcruncher
                          Before the HA 1988 came into force the law recognised various ways in which a tenancy could come to an end and they did not include the tenant simply leaving. Nothing in the HA 1988 changed that.

                          It is a fundamental principle of landlord and tenant law that at any given moment the parties...
                          16-11-2018, 13:54 PM
                        • Reply to Section 21 notice
                          jpkeates
                          Despite when the rent was actually paid, it was due on the 20th of the month, and the tenancy was monthly from 20th to the 19th of each month.

                          You can serve s21 notice giving a minimum of 2 month's notice ending on any date, but ending on 19th would be most convenient in terms of working...
                          16-11-2018, 13:53 PM
                        • Which Portal For Finding New Tenants
                          Claymore
                          Hi

                          My preferred Portal has generally been Upad for finding new tenants (SE London area).

                          Have just discovered Upad's fees have shot right up and their minimum fee is £149. Quite a jump from £99.

                          Any recommendations for alterntive advertising?

                          Many...
                          16-11-2018, 13:13 PM
                        • Reply to Which Portal For Finding New Tenants
                          patray
                          I use lettingaproperty.com for property in S W London. Advert goes online promptly and enquiries come through quickly. Very satisfied with them. However they have also increased their prices but not quite as much. Last August 2017 £99. This July 2018 £129.
                          ​​​​​
                          16-11-2018, 13:50 PM
                        • Reply to Section 21 notice
                          Landlord183
                          these are clauses from tenancy tenancy agreement reads

                          " The term of tenancy is for one year to commence 20 August 2014.

                          Should the tenant remain in possession of the property with the consent of landlord after the natural expiration of this agreement, a new tenancy...
                          16-11-2018, 13:41 PM
                        Working...
                        X