Tenant wants to change leaving date after giving notice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Tenant wants to change leaving date after giving notice

    hi guys looking for some help here:

    I have a tenant who is currently on a periodic tenancy (after fixed term finished) ending on the 12th of each month, they gave me notice on July 18th to terminate on Aug 22nd. The AST states "You must give at least four weeks (or a month if you pay rent monthly) notice to end it. This notice must end on the last day of a tenancy period", however I accepted their request for this date as they had given me more than a months notice. The tenant has now (1 week before they are due to leave) announced that they need more time and that legally they are entitled to stay in the property till 12th Sept as this is the end of their rental period even though they requested an earlier date and I accepted it (both in writing). Is this correct or can I demand that they move out on the 22nd as agreed? Could they argue that they gave invalid notice and need to give it again correctly and end up staying even longer? Normally I would let them stay as long as they want but I have already got another tenant with a signed contract starting Aug 29th so this has me in a difficult position! sorry if this has already been answered here but I couldn't find a similar question
    Jim







    #2
    If the tenant gave notice and you accepted it, that's it.
    The tenant has given valid notice because you've agreed to it.

    The tenant can't rescind or change their notice.

    If you hadn't agreed to it, the tenant's notice would have been invalid, because regardless of what the tenancy agreement says, in a periodic contract that arose as a result of the tenant staying beyond the fixed term, they have to give notice of at least a month ending at the end of a rental period.

    If they stay beyond the date they agreed to move out, they are holding over and you are entitled to charge a fee (which isn't rent and mustn't be confused with or referred to as rent) called mesne profit which is charged at double what the rent would have been.

    You need to reach a resolution with the tenant, because evicting them will require a court hearing, and you don't have time before the next tenant wants to move in.
    When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
    Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

    Comment


      #3
      thanks for giving such a clear answer, it looks like at least I have the law behind me as a negotiating tool then..

      Comment


        #4
        Your best approach would be to tell the tenant that they're wrong, but to get some legal advice (shelter, solicitor, citizens advice) rather than argue the toss with you.
        There's no point getting into a debate about it.
        When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
        Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by jpkeates View Post
          you are entitled to charge a fee (which isn't rent and mustn't be confused with or referred to as rent) called mesne profit which is charged at double what the rent would have been.
          I believe this must be charged in arrears.
          If charged in advance, then I believe it is considered to be rent and creates a new tenancy.

          Comment


            #6
            In future don't sign on a new person until the old one leaves, (and you have checked the place over for repairs.)

            Carrying on as you have done was bound to end in tears at some point, wasn't it?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by MdeB View Post

              I believe this must be charged in arrears.
              If charged in advance, then I believe it is considered to be rent and creates a new tenancy.
              Makes sense (I have some doubts about the whole notion other than as a threat anyway).
              On a practical level, it would probably have to be charged in arrears, if only because it's compensatory.
              When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
              Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

              Comment


                #8
                Thanks some good advice there, thankfully the new tenants have been able to delay their moving date

                Comment


                  #9
                  Claim the double rent if they do not leave, and give the excess over expected rent to your new tenant as a goodwill gesture.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    It's not double rent.
                    When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                    Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by jpkeates View Post
                      It's not double rent.
                      Hmm! Interesting!

                      The Distress For Rent act uses the terms "double the rent" and "double rent" (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/apgb/G.../19/section/18)

                      Comment


                        #12
                        If you accept the money as rent, you run the risk of creating a tenancy.
                        The 18th century legislation hasn't been updated in line with other legislation and practices.

                        I'd really hate to rely on it in real life (it's something that should probably have been repealed years ago).
                        When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                        Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by jpkeates View Post
                          If you accept the money as rent, you run the risk of creating a tenancy.
                          I agree.

                          (it's something that should probably have been repealed years ago)
                          I don't agree. There needs to be some penalty for tenants failing to comply with their obligations.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by MdeB View Post
                            don't agree. There needs to be some penalty for tenants failing to comply with their obligations.
                            But not something from 1737, it's not fit for purpose today.

                            There needs to be some way for me to get to London, but I'd rather not rely on a horse.
                            When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                            Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Why is it not fit for purpose? Just because it's old doesn't mean there's anything wrong with it. Unless you have specific objections or alternatives, then your only problem seems to be that it's old?
                              I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.

                              I do not answer questions through private messages which should be posted publicly on the forum.

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Reply to New front door and windows
                                by royw
                                It would be better to get a specialist window fitter or someone recommended by the manufacturer rather than use the 'go to guy'.
                                26-07-2021, 22:02 PM
                              • New front door and windows
                                by Steve95
                                I'm looking into having a new front door, living room and first floor windows fitted to my rental property, and the letting agency "go to guy" really doesn't inspire confidence when I met him today! (On other quotes for different work) He mentioned that the glass needs to be toughened if...
                                26-07-2021, 21:32 PM
                              • Reply to New front door and windows
                                by ash72
                                Yes if the windows are below a certain height, they need to be toughened glass so that someone can't accidentally break it. If they are at standard level then no toughened glass is required. Also windows need to be a certain width in case of fire.

                                FENSA is only the body that regulates the...
                                26-07-2021, 21:41 PM
                              • Reply to Breeding dogs without evidence
                                by ash72
                                As the T has stated, there isn't much more you can do, see if they leave in Oct, if not follow up with proceeding to the courts and eventually bailiffs if they have not left.
                                26-07-2021, 21:35 PM
                              • Breeding dogs without evidence
                                by Mason1
                                Our tenants have broken the tenancy agreement 9 times - painting my kitchen cupboards and chopping down trees. So it’s section 21. My issue is. We allowed 3 dogs and were told they would be housed outside and they intended to build a kennel. This hadn’t happened, instead they seem to be converting...
                                26-07-2021, 18:45 PM
                              • Reply to Imminent eviction
                                by nreid
                                Congratulations Perce. I’m so happy to hear this is over. You have been through total hell with this. I remember the support you gave me - and how upbeat and optimistic you were about it all. Yours was 16 months, mine was 21 months. I’ve left the place empty. Cannot bear dealing with it or hearing...
                                26-07-2021, 18:30 PM
                              • Imminent eviction
                                by Perce
                                Hello All

                                Update : My tenant has no plans to move out before bailiffs arrive which is imminent. I have no clue what the bailiffs will do. He will start complaining that he has nowhere to go although he lives somewhere else just keeps his stuff in the property for free, he might say...
                                21-07-2021, 19:10 PM
                              • Reply to Rent Increase
                                by octopeg
                                Thanks Ash and Artful, yes the tenant has already paid the 1st month at the new rate, As you suggest Ash, I will write back to them confirming the new rate.
                                26-07-2021, 17:50 PM
                              • Rent Increase
                                by octopeg
                                Hi All, new to this site and the buy to let scene in general.
                                I have a property that I let on an Assured Shorthold Tenancy. The fixed term of 1 year has just expired and I have allowed this tenancy to roll into a Periodic Tenancy, ie i have done nothing!
                                Except, a few days before the end...
                                26-07-2021, 08:42 AM
                              Working...
                              X