Question regarding how to interpret a clause in the contract

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Question regarding how to interpret a clause in the contract

    Hi guys,

    Theres a clause in my contract that I'm unsure how to interpret. It is as follows:

    "Not to fix or hang any posters, pictures, photographs or ornaments to the walls or ceilings or woodwork with nails, glue, sticky tape, blu-tac or similar adhesive fixings other than solely with a reasonable number of commercially made picture hooks appropriate for the purpose and to make good at the end of the tenancy"

    At first it seems like I'm not allowed to hang pictures at all, but the second half implies that I can if I use picture hooks. I can't imagine a picture hook that didn't use one of the previously listed items (the ones I had in mind were the 3M Command Strip hooks).

    Obviously if my hooks leave any damage or marks I will need to repair them, I assumed that from the outset. I'm just concerned that if the agent decides to do an inspection I'll get dinged simply for having put ANYTHING on the walls.

    Thanks in advance for any and all responses.

  • nukecad
    replied
    I posted before but it seems to have gone to moderation for some reason.

    The clause is poorly worded, as is usual when someone tries to use semi-legal / officious language to say something simple.

    ...other than solely with a reasonable number of commercially made picture hooks appropriate for the purpose...
    Any commercially made picture hook is going to be 'appropriate for the purpose', they have been made for just that purpose. So its saying that you can use any hook that you buy.

    All it prohibits is the use of just nails/screws/or adhesive without a hook, (and incidentally it says that you can't make your own hooks you have to buy them), and that you have to remove the hooks and 'make good' when you move out.

    I doubt if that was what it was it intended to say, but that's what it says.


    It would have been simpler to say either-
    "You are not allowed to hang pictures, shelves, ornaments, or other decoration, anywhere in the property, by any means"
    or specify what can be used-
    "You are allowed to hang pictures, etc., for this purpose you may only use 'Acme Superhooks' or an equivalent product from another manufacturer".
    (Even that's a bit imprecise as to what constitutes 'equivalent').

    As the clause wording currently stands it's pretty useless apart from saying that you have to 'make good' before you leave.

    Leave a comment:


  • MdeB
    replied
    Originally posted by mariner View Post
    MdeB please explain your interpretation?.
    I don't see what there is to explain.
    The structure of the clause (excluding the specifics) is "Not to do stuff OTHER THAN SOLELY (i.e.'except') like this".

    Leave a comment:


  • mariner
    replied
    MdeB please explain your interpretation?
    Making good at end of T is fine, but they rarely do it satisfactorily, leaving me free to employ a Contractor to make full restitution at commercial rate to claim from .T.

    Leave a comment:


  • MdeB
    replied
    Originally posted by Drogoth View Post
    Hi guys,

    "Not to fix or hang any posters, pictures, photographs or ornaments to the walls or ceilings or woodwork with nails, glue, sticky tape, blu-tac or similar adhesive fixings other than solely with a reasonable number of commercially made picture hooks appropriate for the purpose and to make good at the end of the tenancy"
    This says "Don't fix pictures ... UNLESS (other than solely) you do it in the stated manner".

    If you do it in the stated manner, then you are OK.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hillsy101
    replied
    Yep, get clarification in writing before doing anything.
    I've just repaired and redecorated and all walls are like new which I expect will last until about the end of the first week of a new tenant !

    Leave a comment:


  • Lawcruncher
    replied
    Best to ask agent or landlord what they mean. They may mean nail and adhesive free hooks which you can push into the plaster with your thumb. I have them in my flat. If you remove them the tiny holes left are barely visible.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewDod
    replied
    I get pretty irritated when tenants put up any new hooks and nails in walls. It is all very well to maintain that you "will repair them" but in practice this is not possible, usually, without repainting the entire wall, and with 6 month tenancies the walls rapidly turn into a huge mess.
    I have 4 or 5 proper hooks in every room, and the tenants cannot put up ANY more.

    That said your tenancy agreement seems to permit you to put a couple of picture hooks here and there.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Tenant referencing
    Sam87
    Afternoon,

    I'm just wondering if letting agents can with hold tenant references if I try and obtain a reference about a potential tenant myself aswell as getting a reference company to so the Same? I currently pay someone to do the referencing however for the 'previous landlord/agent' reference...
    16-07-2019, 12:34 PM
  • Reply to Tenant referencing
    jpkeates
    No professional agent should ever give someone a character reference or tell someone that a tenant has made unreasonable demands.
    16-07-2019, 14:25 PM
  • Part of deposit not protected
    coppernob
    Hi all,

    Last December we entered into an AST (initial 6 month fixed term) and paid a deposit of £900, which included a £200 pet deposit for our dog. This full £900 was put into the a deposit protection scheme.

    Towards the end of January we wished to get another dog, and...
    16-07-2019, 10:26 AM
  • Reply to Part of deposit not protected
    coppernob
    Is such a claim simple enough to submit ourselves, or would we need to engage a solicitor?

    Whilst I'd much rather it didn't come to it and our deposit was just returned to us, I suppose I'd need to be prepared to actually go through with it for the threat to be effective....
    16-07-2019, 14:13 PM
  • Council tax debacle.
    buttons
    I had a tenant do a runner on the 10th May, I only learned of this on 11th June when no housing benefit was paid to me as it was direct payment.
    I received the keys from the tenants daughter on the 15th June, she signed a letter stating tenancy was surrendered and keys returned.
    I wrote...
    16-07-2019, 12:05 PM
  • Reply to Council tax debacle.
    buttons
    For future, if I enter the line into the contract that at the end of the 6 month period the tenancy becomes a contractural periodic tenancy, would this leave the tenant with the bill rather than myself ?
    16-07-2019, 14:09 PM
  • Reply to Council tax debacle.
    KTC
    Assuming the tenant didn't pay the whole 6 months fixed term tenancy rent in advance making the SPT a 6-monthly periodic (again, there's a reason I asked), then the council is correct in its billing.

    Whether you can separately sue your former tenant for the cost of the council tax depend...
    16-07-2019, 13:56 PM
  • Tenant withdrawing notice
    bagus
    I accepted tenants' notice to quit their SPT mid period. Their leaving date is really badly timed for me (2 weeks into summer hols, preventing me taking the kids abroad).

    The notice wasn't valid, since it didn't end on the first or last day of the monthly SPT, but I did accept it. Now,...
    16-07-2019, 08:25 AM
  • Reply to Tenant withdrawing notice
    jpkeates
    They're not walking all over you.
    They're trying not to be homeless for three days or pay for two lots of rent.

    They've paid their rent and been decent customers of yours.
    So why not do them a small favour?
    16-07-2019, 13:45 PM
  • Reply to Part of deposit not protected
    jpkeates
    It would apply to the £250 as far as I can figure it out.

    I would suggest that the landlord might be incentivised to make the call if you suggest that that might make you feel more inclined not to bother to pursue the penalty issue.
    16-07-2019, 13:43 PM
Working...
X