Police say not enough evidence to prosecute after tenants caused over £2500 of damage

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Police say not enough evidence to prosecute after tenants caused over £2500 of damage

    My now ex tenants (man & woman couple) phoned me to say they were moving out.

    They caused over £2500 of damage and stole items which took almost 6 weeks to rectify.

    The police came to see the flat and the damage which happened at the end of February 2017 and this is still ongoing.

    I provided the police with photos and the original inventory. This was passed around from the initial officer to 4 different sergeants and I was finally told there was not enough evidence to prosecute mainly because they sat that they can’t prove which one of the 2 tenants caused the damage.

    Now I believe the police have their methods of finding out which one did the damage but not in this case.

    I have told the police that if neither of them own up to the crime then one of them is harbouring a criminal and that basically the damage was caused by one of them if not both which is more likely and if neither of them admits to causing the damage & theft of the items in question then that is perverting the course of Justice?

    I made an official complaint and an inspector phoned me to discuss this and told me that my complaint is suitable for local resolution.

    Now I Googled about this and read that I should not accept local resolution and insist that a formal investigation is carried out.

    Any advice on what to do would be appreciated.

    Thank you in anticipation.

    #2
    Forget it and move on.

    The police are lazy and useless.

    Comment


      #3
      I think you would have to prove that the one who didn't do it could have stopped it for a successful joint enterprise prosecution.

      Comment


        #4
        The police are not lazy, they are underresourced and understaffed.

        I don't know how joint enterprise even come into it.

        You can't be guilty of harbouring someone that's not wanted. It's for the Crown to prove someone has committed an offence. It is not perverting the course of justice to not admit an offence, (that whole innocent until proven guilty thing ) and that is assuming they are even guilty of it in the first place.

        The police is right. They need sufficient evidence on who actually committed an offence. They can't just charge more than one person and say "one of them did it".

        You are of course free to follow through the complaints procedure and see where that take you. Have you sued the ex-tenant for the damages? Why not focus on that?
        I am not a lawyer, nor am I licensed to provide any regulated advice. None of my posts should be treated as legal or financial advice.

        Comment


          #5
          I'm confused -- why is this about the police prosecuting the tenants -- and not about you taking the tenant (both of them) to the "small claims" court for damages under their tenancy agreement. What is stopping you from doing this? If you have evidence why do you think you will not win (you might not because the courts can be equally useless, but surely this is your first step).

          Comment


            #6
            Agree:. Police won't prosecute, nothing to stop you suing. See what evidence you can drag out of Police: overworked poor sods.

            ​​​​​
            LBA today then small claims. See CaB website for how.
            I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

            Comment


              #7
              Simply not enough evidence. CPS would never charge. Civil court as above
              Unshackled by the chains of idle vanity, A modest manatee, that's me

              Comment


                #8
                There are cases where they can charge everyone, but this is not one of them, not least because there is no way of proving it was one of them, or that they saw it being done.

                The Steven Lawrence case is an example. They couldn't prove who stabbed him, but they could show that there was none of them were innocent bystanders.

                What you are generally up against is the "beyond reasonable doubt" test. That means if it could be either, each will make their defence that the other one did it, and there could be as much as a 50% chance that was true, which is far below beyond reasonable doubt.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Phil_northeast View Post

                  I have told the police that if neither of them own up to the crime then one of them is harbouring a criminal and that basically the damage was caused by one of them if not both which is more likely and if neither of them admits to causing the damage & theft of the items in question then that is perverting the course of Justice?
                  I love how you’re telling the Police the law 😂

                  Its a civil case. Sue them and move on.

                  Comment

                  Latest Activity

                  Collapse

                  • Dispute with landlord over deposit
                    MarieMB
                    I have recently moved out of a property and requested my deposit back (£2000) from my landlord which has been protected in My Deposits scheme. I paid rent every month on time and gave him the correct amount of notice prior to moving out. I left the flat clean and received an email response from him...
                    13-05-2018, 20:47 PM
                  • Reply to Dispute with landlord over deposit
                    MarieMB
                    Hi all,

                    Thank you for all of your responses. They are very helpful.

                    Mariner, to answer your questions, it was a joint tenancy, I am listed as the lead tenant and it is my name on the deposit scheme. He took out the insurance option, which means he has spent the money. What...
                    27-05-2018, 13:10 PM
                  • Gdpr
                    serendipity129
                    Reading so much conflicting information.....I have 1 property, 1 tenant and I hols and electronic contract and have their email address, should I register and send a privacy notice?
                    24-05-2018, 09:43 AM
                  • Reply to Gdpr
                    JK0
                    Thing is, if that were the case, now the law is in place, it is too late to email anyone to ask for consent for future emails. ...
                    27-05-2018, 10:58 AM
                  • Reply to Gdpr
                    Stef Cooke
                    Rarely! And the number of large corporations who got it all wrong, some of whom are now trying to say they are sorry, can they take it all back?

                    I am holding off with the "I told you so's" for the more stridently convinced colleagues who were so rudely certain they had to ask...
                    27-05-2018, 10:14 AM
                  • moving furniture in before official occupation date.
                    ShinyTim
                    Thats it really, would you let tenants move their furniture in, before the official date on the t/a
                    they have paid the deposit and the 1st months rent, signed the agreement, and have been offered a free van to use on a date a week before I am to give them the keys

                    have been a landlord...
                    23-05-2018, 09:33 AM
                  • Reply to moving furniture in before official occupation date.
                    wfd_property
                    I would allow the day before, but with them wanting a week prior, adjust the date as others have already said.
                    27-05-2018, 09:21 AM
                  • Tenancy break up
                    Captain Birdseye
                    Hi hope someone can help with this situation.

                    Tenants have been with me for over a year and signed joint tenancy. Now on a periodic tenancy the lead tenant has given me 1 months notice to vacate the property due to relationship break down. The other person wishes to stay in the property...
                    26-05-2018, 10:49 AM
                  • Reply to Tenancy break up
                    Captain Birdseye
                    ideally no i do not want tenants on benefits but the tenant does actually work but may also look to claim to help out. To be fair they have not been bad tenants but have just had relationship break down. in a way i agree about a clean sweep but if i force them out they may dig their heels in and sit...
                    27-05-2018, 08:06 AM
                  • Reply to Tenancy break up
                    Interlaken
                    Negotiate. Do you want tenants on HB? Is the partner left at the property able to pay the rent? If it were me I would go for a clean sweep and start again with 2 working tenants - the best conbination on getting rent paid.
                    27-05-2018, 07:51 AM
                  Working...
                  X